Slashdot Mirror


Speculations Intel's Next Generation

An anonymous reader writes "The Inquirer speculates about the next generation Intel chip. It's low power, 64 bit, multi core (up to 16?) and the real reason for the Apple switch."

3 of 329 comments (clear)

  1. A lot like Sun's Niagara by ajiva · · Score: 4, Informative

    To me that sounds a lot like Sun's Niagara box. Huge CMT box (8 cores, 4 threads each, 32 way box). With power consumption around 65watts, but faster than 4way Xeon processors and probably more like an 8way depending on application. Intel probably is moving to something similar, maybe not quite that many cores and threads.

  2. Same fool, same laughs by swissmonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    This article was written by Nicholas Blachford, the same fool who tried to analyze the Cell processor of the PS3 and described it as a supercomputer on a desk while not understanding a single thing about it.

    Seriously, it's worth a read for the laugh, but there's nothing worth believing in it, this guy doesn't know what he's talking about.

  3. Re:Speculations by cbreaker · · Score: 4, Informative

    AGP, by it's design, can only have one per machine.

    It was an add-on specifically designed for the pattern of usage that video cards perform - lots of data out, and short requests in.

    It was a patch to get us by until the "next PCI" came along - but AGP's great performance was also the reason it's taken so long to get PCI Express going; not a lot of demand for something we don't really need. Old PCI slots still provide ample bandwidth for most other types of expansion cards and on the server side you had 64-bit PCI/PCI-X.

    Of course, we still needed PCIe, but it hasn't been a big push. Now, with the dual-video board thing happening, it's definitely helped push the bus into the mainstream.

    As far as the changes in CPU slots, well, I agree to a point. While I believe that both Intel and AMD could have done more to keep slot changes to a minimum, a lot of times the chip-set changes along with the CPU requiring a new board anyways. So, why not upgrade the CPU slot to accommodate the new data patterns of the new architecture?

    I do feel like I own hardware. Software, on the other hand..

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -