Slashdot Mirror


Do We Really Need Space Weapons?

tcd004 writes "The U.S. military is developing technology to disable, jam, and even destroy enemy satellites. But are space weapons necessary? No, says Michael Krepon, director of the Stimson Center's Space Security Project. He argues that developing space weapons is a surefire way to launch a new space weapon race.

19 of 938 comments (clear)

  1. We need these weapons.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    otherwise, what will we do when the Gamalons attack?

  2. Re:When space access becomes cheap and ubiquitous. by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 5, Funny
    There will be no need to worry about weapons based in space...someone will just send a ship up and steal the whole satellite.

    This is why we need the snooping powers provided by the USA-PATRIOT act. All we need do to foil the plots of satellite-stealing villains is track the purchases of large numbers of silver jumpsuits and miniskirts. An ounce of prevention...

    --
    stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
  3. Promoting space technology by syntaxglitch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Two of the biggest drives behind innovation are:
    1) The military
    2) Sex

    The sooner we get both of those going into space, the sooner we'll get some decent progress in spaceflight technology.

  4. Re:To put it in scientific terms... by murphyslawyer · · Score: 3, Funny
    The next thing you know, laserbeams from outer space could fry anyone anywhere.
    Naw, that's not really an issue, 'cause if the military DOES try anything a team of wacky kids from Cal Tech will put a stop to it.
    --
    I ain't evil, I'm just good looking.
  5. Gentlemen... by JohnPerkins · · Score: 4, Funny

    We must develope this basselope-based weapons system. Rumors are that the russians have a basselope of their own. Do you know what that means, boy? A BASSELOPE GAP!!!

  6. What about the Cylons by Tom7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And how are we supposed to ward off a cylon attack without space weapons?

    1. Re:What about the Cylons by pointbeing · · Score: 2, Funny
      And how are we supposed to ward off a cylon attack without space weapons?

      We use the sharks with lasers on their heads, silly. Space weapons are just an expensive substitute for stuff we already have.

      --
      we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
      -- anais nin
  7. This guy may just have a point.... by linuxrunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Follow my logic here:

    Without Space Weapons, there would be no Star Trek
    Without Star Trek, there would be no Captain Kirk
    Without Captain Kirk, there would be no Geeks
    Without Geeks, there would be no Slashdot
    Without Slashdot, I would stop wasting time at work

    So: No Space Weapons = No Geeks = No Slashdot = A Raise in our National GDP

    Therefore: Profit!

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
  8. Re:A dissent by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Nothing worthwhile is left unguarded."

    So the US/Canadian border is worthless?

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  9. Not a good idea at this point in time. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1, Funny

    The US has been anything but responsible over the past 5 years, so I wouldn't think of it as a good idea to do this right now.

    Maybe in the future once dickhead is out of office, but.. not any time soon.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  10. Re:When space access becomes cheap and ubiquitous. by lgw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Plus, as everyone knows, if we don't have space weapons, we can be conquered by aliens who only have a stick with a nail in the end.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  11. Re:To put it in scientific terms... by ValuJet · · Score: 2, Funny
    laserbeams from outer space could fry anyone anywhere

    It could be worse, sharks could be able to survive in the vacuum of space aswell. Then we'd be really boned.

  12. Re:When space access becomes cheap and ubiquitous. by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, if Michael Krepon, the director of something called the "Space Security Project" for something called the "Stimson Center" says we don't need space-based weapons, that pretty much settles the issue, doesn't it?

    I mean, he's an EXPERT!

    It sounds like he might even be an expert on SCIENCE and stuff!

    What more is there to discuss!?

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  13. Re:When space access becomes cheap and ubiquitous. by absinthminded64 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they'll have a web-based interface and we can slashdot the satellites/weapons by hosting some dorky 'I built a toaster oven out of legos' pages up there.

    It could prevent a nukelurr tourist attack!

    What if W gets a JS error when he clicks the LAUNCH button?

  14. Perhaps space is where Iraq keeps the WMDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Seems Dubya's still having a hard time finding those WMDs (the ones where he told the UN tht he knew where they were)

    Perhaps Iraq hid them in space - once we have such a ship that can steal the satellite we'll have proof that the war had some justification.

  15. Re:Against treaties by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Personally if my neighrbor enforces a ban on comming within 200 feet of his front door (as long as those 200 feet arn't in the road), with his sniper rifle. While the rest of us ban 3feet from our door with our basebat bats. I say more power to em, just give me a warning shot first.. ok.

  16. Re:Talk about short sighted! by jusdisgi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hehe. That's pretty funny...you got modded Troll for pointing out your own typo ;-)

    --
    Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  17. Re:Talk about short sighted! by Golias · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, it was very rude of me...

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  18. Re:North Korean or Chinese .. by micromuncher · · Score: 2, Funny

    North Korea doesn't have the economics or science to be involved in a space race.

    Sure, the Chinese have space ambitions, but they suffer from the same economic and technological hurdles... they want to put a man on the moon to stir national pride. Why the hell would they want to spend billions in Star Wars when they already have numerical superiority? In a conventional ground war, hi-tech technology is not decided advantage.

    I like your McCarthyism though - keeps Boeing going.

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher