Organism Uses Solar Energy to Produce Hydrogen
Stan Freeman writes "CNET is
reporting that Stanford University researchers have discovered a soil
microorganism that splits water into hydrogen and oxygen. They are trying
to adapt this naturally occurring anaerobic organism into one that can survive
in a more normal environment. There is some
more information on biological
water splitting here
on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) web site."
This process produces "7.05 kg CO2 ... per [1.0] kilogram hydrogen".
Now new cars are getting near 140.9 [grams] C02 [per kilometer] (This is a target, double it if you want)
So, how many KGs of Hydrogen does a Hydrogen powered car need per mile? Multiply x7.05kg to get emissions based on current production technologies.
Are these hydrogen cars poisoning the planet? With a 500 km (310 miles) range, a gas powered car at the target level could sequester and store about 70 kgs (154 pounds) of CO2.
If gas stations were required to accept and sequester this CO2, we could effectively eliminate CO2 emissions from most new automobiles without criss crossing the world with Hydrogen delivery lines or developing a totally new CO2 free hydrogen creation system.
Just capture 50% of CO2 emissions and you'll be doing quite fine as far as cutting emissions goes.
The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
But, U.Wisconsin chem researchers have a chemical [heat and catalysts, not bio-reactors] process that make biodiesel out of cellulose, which is 3/4 of dried plant material by weight . This means most of what farms [and cities too, if you count leaves and grass clippings] burn, bury or compost could be feedstock. Study the diagram...the UW process needs an H2 in-feed [it hydrogenates carbon chains to make the diesel, the H2 shown leaving the reactor is a fraction of what goes in]. So their process would be an energy winner if only a source of H2 that does not consume fossil fuel were available .
NREL, Stanford, meet U. Wisconsin. U. Wisconsin, meet Stanford and NREL. if you guys play nice together and don't play politics, maybe my grandchildren won't be bicycling to the library to read about an age when combustible hydrocarbon liquids were used to run selfpropelled vehicles.
I'd love to know exactly how credible the UW claims are. To whet the appetite of chemically knowledgible
I was so tempted to try posting the UW result when it came out but
SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
It does not need to cost less than current forms of H energy either. All it needs to do is find a nitrate souce from a waste process that makes more money than the current use. Believe you me, there are so many different types of waste sources and uses that this is interesting just for that.
An Education is the Font of All Liberty