Groups Slam FCC on Internet Phone Tap Rule
kamikaze-Tech writes "An Associated Press report posted in the Vonage VoIP Forums discusses the new CALEA regulations that will make it easier for
law enforcement to tap Internet phone calls. The article claims that the
new law will also make computer systems more vulnerable to hackers, according to
some digital privacy and civil liberties groups. While the groups don't want
the Internet to be a safe haven for terrorists and criminals, they complain that
expanding wiretapping laws to cover Internet calls -- or Voice over Internet
Protocol (VoIP) -- will create additional points of attack and security holes
that hackers can exploit. VoIP service providers such as Vonage, Skype and
Packet 8 have eighteen months to comply with the new law."
Isn't that the same CALEA law that also forces router/NIC makers to install FBI backdoors (which can also be compromised by hackers)?
I see a big market soon for do-it-yourself NICs and PC routers...
--- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
I don't mind phone tapping at all - as long is there is cause for it's need. However as stated in another posting it is kinda stupid, as if people want to communicate over the net for dodgy dealings, they are certainly not going to use one of the mainstream (or indeed, any) VOIP provider.
If only the UK was able to procecute criminals based on phone tapping, currently it's not allowed (hears gasps of shock).
Interesting... Once again, we have a parallel to gun control here. I would assume from the conversation that all parent posts to this would also agree that just as this tangential law won't stop a criminal from communicating, nor will a given gun-ban stop a criminal from obtaining and using an illegal firearm. If you outlaw encrypted VOIP, only criminals will have encrypted VOIP. And the rest of us are screwed.