Slashdot Mirror


Butterfly Unlocks Evolution Secret

Anonymous Coward writes "The BBC has an article about a dramatic discovery in the quest for understanding evolution. From the article: 'Why one species branches into two is a question that has haunted evolutionary biologists since Darwin. Given our planet's rich biodiversity, "speciation" clearly happens regularly, but scientists cannot quite pinpoint the driving forces behind it. Now, researchers studying a family of butterflies think they have witnessed a subtle process, which could be forcing a wedge between newly formed species.'"

9 of 1,130 comments (clear)

  1. Evolution of submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And in a week or two, this submission will evolve only slightly and will reappear, slightly reworded, as another species of submission! Ain't evolution great.

    1. Re:Evolution of submissions by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but God might decide that is deserves a repost so that some more people can learn about evolution and go to hell.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  2. Butterflies... by ejito · · Score: 5, Funny

    are racist...

  3. so... by passion · · Score: 5, Funny

    they've decided to fork?

    --
    - passion
  4. Geek speciation by truckaxle · · Score: 5, Funny

    FTA

    The other mechanism that can theoretically divide a species is "reproductive isolation". This occurs when organisms are not separated physically, but "choose" not to breed with each other thereby causing genetic isolation, which amounts to the same thing.

    Does this mean that geeks are soon to speciate and then ultimate fail as the male/female ratio is horrendously out of wack?

  5. Re:Wasn't this obvious? by Loonacy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Keep going... I don't think I've ever heard this one before.

  6. Non-Mutation Split in humans? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is easy to imagine that these two groups are slowly diverging, as they engage in different diets, breed within their own groups and engage in different physical activities.

    That might actually apply to humans as well. I mean take Conservatives and Liberals. They engage in different physiclal activities and (mostly) breed within their own groups. So will the two eventually evolve into seperate species, Homo Conservativis and Homo Liberalis? Probably, however, due to the high population denisty among humans they will also be unable to escape having to interact with each other. So the two resultant species and their behavioral patterns will influence each others evolution won't they? I mean you would for example expect the Homo Conservativis to evolve sophisticated selective hearing in order to avoid hearing anything that Homo Liberals might say that contradicts with their religious ideas while the Homo Liberals will grow thick Neanderthal like skulls due to Homo Conservatives incessantly thumping theim on the head with a Bible.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  7. The Babel fish, by the late, great, Douglas Adams. by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now it is such a bizarrely improbably coincidence that anything so mindbogglingly useful [as the Babel fish] could have evolved by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as a final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.

    The argument goes something like this: "I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing." "But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED."

    "Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  8. Re:Intelligent Design, explained Intelligently by Ploum · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm the designer.

    That's a know bug
    Send me a patch and I will merge it.