Slashdot Mirror


PSP Usage Lower Than Expected

Next Generation has an article analyzing the numbers of a recent PSP usage survey. Despite a showing that there is strong brand loyalty, the numbers are probably not what Sony was hoping for. From the article: "Most said they had no plans to buy any UMD movies. Less than 50% said they would use the PSP to watch video or view pictures using a memory stick. The figure drops to less than 30% among female users. Sony will be concerned that 50% of users admitted they had not touched their PSP in 'some time'. 25% of male users have updated their PSP for Internet use, with only 10% of female users doing same."

19 of 141 comments (clear)

  1. Why? by Tadrith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a hard time understanding how Sony ever thought this was going to take off in the first place.

    Why does Sony think I want to buy my movies twice?

    1. Re:Why? by Gogo0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      VHS to DVD: People re-bought their movies for signifigantly increased quality and features

      DVD to HD-DVD: People will re-buy their movies for signifigantly increased quality and features

      DVD to PSP: People will re-buy their movies for signifigantly increased quality and features -er, I mean
      People will not re-by their movies for signifigantly reduced quality and picture size with next to no features.

      Sony thinks you want to buy your movies twice because many of us do; enough to create a market for re-releasing everything on DVD now and a HD format later and on whatever is after that. They didnt seem to understand WHY people did it, though: because the new ones are better. The PSP ones arent better. Theyre worse! They cost more! They only play on a PSP!
      They give you less for more money and then they lock down the way you can use it. Nice.

      I am glad that I got a PSP with the free Spiderman 2 UMD. Otherwise I would have wasted good money on another UMD just to find out I dont want any.

    2. Re:Why? by webrunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [quote]DVD to HD-DVD: People will re-buy their movies for signifigantly increased quality and features
      [/quote]

      I disagree here. HD-DVD/Blu Ray is not 'significantly increased quality', and there really aren't any inherently better features to it.

      VHS to DVD added crystal clarity and not having to rewind and no degredation over time, no tracking, etc. etc etc.

      HD-DVD and Blu Ray are just.. slightly better DVDs. Maybe MORE features, and yeah you've got a higher resolution, but nobody would ever consider DVD quality to be blurry. There's no inherent advantage to HD-DVD other than HD and More Space.

      This is why I dont think very many people are going to accept HD-DVD or Blu Ray. That, and there's going to be two- if both dont fail then one will, and people will want to wait until that happens.

      --
      ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
    3. Re:Why? by GoRK · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would like an HD disc format for the simple reason that I want a decent, and cheap format to store and exchange the things I shoot and produce with my HD camcorder. I could care less about buying movies in HD (Thouth if I had a player I certaily would buy them.) Even though there are a few HD recording formats that actually are available to consumers right now (DVHS, WVHS, HDV) they are either special purpose, expensive, or may not be a good future-proof-for-the-next-12-months choice.

      A lot of people make the same argument as the parent post -- that nobody will buy HD discs because there aren't that many people with HDTV's, but you see, the thought process for consumers is completely the other way around. People are not buying HDTV's because there's very little to watch on them. The introduction of an HD disc-based format and players and the sudden influx of HD content at or about the same price as the DVD content will drive the uptake of HDTV's. For some stupid reason the manufacturers have tried to force the market to do the opposite and buy the HDTV's first.

      A more appropriate comparison might be to look at the way that consumers have progressed through their equipment as the recording formats have changed in the past. When DVD was introduced, the picture quality was really (and arugably still isn't) above high-end VHS, so it certainly did not drive people to purchase better television sets... yet people DID! Many people were driven to purchase 16:9 TV's to better enjoy the widescreen formats that DVD offered, and many purchased larger TV's to have a more cinema-like experience at home as the price of discs was reduced. Likewise, before the introduction of DVD, multichannel audio in the home was almost nonexistant. Some people had sprung for 'surround sound' setups offering Dolby ProLogic, but they were few and far between and the actual experience was somewhat lackluster... But look at how DVD's drove the adoption of 5.1 audio setups -- even though a really superior stereo setup will probably sound better to a listener than a cheap 5.1 setup, people are buying them up as fast as they can make them. Car manufacturers are even advertising 5.1 audio for backseat DVD systems. Seriously -- 5.1 audio in the car?!? Although when the car is parked inside in a garage, it's arguably one of the best spaces to use a multichannel audio setup, you can't hear the difference over the road noise!

  2. Wow by ValuJet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who would've thought that people wouldn't pay more to watch a movie on a 4.3 inch display rather than just buying the DVD and watching it wherever they please.

  3. This makes sense. by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 4, Informative
    The UMD usage isn't surprising; who wants to pay that much for a movie when you can get it on DVD with more features, better quality, and a price that's equal to or lower than the cost of the UMD?

    The same goes for pictures; I don't know about you, but I don't think I'd ever have any need to look at pictures on a PSP. The screen on digital cameras fulfills that need nicely.

    The games are a bigger issue. Lack of interesting or good games seems to be the problem here, although Sony has time to change that.

    Bottom line? We've heard all of this before, and what we haven't is common sense.

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  4. Who wants UMD?? by AcheronHades · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only time I really see the point in watching a movie on your PSP is when you are traveling. But then if you travel that much, your probably have a laptop, on which you can watch every DVD in your collection.

    My biggest issue with buying UMD movies though is that I can only use them on the PSP... Thats not good enough for me.

  5. On DRM by Digital_Quartz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here, I think, we see the real reason why companies like Sony and other big studios are making such a big deal about DRM and copy protection; it has nothing to do with piracy. The studios aren't stupid, and they all know, just like we do, that piracy is not a real problem (or at least, the kind of casual copying that DRM protects against is not a real problem. DRM does nothing to stop internet trading, nor to stop the kind of mass-scale piracy we see in countries like China).

    DRM is all about getting the casual consumer, who can't get around the DRM, to buy their movies on DVD, then re-buy them on HD-DVD, and re-buy them on UMD, and re-buy them on whatever other formats they can come out with.

    Sony is now discovering that people, for some strange unfathomable reason, don't want to pay for the same movie more than once.

  6. game support by beowulfy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I find this un-suprising given the lack of a decent game library at the present time. The driving force behind any successful gamming device launch is of course, great games, which the PSP sorely lacks at the moment. I'm more suprised that sony execs. thought that the UMD movie sales would somehow make up for this. I think if the PSP can improve the quality of its available games by christmas, it should be ok. What it needs right now is a big hit of a game, thats unavailable anywhere else.

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -Hunter S. Thompson
  7. Games by Profcrab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is not suprising that there is a lull now in the PSPs growth as a system. The initial "wow" of the system is over and now it really needs to build its base of games. The movies and other features are all supplementary to the games. The UMD movies are a small market because very few people are going to buy the same movie twice. Once for DVD, which will be people's first consideration, and once for UMD. Sony now has to invest heavily into growing the library of games available for it.

    When they do their first price cut for the system will be a good gauge of how the system is doing. Right now, I think that they shouldn't be too disappointed. Unless they dont have the games lined up, of course.

  8. Simple Ansewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing cost way too much money - plus the games and movies are over priced. WHy are there no good launch titles. Sorry but im not spending $50 on Lumines come on now - its 2005 not 1995. Why are the movies priced higher then DVDs??

  9. Launched in a hurry... by malchus6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They definitely should of waiting until a larger game library would be available before the launch. I think this is clearly a case of Sony not wanting Nintendo to have an even greater amount of lead time than it had.

    I think Nintendo might win the war on this round of handhelds (yet again). Their games are more fun so far, and with the launch of Nintendogs (which appears annoying to me at first, but it was kinda fun after 5 minutes), it will attract a MUCH larger casual and female gaming audience than the PSP. Thats where i think Sony will lose the war on PSP, they might get more on the hardcore gaming market, but casual and female gamers will make a big difference.

    Not to mention the DS is still about half the price of the PSP...

    --
    You can fool some of the people all of the time ... and those are the ones you should concentrate on.
  10. Some hints for sony: by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most said they had no plans to buy any UMD movies.

    Hint: Charge a lot less for them! Hell, sell them for $2 when you buy the full DVD as well.. They don't have the same utility as a DVD, so you can't charge the same price.

    ony will be concerned that 50% of users admitted they had not touched their PSP in 'some time'.

    Hint: Come out with some new games! We've all played the launch titles. While you're at it, put a $35 price cap on them. Handheld games aren't worth more than that.

    25% of male users have updated their PSP for Internet use, with only 10% of female users doing same

    Hint: Don't disable functionality with your updates if you want your users to apply them.

    Hint 2: Don't ship your product before it's finished. Most people are too lazy to upgrade.

    I love my PSP, but Sony needs to pull their heads out of their asses.

  11. I've had a PSP since February... by GTRacer · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...and I went through about two months where I only used if for MP3's if at all. The one and only UMD game I own is Untold Legends, which is fun, and I got my money's worth out of it.

    However, once I discovered emu and homebrew, I've been using it every day. I have ROMs for all the NES and SNES games I own, and I have the Tenchi no Mon browser and pVNC also. It's amazing driving to work, scanning for networks the whole way...

    I feel a little bad for Sony because I only have three more planned UMD game purchases - MGA, GTA and GT4M. Until they deliver the RPG goodness (FF3 and Ultima Exodus is fun enough for now) then I don't think they'll be getting much more money from me.

    On PSP purchases anyway. I just bought my 101st PS2 game last week (Atelier Iris)...

    GTRacer
    - Needs another lifetime to complete the RPGs

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  12. Re:Sony Meeting. by mopslik · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sony Executive 1: ... More Madden and Grand Theft Auto!

    Sony Executive 4 (from the back): I've got it! Now hear me out on this. People love Madden. And people have spent millions on our "Grand Thief Auto" series.

    Sony Executive 2: "Theft".

    Sony Executive 4: No, they really bought it! Anyway, here's what I'm thinking... "Grand Thief Madden"! You have this super hip character, right? And he takes things and stuff, kind of like a thief. And there's this really cool narration thing going on, doing a play-by-play of the things he's taking. You know, cars and trucks and stuff.

    Sony Executive 3: Like "Grand Theft Auto"?

    Sony Executive 4: "Otto", sure, whatever. His name is irrelevant. The point is that he takes stuff and Madden does the calls. Like he'll take a bike and Madden will say "Hey folks, look here, 'Otto' just took a bike!" or whatever.

    Sony Executive 1 (to all): You hear that, boys? Why couldn't you come up with this during the focus meeting? Go with it!

  13. Game quality by Winterblink · · Score: 3, Informative

    There was an interesting point made on Xplay a while back (say what you will about that show, personally I don't mind it). The point was that even though the DS has a larger game library than the PSP, the number of quality games that each platform has is roughly equal.

    I own a PSP, and I know people with the DS. I'm still enjoying the games I have for my PSP, and by and large they're still enjoying their DS games. But for the most part they've ignored a lot of the games they've bought in favor of Advance Wars or Nintendogs now. Meanwhile I'm enjoying the new 2.0 firmware update and the games I bought when the unit launched, as well as some of the ones that have been released subsequently.

    I prefer the PSP over the DS because of its features, not just the games.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  14. Re:We're not there yet by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think it is so much a matter of people not wanting movies on such a small display, it's a matter of not wanting to pay so much for them. Here are my reasons why the PSP failed:

    1) UMD movies cost way too much. They have no special features and are viewed on a very small screen, and people probably already own them. They should cost $10 or less.

    2) Movie playing is crippled, both by overpriced memory cards that cost twice as much as other flash media, and by sony's arbitrary limits on resolutions (User-created videos can't run fullscreen because sony doesn't want them to).

    3) The game library sucks. There are barely any games, most existing games are rehashes of existing PS2 games, and all games are overpriced.

    Here is how Sony can fix each of the three:

    1) Make UMDs cheap, or include them for free with DVDs.

    2) Drop prices on memory sticks until they are in line with MMC and SD cards. There is no reason for a 1GB memory stick pro duo to cost twice as much as an SD card of the same capacity. In addition, remove all arbitrary limitations on permitted formats. Users should be able to encode their video at full screen resolution if they so choose.

    3) The first step is to drop game prices by $10 to $20 each, accross the board. The second step is to drop the price further for games that are simply rehashes of PS2 games. The third step is to convince third party developers to put out games for the PSP. Sony may need to provide financial incentive to get developers to put out PSP games, such as discounts on licencing fees, or gauruntees that the game will sell X copies or Sony will compensate the developer. Something, anything.

    It should also be pointed out that Nintendo's Play Yan brings a lot of the PSP's functionality to the DS, by allowing it to play pretty high quality videos on the DS (albeit at GBA resolution of 240x160), as well as MP3s, at a cost of about $50 US. The future for DS homebrew is also in better shape, because current homebrew solutions rely on hardware (the PassMe or equivalent) and Nintendo isn't doing anything to prevent it like Sony is. Yes, the PSP might have more power for homebrew stuff than the DS, but the point is moot since PSP homebrew specifically requires hardware that is no longer on sale.

    Sony has made a string of bad decisions on the PSP, and now they're paying the price. They were too arrogant in thinking that people would put up with higher prices and silly restrictions.

  15. Underutilized by sc0ttyb · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I was one of the first people to get one when they came out (yeah, I'm one of those guys) and bought Lumines with it. I played the ever-loving CRAP out of that game before I thought, "Okay, what's next?" The problem is the same with the DS: they just launched without a good selection of titles. Lumines was great and Wipeout was cool, too, but then I started wanting more games to play. I got a copy of Hot Shots Golf and played the crap out of that. There's just nothing going on with the console right now.

    They would make a killing if they released a Best Of collection of well-loved PS1 games, like Castlevania: Symphony of the Night (I'd buy that in a heartbeat), the original Tomb Raider, and even a few Resident Evils.

    They should also work on porting PS2 games to the PSP, as that was what I thought it was originally going to be used for primarily. If they offered ports for a bargain price (or even a discount if you already bought the original PS2 title) then they'd sell like crazy. I loved the GBA's Classic series, and I think they could do the same thing on the PSP.

    You know what games are particularly suited for handhelds? Shmups. Your Contra and Gradius type games would do well on the PSP, especially with the built-in WiFi to play with a buddy. I'm not so much a fan of multiplayer fullsize console games, but I do think that handhelds, especially this one, lend themselves to a multiplayer style of play.

    Am I glad I bought a PSP? Sure. I've gotten a ton of enjoyment out of it, but the console is still in its infancy. The PS2 didn't really start seeing great stuff until 1-2 years after it was released, so this should be no different. We'll see!

    --
    "Apparently so, but suppose you throw a coin enough times. Suppose one day, it lands on its edge."
  16. Wow I'm lucky I didn't buy that load of crap by gameboyhippo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Normally I like to own every game console. I have to rationalize why not to buy a game system when it comes out. Like the XBox. I didn't buy it because it only produced games that would appeal to 14 - 35 year old bachelors (who are as clueless about girls as the developers of those games). I think I can count all the XBox exclusives I want on one hand.

    With the PSP, it was even easier to rationalize why not to get it. It did the opposite of everything I want a handheld game console to do!

    #1. Affordability. Handheld consoles should be cheaper and so should the games. I bought Nitendogs the other day for $30. Had this been a PSP game, it would have cost $50.

    #2. There are no G rated UMD movies. After awhile, you'll probably find a decline in E rated games as well. The demographics are going to change for the PSP to be a hardcore gamer only console since the family gamer can't afford it.

    #3. I don't want to be forced to buy bells & whistles. If I want to buy a movie, it's going to be DVD. Why should I be forced to buy a UMD player that I'm not going to use?

    If Sony wants my buisness, they should lower the price of the PSP and come out with a strong line of family centered games. Sure they can't release awesome titles like Nintendogs or Kirby's Canves Curse, but they can make their own 1st party family centric game division.

    Oh, and there is a glitch in the posting. If you enter your username, and password, and don't write a body, it'll log you in without having to type in the secret word.