U.S. Broadband Access Falling Behind
EpochVII writes "FreePress recently released a report(PDF) detailing the woeful situation of U.S. broadband access. From the press release: 'By overstating broadband availability and portraying anti-competitive policies as good for consumers, the FCC is trying to erect a façade of success. But if the president's goal of universal, affordable high-speed Internet access by 2007 is to be achieved, policymakers in Washington must change course.'"
It also doesn't say that the government should build an interstate highway system, subsidize oil companies, or deliver the mail. Yet, here we are.
and having a fraction of the land area and higher population densities had nothing to do with it. Honestly, I don't get otherwise rational people even making the comparison.
The US Government needs to wake up, something needs to be done - and quickly before the US becoes a comsumer digital backwater.....
What does that even mean? I'm sorry, but that sounds just as political and bogus and meaningless as the stuff the other side tosses out. What's a "consumer digital bacwater"? What is the detriment, in real, measurable terms, of not having as rapid broadband penetration as countries a fraction of our size? If I go from 2 Mbps to 10 Mbps, what wonderful things happen?
France Telecom is a government backed monopoly.