Slashdot Mirror
Blocking a Nation's IP Space
SComps writes "The Register has a good commentary about blocking Chinese IP space and some of the pros and cons surrounding that action. The question I post to Slashdot: "What is your opinion of this and what do you propose to help correct this?" Additionally, what sort of actions do other Slashdot users take to protect themselves from rogue IP space, be it national borders or even retail broadband/dialup providers such as wannadoo or comcast, roadrunner, etc?" The author of the article raises an interesting point, will this 'slippery slope' prove too difficult to walk?
As a chinese American, I feel that these tensions between the USA and China are unnecessary, many things about China are sometimes overstated. For example, last summer I visited China, expecting to see many US sites blocked by the Great firewall, but instead do not see things like that. I did not encounter any websites that seemed to be blocked. Also, many Chinese can read English, so I also feel it's unfair to block Chinese users from some websites.
Student Research and Development
The point of refusing access from certain IP addresses is not to deny service to any particular individual (or nationality, in case of entire countries being affected), but to protect against likely abuse and encourage individuals to use some other IP address. As long as your boycott is aimed at their network infrastructure (for aiding abuse) rather than at the country itself (for political reasons), individual users routing their traffic via other networks is not a problem; it's what you want them to do. The idea is that the secondary network will sort out the abuse (by making sure they know who their customers are, or by other means). If they fail to do so, they will be blacklisted too.
Therefore I see no point in specifically blacklisting any single country, if not for political reasons. Entire countries are blacklisted because they conveniently map to large portions of IP address space. Some Chinese universities probably received their IP blocks before the commercial operators did, and may therefore have addresses in completely separate ranges. If the universities are a bit better at managing their networks, and the bulk of the abuse therefore comes from the commercial blocks, there is no reason both should be listed merely for being assigned to the same country.
Likewise, a single address block may contain several operators in different countries, causing them all to be blacklisted simply because telling them apart takes too much time. It's all about network abuse history, not about nationality. And, I wouldn't have to rely on everyone else blocking a single abused network either, unless they all were to forward that abuse to me.
I have however considered blocking mail servers indiscriminately "bouncing" virus messages having our domain forged onto them, when they have received those messages from IP addresses (often Chinese ones) already included in public blacklists. They could avoid such action on my part by simply using said blacklists themselves, but exactly how they solve their problem is up to them. If they simply avoid "notifying" innocent people every time they receive junk mail or other abuse, I will not bother them.
I worked for an ISP for about 5 years... started doing tech support and moved up and on to the NOC and web design. While in the NOC were were fighting spam for our users pretty much non-stop with various black lists / filters. My job was basically to come in each day and clean out the garbage disposal as it were.
Until the glorious day we segragated our mail users. We set up a new beta mail server and split our users into two groups. Those needing international mail, and those not needing it. Over the course of 3 months, we informed users of the change and provided an easy opt-in one-click process to make sure they could send/recieve international mail.
After that grace period, we simply shut off international mail on our main server by blocking any IP space outside the US.
The load on our mail servers (4 dual CPU machines) went from averaging around 50% down to 5% and stayed there.
In our polling of our own customers, we found that 90% or more of them never had any intention or desire to send/recieve international mail. Our spam load went from several thousand spam messages a minute to less than a thousand per day.
The people that needed international mail were put on the new server and left open to all mail.
For the next few months, the staff at our office didn't have to buy lunch or snacks because that corny AOL commercial actually happened. We had customers in all the time taking us out to lunch and dropping off brownies, cupcakes, etc... our satifaction rate was never higher and I would venture to guess that we would not have been that loved had we sent everyone $50 cash.
Why isn't this a more popular choice? Is there really that much of a NEED in the general internet population for international mail? There wasn't at our company.
I think we could make international mail a feature add-on much like web hosts make CGI, PHP, or mySQL a feature add-on. Sure, to me those are just staples, but not everyone needs all that.
Sure, there's still in-country spam sources... but NOTHING like what comes from outside.
[ http://www.dvigroup.net/self ]
Alrighty, then, troll feeding time!
230 years ago, this nation I live in was under a (different) "despotic regime" - some people decided to take some action, and it changed. The assistances they received happened after they started, not because they whined.
As an individual internet user, I have not ever blocked an email from a political dissident due to its political content. As a website author, I have not blocked anyone from viewing my site.
As a businessman, I respect and obey the laws governing my use of advertising online, by email (I fully comply with CAN-SPAM) and other means as applicable.
The above said, anyone who cannot see fit to play by the same rules can go figure out a different game *elsewhere*, instead of trying to play some bait (political freedom of speech) and switch (illegal spam serving) game.
There is no "divine right" nor requirement to maintain a web presence, to maintain completely open networks, to provide a podium upon which some poor abused oppressed individual can spout their issues to everyone else, no matter how "justified" they might be.... This whole intarweb thing borders so closely to being completely fictional it isn't funny - please *do* seek to force your beliefs concerning how things *should* be onto the current way things are - only time will tell how successful you were.
Please *don't* consider the over-worked net administrators as enemies: The real enemies are those spam servers who bury any legitimate content coming out of dissenting China more effectively than any locally-applied blocks ever could.
Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
If your website is hackable from China or Russia it's hackable from the US.
If your website is not hackable from the US it's not hackable from China or Russia.
So, why are you blocking China and Russia but not the US?
Watch this Heartland Institute video