Slashdot Mirror


Wi-Fi Times Sixteen

2Stupid2KnowIt writes "eWeek has a cool review of Xirrus' XS-3900 Wireless LAN Array. The unit consists of 16 Integrated Access Points and a wireless switch....all in one device. According to their website, Xirrus can achieve 800+ Mbps of bandwidth and handle 1000+ users. Finally enough bandwidth for us all to cut the cord?"

2 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. Neat by Cytlid · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is really a good idea. From TFA: ...permit only a single concurrent station to connect to each IAP...

    It's a wireless *switch*! Typical wireless deployments are like a hub-- 10, 20, 50 people connecting to the same AP. This is a really cool idea when you think about it. You're bridged solely to your own integrated access point, much like a port is your part on the bridge of a switch.

    I say, get 12 WRT54G's at $60/piece, and a used/refurbed Cisco 2912, for about $200, load up the WRTs with OpenWRT, and you could probably do the a similar thing for about $1000. A little configuration and tweaking might be necessary though.

    Also, don't know about the overlapping channels thing ... that might be a challenge. Like I said, similar, but not identical. Still a neat idea.

    --
    FLR
  2. Re:Location by hattig · · Score: 3, Informative

    They are all directional. In the 16 channel version, the 802.11a channels are directed at 30 degrees to the previous one, and each has a 60 degree spread. That should extend the range a bit - even if the diameter of the total covered area only doubled over using a single AP with an undirected antenna, that is still 4x the area covered. If the diameter of the wireless range was 3x larger, that is 9x the area covered. 4x - 16x more area.

    Anyone here know what range increase is more likely with a solution like this?