Pro-Active VoIP Management Solutions?
Adeptus_Luminati asks: "I've been running a 1000 user Mitel VoIP phone (to the desk) network which encompasses 20 buildings glued together by our Telco's _private_ fibre backbone (no Internet involved here). Once in a while we have voice quality degradation issues caused by excess latency, jitter, bandwidth saturation, QoS mis-configurations, and so forth. I've been using Ixia Chariot software to simulate VoIP calls over the WAN between our various offices and collect data of the problems, but this is only useful AFTER the problem is reported by our users, and after I am lucky enough to be around and catch the problem happening in real time; otherwise, I have no way of proving to our Telco that there IS a problem. What solutions have other network admins come up with to pro-actively manage similar private VoIP networks?"
"I am looking for some sort of solution to allow me to pro-actively monitor or simulate 24/7 VoIP calls between offices and then report back to me immediately when certain thresholds of voice quality degradation have been exceeded and accumulate significant info that I can forward my Telco and get them to deal with the problem, right away. FYI, bandwidth is free on my office WAN links, we're mostly 100Mbit fibre, and we have QoS from end to end (except small parts of the telco backbone)."
The Voice Option is a value-added package that integrates with InfiniStream Network Management to provide additional insights into voice- and video-over-IP converged traffic. Voice-over-IP (VoIP) Experts automatically detect and help resolve key problems seen on VoIP networks--jitter, packet loss, packet-sequencing errors, and latency. These VoIP Experts and call-tracking capabilities, along with the traditional Expert system, help ensure successful VoIP network rollouts while maintaining "toll-quality" voice and high-quality data for all users.
The product URL is here
They make a couple of versions. The last time I looked, the 1 TB version was around 25K and the 4 TB version was around 95K. I didn't buy one, but it was a fun toy to play with.
Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP
Talk to the ogg-vorbis people, and check their mailing list archives. I believe they have some tools that do the moral equivalent of:
i s+quantitative&btnG=Search
... ie: "it sounds better").
$ compress foo.wav > foo.ogg
$ compare foo.wav foo.ogg
18% different
Some interesting quick googling turned up the following: http://www.abde.net/projects/ogg_mp3/
Original google search:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=ogg+vorb
Term I seem to recall is "quantitative" comparision of audio quality (vs. "qualitative"
When doing audio "optimization" there are a few types of tests, one that can be done by computers (comparing data and formulas to other data), and the other that has to be done by people.
If you only did the "computer" type tests, you might have something that is as close to accurate as possible, but would still sound "off" in the "wrong way" to human ears (ie: the computer might have "optimized out" all the bass in order to be more accurate on the treble, but few people would accept "qualitatively" the results of that compression, even though quantitatively it might be "closer to accurate" than the other).
Anyway, I am not an audio researcher, but you might start there.
--Robert
Expensive option:Empirx Hammer XMS. It does all of the above with a nice web interface plus it gives you RTP quality metrics like r-factor and MOS. It's not cheap, but I've used and it does a good job (it is basically a SuSE Linux box with some networking gear running their network monitoring software).
All of the above I have tested only with SIP/RTP traffic. If you youse MGCP or H.323, I can't personally vouch for either of the above solutions, though both support them.
There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.