Slashdot Mirror
Scientists Create New Human Embryonic Stem Cell
Homework Help writes "U.S. scientists were successful in creating a new human embryonic stem cell. From source, "U.S. researchers said on Monday they have created a new human embryonic stem cell by fusing an embryonic stem cell to an ordinary skin cell.
They hope their method could someday provide a way to create tailor-made medical treatments without having to start from scratch using cloning technology.
That would mean generating the valuable cells without using a human egg, and without creating a human embryo, which some people, including President George W. Bush, find objectionable.
""
Yes, we'll just do that when you bring up Intelligent Design.
Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
from the article:
But because some people object to the destruction of or experimentation on a human embryo, U.S. law restricts the use of federal funds for this kind of research.
Is it US law? What bill did Congress vote on? Oh, that's right, President Bush declared an "executive order". What is the constitutional basis for this? I thought the Legislative Branch was supposed to create the laws, and the Executive Branch enforce them.
Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
Well at least it didn't go something like this:
That would mean generating the valuable cells without using a human egg, and without creating a human embryo, which some people, including President George W. Bush, find objectionable and speaking of which, the grieving mother of a fallen soldier, Cindy Sheehan, who finds Bush just as objectionable is on her way back to the president's crawford ranch.
All Christens worship to the bible.
The bible tells them what they should and shouldn't do and there are some very clearly things they shouldn't do.
-Can't have gay sex
Leviticus 18:22
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
-No women priests
Corinthians 14:34
Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but [they are commanded] to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
And so on, there are 100s of examples of that kind of crap in there.
If someone doesn't believe those things that's their choice, but they're not a Christens if they don't. And further more, claiming to believe those things while claiming to be a Christen makes them look even more stupid for not even know what's in the fucking book they claim to worship.
If they don't believe the things in their holy book why do they still follow it?
Rewrite the thing and start a new religion. Until then, there are 2 options for Christens AS DEFINED BY THEIR BOOK.
1) They are a hateful bunch that disapprove of everyone that doesn't agree with them.
2) Are hypocritical morons that have no idea what they're religion is really based on.
Neither makes them look very good, therefore I have a very good reason to not like them.
Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.