Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Bold Patent Move

theodp writes "On Thursday, the USPTO disclosed that Microsoft has a patent pending for displaying numbers in a box to make them stand out. " Check out the images to see the power of this breakthrough patent. That's almost impossible to do without patents.

18 of 571 comments (clear)

  1. Next: Microsoft patents the patent by venicebeach · · Score: 3, Funny


    I'm sure they are working on a patent that covers the process of applying for a patent.

  2. From the patent application: by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of the inventors is named -

    Thiti Wang-Aryattawanich

    I'd just like to know his nickname, is all...

  3. Re:Well... by Trigun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yep, this is right up there with the Lempel Ziv algorithms, definitely not something that could be done easily with a regex.

  4. Re:Prior art by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it highlight the word 'thousand'. You young whippersnappers, you think you know it all. But it took billions of dollars for MS to figure out how to highlight numbers written as words.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  5. Re:Am I dumb? by kwiqsilver · · Score: 4, Funny

    My guess is that the submitter looked at the pretty pictures and jumped to conclusions.

    No /. poster would ever do such a thing! Especially not if his first glance at the story could show microsoft in a bad light.
    And even if a poster did such a thing, it would never get through /.'s fact checking department.

  6. Wow! Innovative! by rlp · · Score: 4, Funny


    +----------+
    | Amazing! |
    +----------+

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  7. Re:Well... by JavaTHut · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't really tell if the purpose of this post was actually to bash Microsoft, or an elaborate DDOS plot to take out the Patent system by putting a link to its website labeled "microsoft bad" on slashdot.

  8. I've got MS right where I want them... by sRev · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've just patented using letters to form words.

  9. Re:Quick, lets patent DNA! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's right. For example, the military holds a patent on "A gene present in an Ancient space-faring culture, that is used as a security device for preventing alien access to sensitive technological equipment."

    The claims made are:

    "By inserting the gene into a compatible host via a retrovirus, that host becomes capable of using and activating advanced equipment left behind by our now dead anscestors who just happened to invent the Latin language."

    I mean, does that sound rediculous or what? The patent office should go back to requiring working models of an invention as proof! ;-)

  10. bad news/good news by moosesocks · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got some bad news and some good news.

    The bad news is that the USPTO granted Microsoft assanine patent.

    The good news is that we slashdotted the USPTO (and I just saved a bundle on my car insurance)

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  11. Re:Well... by menkhaura · · Score: 4, Funny

    It may look ugly but it's quite simple.

    Aren't the two mutually exclusive?

    It's Perl we are talking about here...

    --
    Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
    Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
  12. Re:Uh oh! by mtdenial · · Score: 5, Funny

    Heh. A close friend of mine is a Canadian patent examiner. A month or two ago, I got an email basically complaining about how the USPTO site was slow. Coincidentally, there was a /. story on patents on the front page. A couple of weeks later, same thing happened. I mentioned it this time and /. gained a new casual reader.

    Not 5 minutes ago, I recieved an email consisting of, and I quote, "Goddamned slashdot linked the USPTO again during work hours, guess I'm staying late today..."

    --
    I assert reality.
  13. Re:Well... by mrdaveb · · Score: 4, Funny

    It may look ugly but it's quite simple.

    Aren't the two mutually exclusive?

    No, I've met quite a few people that are both ugly and simple.
    --
    Homme petit d'homme petit, s'attend, n'avale
  14. Re:Well... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 4, Funny


    Hell, no, they aren't mutually exclusive.

    Look at George Bush.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  15. Re:CSS by egriebel · · Score: 5, Funny
    In any case, I seriously doubt that you'd see this applied to any cases except as a defense.

    Biggest lies ever told (apologies for off-color reference):
    1. The check is in the mail
    2. Don't worry, I won't come in your mouth
    3. We're from the government and we're here to help
    4. This patent is only for defense

    --
    ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
  16. Re:Well... by Tongo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yo mama's so ugly....

    A perl regular expression beat her in a beauty contest!

  17. Re:Well... by NickFortune · · Score: 4, Funny
    Perl's a write-only programming language, after all.

    No it isn't. Although, to be fair, it does have exceptional support for write only programmers

    --
    Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  18. Re:Well... by sraak · · Score: 3, Funny

    i had that idea before you. my lawyers will contact you.