Slashdot Mirror


Mac mini Built Into Wall

Lilmuckers writes "I have just completed a project to build a Mac mini into the wall of my kitchen. It is hidden and everything works perfectly."

4 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. Seems to be surviving the /,-ing by Munra · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.caffeine-junkies.com/?mode=articles&pag e=print&id=7 seems OK, and is all on one page.

    Manta

  2. Arrrrrrrg by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here [Next] is [Next] my [Next] Mac [Next] Mini [Next] in [Next] a [Next] wall.

    For everyone who just wants to skip to the chase and see "a Mac Mini in someone's kitchen wall", which is what I wanted to see (not pictures of an effing butter knife)...completed Mini in the wall.

    Also, I think the entire W3C group has a simultaneous conniption with the author's use of "Clicky" to note an image that is also a link. That's the purpose, astoundingly, of a BLUE BORDER around an image...along with the cursor change, the tool tip, AND the display of a URL in the bottom of the browser window. I think it's probably worse than the usual "to see a picture of me and a llama, click here. To find out more about llamas, click here."

    I know I had a conniption, thanks to the atrocious grammar....

  3. IBM maintains a nice "legends" page by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Informative

    about their iSeries and such

    http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/legen ds/index_flat.html

    It also includes the "server" lost behind the wall. The reenactments are cute and somewhat based on "true" stories.

    Another set of stories is at...
    http://www.iseriesnetwork.com/nodeuk/ukarchive/ind ex.cfm?fuseaction=viewarticle&CO_ContentID=13885

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  4. Awful website. by blanks · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not only do they claim that the site is not compatible with IE (which renders it fine) But they claim that the website is w3 compliant.

    After the page loads I get a nice JavaScript error, and also decided to check the w3 validator and found 24 errors, not making the website compliant.

    If your going to complain about " standard compliant browsers" you should at least make your site compliant to THE standards you claim to enforce.