Slashdot Mirror


Pros and Cons of Tech Offshoring?

An anonymous reader asks: "There's an interesting analysis of tech offshoring at the moment posted on Membox. It looks at the pros and cons of the practice in two separate articles. Since this is a big issue in tech at the moment, it's good to see the arguments on each side given so clearly. What effect do Slashdot readers think offshoring is having on the industry?"

13 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. fear, mostly by Hitch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I haven't seen a lot of jobs actually go away because of it, but a lot of people are jumping ship out of fear - and we're having to hire lots of new people to replace them.

    --
    You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
    http://propheteer.org
    1. Re:fear, mostly by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where do you work? If you haven't been downsizing and are still outsourcing, I want to send your company a resume. I'm sure several thousand others will as well. You're completely right about the fear- but if your company has succeeded in avoiding downsizing while outsourcing, that fear is mostly baseless in your case, where it isn't baseless elsewhere. For instance, I can show you closed factories right here in my home state of Oregon that were built by HP and Intel- those jobs left for China and India. I know people from Microsoft who were downsized and their jobs moved to the Windows Research Center of Hydrabad. If your company never downsizes, I know plenty of engineers who would like to work there.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  2. Wrong question by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The study of economics is based on a simple problem - human wants are infinite, but the resources to satisfy those wants are only finite. So the question becomes - How do we satisfy our wants with the most efficient use of resources?

    From the pro article. I've seen this a lot- but there is at least one economic theory, distributism, that claims that human wants are just the mortal sin of greed and human NEEDS are what we should be focused on satisfying- and human needs are indeed finite.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  3. Long term... by Evro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    By sending jobs to other countries you end up ensuring that your potential customers can't afford your product, as they have no income.

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Long term... by davecb · · Score: 3, Informative
      Henry Ford noticed this problem, and started the rise of Detroit by building a car that his own factory workers could afford to buy.

      Previously cars were expensive enough that the rich bought them. Now with Fords, anyone could buy them, and the number sold skyrocketed.

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    2. Re:Long term... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you kept the jobs in the US, then no one would be able to afford them. Right now, a shirt made by slave labor costs about $15. How much would it cost if it were made by USians getting paid $8 an hour?

      About $15- the price did not go down significantly when the manufacture went overseas. The real difference is that the retailer now makes a 200% profit instead of a 10% profit on the same shirt.

      On top of that, no one really *wants* to make shirts in the US. People want jobs, but not thoes kinds of jobs.

      Tell that to the textiles union- which has been testifying in Congress for the last 40 years to try to protect the jobs of the 500,000 Americans who used to make shirts. They failed because of people like you.

      Offshoring is a way to make sure that the US will continue to get better. We look at the shittiest jobs out there and find a way to send them overseas. Then our workforce trains for better jobs.

      At which point the better jobs leave before they can even finish training.

      Picking fruit, makinf shoes, and writing code are all in the same bucket; no one wants to do it at the price customers are willing to pay. So we offshore it.

      And what is left?

      Retrain for something better and stop bitching already.

      What's better? I want to know what the next target for offshoring is- I've got a bunch of Indians who are perfectly willing to train to do it....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  4. A conspicous downside by davecb · · Score: 4, Interesting
    A company I consulted for (and a whole country, but that's a different story) has been through the offshoring process and is now onshoring.

    My former employer succeeded in outsourcing their operations to EDS, and are still a happy EDS customer.

    They then tried a second cost-reduction step, offshoring their development to a well-respected firm on the opposite side of the planet. The timezone problem was a nuisance, but not a serious problem except when doing maintenance, so they offshored maintenance to the same company.

    This seemed to work, but on looking at the financial results a few quarters later, they realized they'd done a very brave thing: they'd inadvertently offshored their software budgeting decisions. With both maintenance and new development in the hands of a supplier, the supplier was the only person who could make credible decisions about how much to spend. And the spending was growing.

    So they turned around and started onshoring, hiring some of the folks who had been the offshoring team and moving them back to Canada, co-locating them with the user groups and the budgeting managers, and go control of their own budget back.

    They're now genuinely reluctant to allow anything to be done remotely, including having me dial in from home. They want my body withing shouting distance of my manager!

    Losing cost control can make you a little nervous if you're a big company, because it can rapidly make you a small company(;-))

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  5. Some informed opinion by Otter · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you're interested in some fact-based analysis of this issue (as opposed to the argument-from-first-principles of the Membox pieces and *shudder* whatever the Slashbots will come up with):

    Daniel Drezner has some interesting analysis on his site. His linked articles, especially the Foreign Affairs one, are also good.

    I, by the way, am pretty agnostic on this issue, and linked to only one side because it's the only good discussion I've seen. (As opposed to, say, Lou Dobbs using an hour of CNN every night to rant about evil Mexicans.) I'd welcome similar links on the anti- side.

  6. I'm hopeful! by mutterc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    (That will seem odd given my posting history.)

    My company was using TCS for a while, then opened their own office in Hyderabad to cut down on the middleman-costs.

    According to several reports from Indians here and dealings with some of the managers there, Hyderabad is getting like Silicon Valley in the late '90s. People can simply walk out whenever they want, they'll find a new job the next day. There's a lot of turnover because of that.

    Also, wages are going up. A couple of our test guys (who are dealing with hordes of Indian colleagues, of course) have noted that the wages are coming up to where it's not that much less expensive to hire in India. (It's still cheaper than the U.S. of course).

    I had always predicted / feared that once this wage parity started happening, companies would start offshoring all their jobs to other places (China? Romania? the Congo?) but that does not seem to be happening, probably because few other countries are teeming with English-speaking programmers as India is.

    This means that there's some hope for the trade equilibrium predicted by classical economics / big-business apologists, rather than the "race to the bottom" where every country becomes Third World, predicted by me and some fellow paranoids.

  7. What effect? by rlp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What effect do Slashdot readers think offshoring is having on the industry?

    About the same effect that Dutch Elm Disease had on Elm trees.

    Between H1B's and outsourcing, the industry has decimated the software engineering profession. Many of my former co-workers have bailed out after months and even years of unemployment. And these were not "Learn Web Programming in 21 Days" people - these were people with Masters degrees (or higher) in CS or EE and years of experience. In many cases they've gone back to school and have started new careers and they're not coming back. A the same time US college students and high school students do not regard software development as a good career. Enrollment is CS / EE degree programs in the US have dropped dramatically.

    I'm already seeing articles about 'problems' with outsourcing in trade journals. I'm also seeing articles from industry groups about lomming 'shortages'; which always end up blaming the US 'educational system'. Makes me want to whack these people with a large clue-by-four.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  8. MORE OFFSHORING NEEDED, PLEASE! by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Funny
    The more that companies dump their dead wood only to find that the offshore guys suck just as much (in different ways), means more work for us independent consultants to bring the projects back in house! Yay!!

    So, offshore more, please!!!eleventyone

    --
    Yeah, right.
  9. Some folks seek such specific skillsets... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...that they could walk into a room filled with several dozen experienced programmers, interview each one, and fail to find a single "qualfied" candidate.

    Remember that not everyone has formal experience using the same set of specific products or tools that you have, and that many things (like file formats) are relatively easy for almost anyone to pick up and work with if they're even remotely competent.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  10. Common in your specific industry, perhaps. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That doesn't make it a common skill in the general programmer population, however, and that's my point.

    We use a lot of specific technology in the airline industry, also, but over the years we learned that the probability of finding someone who knows those formats, languages, or systems/environments was just about zero unless they'd actually worked in the airline industry before.

    Because of this, we decided that some level of basic technical training was going to be a fact of life regardless of who we hired, and in the long run that turned out to be better. A person with good previous general software development/support experience proved to be more valuable than some of the folks we'd hired who already knew the specific technology!

    Don't be too sure that someone couldn't learn about DICOM in a week. I had a contract once where I knew the main language being used but I didn't know anything about the specific database in use, any of the text editors, or the general programming environment, and I was writing productive code at that site (and modifying an existing program) inside four hours, mainly thanks to their willingness to teach me what was needed.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.