Slashdot Mirror


FCC To Require Backdoor Network Access for Feds

humankind writes "The EFF is reporting that the Federal Communications Commission issued a release [pdf] announcing its new rule expanding the reach of the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act (CALEA)." From the article: "Practically, what this means is that the government will be asking broadband providers - as well as companies that manufacture devices used for broadband communications - to build insecure backdoors into their networks, imperiling the privacy and security of citizens on the Internet. It also hobbles technical innovation by forcing companies involved in broadband to redesign their products to meet government requirements."

1 of 492 comments (clear)

  1. Re:right to privacy by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Just finished the bar. Don't remember it from Constitutional law but for the bar, we studied the fundimental rights pretty thoroughly. The right to privacy is a fundamental, if implied, right which in turn leads to other rights - the right to marry, to procreate, to use contraceptives, to have an abortion, etc.

    So for now, it is alive and well in theory.

    But scotus has taken rights that once were fundamental and reclassified them as not (forget which ones right now). So it comes down to what the scotus du jure thinks.

    There was a guy in my law classes who, after 911, kept saying that we may have passed into an era where privacy must be sacrificed. I don't think it is necessary and hope he was wrong.

    Related comment - last year I reported some vandalism on my property. I refused to fill out the fields for age, race, hair and eye color, etc. The police called me and refused to enter the report (I did it online) unless I provided that information. I said "why? You know where I live and I was the victim (sort of - my property was)" Their reply? "The FBI won't like it." Scary.