Slashdot Mirror


Google Loses AdWords Case

TheChillPill writes "Google has lost a case brought by a company whose name was being used by Adwords users. Insurance firm GEICO, who had not been using Adwords themselves, objected to Google allowing it's advertisers to use the term in their campaigns." This is a reversal for Google based on an earlier story.

16 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. As a Google fan by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This really saddens me. But it's okay because I just saved a bunch of money on car insurance

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:As a Google fan by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's wrong with you? The ruling is so simple to understand even a caveman gets it.

  2. Lost its case, huh? by RandoX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Should have had a Case Else.

    1. Re:Lost its case, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would have been so much funnier if you'd said "had a default" instead. What the hell is "Case Else"? You kids today with your Visual Basic and your rap music. Get off my lawn, dammit!

  3. But by kevin_conaway · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its understandable seeing as how Geico was losing 15% of its profits.

    1. Re:But by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks, and by way of this post, my Insightful mod will be removed :) Have a nice day.

  4. Are they sure... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they sure that people weren't actually using the word "gecko"? I've heard a lot of people get the two confused.

    --
    ... I'm addicted to placebos
    1. Re:Are they sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mozilla should totally sue Geico for using the word Gecko in their commercial...after all isn't this practically the same thing?

  5. Irony? by IorDMUX · · Score: 4, Funny

    And... and there was a Google AdSense advertisment showing on this very comment page.

    Why, oh /., why?

    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
  6. Re:Bah... by tgd · · Score: 4, Funny

    This pretty much proves the pathetic state of Slashdot. The fact that essentially everyone can not RTFA and apply basic reading comprehension to understand the two are not the same. I can understand that slashdot 5 years ago may have gotten a different result now based on changes in society... But we're talking here about basic reading skills with two stories in a very close proximity in time. I think its time for some educational reform.

    And yes, its you.

  7. Re:I wonder if this is going to broaden... by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess now I don't need to register iwonderhowlongadomainnamecanbe.com.

  8. Re:GEICO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, if they only repaired visible damage, and didn't look at the vehicle, I'm surprised anything got fixed at all.

    Proves Ostriches have the right idea.

  9. Slashdot by dotpavan · · Score: 2, Funny
    Slashdot: news for nerds, stuff that matters, now even better than Cnet, Register and Wired.com

    Statutory Warning: Cnet, Register and Wired are TM of the respective owners, and were used to beef up the ranking and get increased attention.

  10. Evens out in the end by wuice · · Score: 3, Funny

    The bad news is we just lost our lawsuit and now have to cough up damages and legal fees. The good news is I just saved a bunch on my car insurance!

  11. Re:Effective Ad by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Always capitalize Coke when referring to the soft drink.

    Otherwise you may be considered to be misuing the trademark, and/or be considered to be using cocaine. :)

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  12. Re:I wonder if this is going to broaden... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm.. I wonder if I could register 127.0.0.1 as a domain name :)

    (OK I'd have to register '1.com' or something.. interesting idea though).