Slashdot Mirror


Google Blacklists CNet Reporters

An anonymous reader writes "Cnet News.com is reporting that Google is no longer talking to Cnet reporters. In an article about the search company looking for new executive chefs, the article states: 'Google representatives have instituted a policy of not talking with CNET News.com reporters until July 2006 in response to privacy issues raised by a previous story.' Apparently, Google was angered by an article published earlier by Cnet where all sorts of personal information about Google CEO Eric Schmidt was included. The information was obtained from Google searches."

16 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. What's Good for the Goose? by geoffrobinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the author's point was to show how Google can be used to invade privacy, I'm not sure why Google would throw a hissy fit.

    Are they saying you shouldn't use Google to invade privacy? If so, don't allow it in the first place.

    Or is he just afraid people will learn he likes Elton John.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:What's Good for the Goose? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hasn't everyone googled their own name?

      I never did that. So, I took your advice. Seems that I actually appeared in an old Francis Ford Coppolla movie. I guess I never knew....

  2. This is a good thing. by mrRay720 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anything involving the reduction of scope for C/Z/net to grow is good. Rarely in my life have I ever come across such a poor source of information.

    Seriously, what the hell are they actually good for? Biased reviews, news available elsewhere, and alleged 'gurus' writing columns that are either blindingly obvious or hilariously incorrect.

    If I were Mr. Google, I'd refuse to talk to them purely because they're rubbish, never mind any previous articles and privacy concerns.

    1. Re:This is a good thing. by generic-man · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seriously, what the hell are [C|Net/ZDNet] actually good for? Biased reviews, news available elsewhere, and alleged 'gurus' writing columns that are either blindingly obvious or hilariously incorrect.

      That's big talk coming from a man posting to Slashdot of all sites.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:This is a good thing. by eander315 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's big talk coming from someone who has 1800+ posts and an active journal.

    3. Re:This is a good thing. by snopes · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would disagree.

      http://slashdot.org/~snopes

      Get a job ;-)

  3. Executive Chefs? by neo5064 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why not just promote from within the company? Is the food really that bad?

  4. Pick and choose by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah Drew Barrymore won't speak to me either despite all the flowers, postcards, and pictures I send.

    Seriously. When did anyone have an obligation to do an interview?

    __
    168+ New Funny Clips Added
  5. Re:Live by the Search, die by the Search by GeckoX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man, you are the king of restating the article summary aren't you?

    For once could you at least attempt to impart an original thought rather than regurgitation the article? Sheesh, this one is just regurgitating the article _summary_.

    --
    No Comment.
  6. Are they hungry? by sehryan · · Score: 3, Funny

    "In ar article about the search company looking for new executive chefs..."

    So I guess Google is branching out into the food business?

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
  7. Oh the Irony by cloudness+is+x · · Score: 5, Funny

    Article's pulled off, so here's the Google cache.

  8. he search company looking for new executive CHIEF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This place is retarded.

  9. Re:Live by the Search, die by the Search by IpalindromeI · · Score: 2, Funny

    is there and avl

    Would it really have been that difficult to type six more letters? You went to all the trouble of typing up an entire comment saying nothing, and then you want to save on six keystrokes. You could have used a comma and periods instead of the useless ellipses and come out almost even.

    --

    --
    Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  10. Re:Live by the Search, die by the Search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    He cant shutup for a second. Just look at his comment history. Cocksuckers proud of his lil star.

  11. Re:Live by the Search, die by the Search by vmcto · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know, you only get some many letters in one lifetime.

    Once they're gone your done.

    Jus because I'm a nice guy, I'm sending you some extra ones I ad lying about. Use them wisely.

    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz
    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz
    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz
    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz
    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz
    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz
    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz
    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz
    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz
    abc def ghi jkl mno pqr stu vwx yz

  12. Re:I'm not feeling sorry by Gruneun · · Score: 3, Funny

    And what if I didn't put it on the Internet? What if it was just email?

    Um, you do realize that email goes... through... the... Internet, right?