Slashdot Mirror


Vanilla Kernel 2.6 Stability vs 2.4?

chromis asks: "I am a 'Linux-from-scratch' like Linux user. I maintain my system for almost 4 years that way. I'm still using kernel 2.4, and I'm a little bit afraid for updating to 2.6 because of the problems like stability issues, driver subsystem problems, etc. I once tried 2.6.0 a long time ago, but I experienced random freezes which I could not diagnose. We all know about the development model issues, and I often read complaints about current kernel development practices. Now that kernel 2.6.13 is out, I really want to ask Slashdot: if you are a vanilla 2.6 kernel user, how are your experiences with these plain kernel.org 2.6 kernels? Is it really as bad as some people claim, or is 2.6 only usable when using a distro from a large vendor like Red Hat, SuSE, etc? I really would like to upgrade to the new vanilla 2.6 kernel eventually, but I'm a little hesitant. Any advice?"

4 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. This I know by xactuary · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am running the older kernel and it kept me from getting first post.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  2. Seems ok. by ColaMan · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've used various incarnations of 2.6 on my mythtv box. It's under fairly high load, with memory, video and disk intensive processes, has high PCI utilisation (2 capture cards, sometimes running at once). It runs 24/7, sometimes hot enough to get the CPU temp alarm beeping.

    Number of times it's had a kernel panic over the last year? Zero. Good enough for me.

    And as other posters have said, the advantages with hardware, latency patches, acpi support help too.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
    1. Re:Seems ok. by LordoftheWoods · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is an LFS user. Hassle is desirable. So yea, he definately needs it.

  3. Something doesn't add up here... by bergeron76 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're an LFS Linux user ("Linux-from-scratch like" Linux user as you put it), and you're concerned about upgrading your kernel?

    Since you cross-compiled and built your libraries, compiler, toolchain, etc from scratch, why are you worried about upgrading your kernel? Surely, you know that it's trivial to modify your boot loader so you can boot multiple kernels and try them out without consequence to your system.

    Second, why are you interested in using a Vanilla 2.6 kernel if you built your entire Linux system from scratch?

    Please pardon me if I'm mistaken, but you certainly don't sound like a 'tweaker'. Your question is analogous to: "I'm a die hard car tuner, I've modded my hotrod and tweaked my cam's, changed my gear ratios and added 2 inches to my manifold: Should I use premium gasoline in my new Hot Rod?"

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.