Slashdot Mirror


Parents Need To Be Informed

GamerDad writes "Dave Long looks at the recent gaming controversy and lays the blame squarely on the parents. 'If you didn't talk to them about this game before buying it for your child, then you chose to be uninformed and there's nothing myself, the game maker, the retailer or the government can do to help you. The information is out there. In fact, it's right here on GamerDad. Be smarter next time and take a couple minutes to check it out.'"

10 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Right on! by negative3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Abso-fucking-lutely! I love GTA:SA but would have to be brain damaged to let little kids play it. Whatever happened to parental responsibility?

    --
    "Physics is to math what sex is to masturbation." - Richard Feynman
    1. Re:Right on! by Pxtl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heheh, I actually saw GTA:Vice City sold to a parent once. The clerk quietly explained to her that the game contained violence, picking up prostitutes, shooting cops, etc. She walked over to her 11ish-year-old boy, discussed the matter with him briefly, and bought the game.

      Nice, eh?

      Also, the ESRB needs to establish a firm guideline on disabled content (which is different from "hidden" content that can be enabled through cheats, etc.) Many games have forgotten or ignored content. For example, there were several clean titles based on the classic Doom and Wolf3d engines (Chex Quest, Noah's Ark) etc. These games were very childish, but the horrible Doom monsters - complete with gory deaths - were still packed into the wadfiles. They just never made an appearance in-game. Likewise, games may have localization data or similar left in that may be controversial in different areas.

      The ESRB needs to make a firm policy on the game _data_ as distinct from the game _content_ (content is stuff in the game - data is stuff in the files). Hot Coffee was not physically in the game anywhere - it was physically on the media, but there was no way to access it in-game. The ESRB needs clear guidelines on this.

      The future considerations of the medium may make this more complicated. After all, in the future, technological solutions to problems may involve throwing clothes over nude models (a-la Maya cloth). This may go so far as to include nipples for the purpose of providing headlights. Therefore, a trivial hack would be to remove the clothes.

    2. Re:Right on! by sykjoke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to go hunting when I was a child and haven't killed anyone I know about. Compair that the the unreality of GTA's which is only slightly more interesting movie. What did you do when you were young? stay indoors all day and get mollycoddled by you parents. Gees, most people I went to school with saw no end of horror movies and porn, and I don't believe any of them have ever been arrested for violent behavior or sexual assault.

  2. Pornography? Give me a break. by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The content was **not accessable** through normal gameplay - it was only accessable via modding.

    Classifying this as pornography is like saying that Pocahontas should be classified as pornography, because some clever video editing can remove that leather dress. The modded game is not the same as the game as sold, it is a different game.

    The whole charade is ridiculous.

    1. Re:Pornography? Give me a break. by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The modded game is not the same as the game as sold, it is a different game.

      I think that's a valid point, but it has nothing to with Dave Long's complaining that parents should have somehow deduced the presence of the unlockable content from the box labels.

  3. More like "ObviousDad". by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So parents should assume responsibility for the entertainment their kids consume? Duh.

    Really, worrying about videogames should be the bottom of your list. Your kids will encounter far worse influences and situations and threats just going to school every day. Kids aren't stupid. I remember being a kid and tits never warped me or turned me into a sadistic sex fiend (something else is to blame for that). Violent games and television didn't turn me into Manson or a highway sniper. Have some common sense and realize that your kids understand media far better than you ever will and your fears are baseless and stupid.

    Seriously, what videogame out there has or could turn any normal kid into a sadistic killer or something, unless he's a fucking deranged ass from a totally dysfunctional and useless family in the first place? Getting a divorce or smacking your spouse around does a million times the damage to a kid that every ounce of television and videogame violence and sex combined could ever do.

    1. Re:More like "ObviousDad". by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know of a few that hve trouble distinguishing reality to a point.

      ex 1: wrestling real vs fake. I had arguments into highschool about that one (in fact I be tthe person still thinks it is real)

      ex 2: own strength vs professionals. I have an uncle that in a fund raiser paid $20.00 to fight a boxer for a minute (one of the big namesforget who). He said he was getting beet up but thought he was holding his own and very proud. 5 seconds fromt eh end of the time he hears "bite hard" and the next thing he remembers is gainin conciousness. The uy could of KO's in a matter of seconds if he wanted. As a follow up my little brother thinks that his little legue team could field well enough to play agains pros (as long as they had a pitching machine). This was expressed to me in complete sentances.

      ex 3: when young and watching Macuyver I thought a lot of stuff that was going on was possible, possibly into my early teens even. That is a clear bluring of the lines of fantasy and reality.

      less specifically: younger people do play these games and do get distorted perceptions of reality. There is definatly a bluring between game vs simulation and people do play these games thinking they could easily do such and such.

      The problem isn't that people are goingt o play games/watch movies and think it is real, the problem is that people will see the same movie cliche over and over and think it is practical.

      I am sure we all know/knew people growing up that watched some movie with a foul mouthed cool protagonist and they thoguht that was cool and appropriate too.

      I would like to add that Hot Coffe is fairly innocuous and that they can take my adult oriented TV/movies out of my cold dead fingers (if the FCC takes control of cable and the Shield ends up like NYPD Blue I will become an activist). But I would not watch the Shield with my younger brother (who would probably find it boring) and I wouldn't buy him GTA to play every day after school. He is capable of seeing them both as fantasy, but they can still influence (if your fantasies don't influance your life at all you are probably a sad individual.

      I don't think playing a game once would be a problem for anybody, but becomin immersed in a rich alternate reality certainly can (even for adults).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  4. Right. All the parent's fault. by Wraithfighter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Look, I agree that the parents need to do a better job of protecting their children from extreme imagery, but, lets face it, there's plenty of blame to go around.

    Maybe the game developers can make thier games a little less, oh I don't know, in-your-face about the violence and stuff? I mean, GTA was okay with that, but Manhunt? Manhunt, rockstar? Do we really need a game who's basis is to sneak up behind people and kill them in hideously ghastly ways?

    The government could get involved in helping to make sure that the little-uns can't get their hands on Mature rated games, through the classic system of fines.

    The stores could get involved, when a 60 year old woman comes in to buy GTA:SA, by asking if its for thier underage kid and asking if they think its really appropriate?

    Oh, and the most important culprit: The kids themselves! Are we totally forgetting that the way that a lot of these kids are getting these games is by convincing their parents that "oh, don't worry mommy, GTA really isn't THAT violent a game!"

    Show of hands: How many people here have convinced mommy and daddy to pick up an M rated game for them when they were under 17?

    *raises hand*

    The parents have to do a lot of things. Maybe the other people involved could, *gasp*, make their jobs a bit easier! Some fault does lie with them, but not all of it...

    --
    Beyond the Polygons : Because 50,000 polygo
    1. Re:Right. All the parent's fault. by xero314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've never gotten upset at a post before but this time I risk the bad karam because the parent poster is a fucking retard.

      It's not the job of the government or any corporation to raise your children. Corporations jobs are to make money, and if people will buy violent sexual games then let them. Kids can't just go into any store and buy an M rated video game, regardless of the fact that a store might be willing to sell it to them. See you miss the point that the child has to get the money for the purchase and be taken to the store, or allowed to go there on there own. The point is, some where in this process there SHOULD be parental involvement. If the goverment has to get involved it should be through Child Protective Services by taking the child away from these unfit parents that facilitate the purchasing of unfit material for thier children. (Then euthanize or at least setilize the parents)

      All you idiots that think you can have a child and let it raise it self should fucking be shot by children with guns. Why? Because you are the fucking idiots that allow children to get ahold of firearms. And stop blaming your stupid mistakes in raising children on your parents mistakes. Take some responsibility people.

    2. Re:Right. All the parent's fault. by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The parents have to do a lot of things. Maybe the other people involved could, *gasp*, make their jobs a bit easier! Some fault does lie with them, but not all of it...

      So to make their lives easier, you're suggesting that some products that you have decided are inappropriate (like Manhunt) be removed from shelves, despite the fact that some adults want the game and are mature enough to handle it? To make parent's lives easier you want to increase government meddling in free speech issues? To make parents lives easier, you want the pimple-faced counter monkey at the local game store to act as a nanny for their adult customers?

      Yes, parenting is a hard job. You should damn well know that before you try to raise children. Expecting everyone else to change to make your job easier seems awfully selfish. If you can't handle the responsibility do the rest of the world a favor and don't have kids.