Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Share Slipped in July for the First Time

prostoalex writes "Between June and July of this year, Firefox lost 0.64% of the users, while Microsoft IE gained the same amount, leaving other browsers at their usual zero point something share. Could recent security problems and lack of stability, reported by some users, lead to the decline of the browser that just passed 80 million downloads?" I think the other thing to remember is that while ~8% seems a lot, there's a still a huge amount of ground to cover -- and a number change like this is statistical noise. I should point out that my issue with noise isn't the absolute numbers; it's the somewhat inadequate measurements tools for this.

9 of 557 comments (clear)

  1. Marketshare Stabilized by Thanatopsis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It looks to me as though Firefox's natural marketshare has stabilized. It's just not a large as we hoped.

    1. Re:Marketshare Stabilized by yfkar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You shouldn't.
      Unless you're a web designer. In that case you'd want them to use anything but IE.

    2. Re:Marketshare Stabilized by AvitarX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because you like designers to use not activex applications.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Marketshare Stabilized by Bullfish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a bit like wailing over a one game losing streak. If the trend continues for six to eight months,then maybe there might be a cause for concern. In the meantime, it's interesting, but not a trend.

  2. Hemos has it right by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is statistical noise, pure and simple. There is no story here.

  3. Re:The reason for the downturn. by superpulpsicle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These statistics came from the summer time technically. Wait till september when people go back to school etc.

  4. Re:How? by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I question these numbers in general.

    Apple has something like a 2% to 4% share of the sales market (depending on who you ask) and something like a 5% to 8% share of active personal computers in use (depending on who you ask).

    Given that nearly all current Apple systems are running OS X, and well over half of them are running Safari, how do they arrive at "Less than 0%" of users for all browsers other than IE and Firefox?

    Even using the most anti-Apple zealotry numbers available, Safari use has gotta be at least 1%.

    I also think Firefox use has got to be a bit higher than the 8% claimed here. Sure, IE is "what's there" on a new Windows installation, but I've yet to meet anybody who actually prefers IE. Sure, I could see some people jumping ship to it when the new version ships (if it even comes close to delivering current promises), but the current state of IE is that it is inferior in almost every way that matters to Firefox.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  5. Re:Noise my ass by ThosLives · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think people are forgetting that a change in market share does not mean a loss in installed base. For instance, if the current total market is 1000 and IE has 900 users and FF has 100, IE has 90% and FF has 10%. Now, let's say the market grows to 2000 and IE has 1850 and FF has 150. The new market shares are 92.5% and 7.5%; FF's market share dropped 2.5%, but their installed base went up 50%.

    Simply looking at market share doesn't tell you anything except for relative adoption with respect to the overall market, and that may or may not even be a useful measurement. It depends on if you care about relative share or absolute adoption, really.

    --
    "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  6. Re:The reason for the downturn. by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first time your average users hit a site that doesn't work with Browser X (be it Mozilla, Firefox, Safari, Amaya or whatever), they will try the first other browser available, which is likely to be IE. And then they'll never look back until they encounter pages that won't work in IE.

    It's unfortunate, and arguably isn't the best thing the users can do, but as long as there's enough sites out there that require IE, users will switch to IE, even from "better" browsers.

    Regards,
    --
    *Art