Slashdot Mirror
Google Reacts to Splogs
labnol writes "Recently, Mark Cuban of Icerocket made the accusation that Blogger is by far the worst offender when it comes to Spam Blogs. Now Google Blogger is introducing Word Verification for user comments to prevent comment spam and another feature called Flag As Objectionable where users can report blogs with questionable content. Google appears to be listening."
Please neologize without sounding like you're spitting on the floor.
It doesn't get much more spammish or objectionable than that!
No, this is not about reducing spam in the comments on blogs. This is about reducing the number of blogs whose authors post only spam. The number of such blogs is enormous -- most counts put it between half and 2/3.
Lock the barn. Hide you farm animals. The pigs are nervous.
This could lead to more cases like this one.
-- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
Mark Cuban of Icerocket made the accusation that Blogger is by far the worst offender when it comes to Spam Blogs.
Mark Cuban of Icerocket, allow me to introduce you to Roland Piquepaille of Slashdot...
.. Blogger getting bombarded by all sorts of "Questionable Content" flags from all sorts of extremely left / right / PC people ... soon they won't be able to keep up w/ the flags and will just turn off the feature.. :-/
_Vishal www.squad9.com
The number of such blogs is enormous -- most counts put it between half and 2/3.
I'm not sure I'd call any number less than one "enormous".
I once spoke with the VP of a company that was merging with the company I was doing contract work for (both companies were very small, so we had a lunchroom chat).
He revealed that there were a number of "email blast" (ie email spam outsourcers) that were happy to have dozens of Indian employees on staff ready to do the image-word verification and reply-to-this-email-to-be-whitelisted emails many think-they're-super-smart people had set up.
Why does anyone think the "illegitimate" spammers don't do exactly the same thing? Especially when, at $5/hr (about what US min wage is, I think) 5 seconds of effort (an overestimate, most likely, after you've been doing it for an hour) works out to about 2/3rds of a CENT...and that has the potential to reach hundreds of people before someone flags it? ONE worker could do 720 an hour...
Please help metamoderate.
That's like saying convenience stores are the worst offenders in armed robbery. Surely the offender is the perpetrator, not the victim.