Slashdot Mirror
DEFCON Coverage Round-up at Make
ptorrone writes "If you couldn't get to Vegas this year for the annual DEFCON Conference, we have a special spot on MAKE Magazine with all the project centric activities from DEFCON, enhanced audio, images, posts and more. It was a logistically challenging event to cover, but we hope you enjoy what we were able to capture."
To my recollection no "cock" in the sense of a phallus has been inserted into that hole or any other orifice of mine.
Hence I think your descriptive creative use of words to indicate said hole seems to have flawed. Or our concepts differ when we refer to the normal utilisation of said hole.
Lusers and wannabe hackers. Who has time for 'em?
Is this where your penis size gets mentioned? :P :P
Anyways, to everyone else out there, this was during one of the Defcon presentations, by Vanna Vinyl. You just had to be there.
Rediculous is ridiculous!
Dude, we totally SlashDOS'd DEFCON!
/. You got pwnd!
We are soooooo 1337! ph34r
So tell me, does CmdrTaco fist your ass before or after you suck off CowboyNeal?
Just wondering. I have a wireless router using WPA-PSK security with TKIP cipher type and a 24 character WPA passphrase and I was wondering if that can be hacked?
--- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
I recently started reading at -1 "uncut and raw" and it's pretty damn raw. Are posting privileges reduced/revoked based on IP, due to the overwhelming amount of AC trolls?
Back to reading at +1...
your security is then fully dependent on the strenght of your passphrase. bruteforceing and/or dictionary attacks are still possible. the capture of a single packet is enough to start cracking at home
it seems that passive RFID eavesdropping is possible from tens of feet distance, rather scary if your RFID passport sends valuable ID information to a thief !
S0M3B0DY M0d 73h pAR3Nt P057 ++++++++5, IN5iT3PhU77!!!!111!1111!!111
Nothing about this year's Vinyl Vanna? For shame!
There is a nice mirror of the presentations at: http://164.106.251.250/docs/netsec/defcon13/ For those that want to see the slides.
Irongeek's Hacking Videos / Security Videos and Articles
It was a logistically challenging event to cover
Um, like operating a camcorder?
I was at Defcon this year, my first ever, and I can say without reading the article it was a superb event. The number of people there was simply amazing, and most speakers filled or nearly filled out each venue. A few speakers were what I would consider "underdogs", because they didn't get the attention of any large crowd, but were fantastic. The talk on sketchtools and on Meme Mining for Fun/Profit were both excellent. There was a random presentation by the (a?) assistant director of the DoD, which talked a lot about the information grid the DoD is building, and how the DoD wanted to recruit skilled persons. Theres really too much to talk about in a small blurb here, but hopefully the article comes up soon.
Lynn Cisco presentation
http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/lynn-cisco.pdf
If you bother to read his post, you'll see he claims never to have orally received cock, so OBVIOUSLY the fisting comes before, and not after, the sucking off of CowboyNeal. Crack monkey.
the Wall of Sheep and I immediately thought, 1-2-3-4-5? That's amazing! I have the same combination on my LUGGAGE!!
did it end successfully?
As usual Bobcat was funny with his drunken ranting on this years Hacker Jeapordy. Only 3 people vomited this year. I also got to see boobies
How would you capture a packet? More importantly, how would you make capturing a packet as difficult as possible?
--- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
Well, one way would be to use wireless only between two fixed points with directional antennaes. An even better way would be to send the wireless signal through a shielded cable. In other words, you can't really do it and still actually have a portable, wireless connection.
Pretty much any technique to actually make it difficult to capture a packet without limiting range and portability is going to run afoul of regulatory agences. For example, winnowing and chaffing might be doable on a wired network, but the FCC would not be happy about everyone using security methods that flood the spectrum with 90% fake packets.
LOL about the shielded cable wireless trick. I'll tell that to a coworker, they won't get it for days!
:)
How about limiting the range? I could measure my house from end to end and restrict the range to that. Then someone might have to come up to my doorstep to tap me.
--- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!