OSDL CEO: Microsoft Has to Accept Linux
PenguinCandidate writes "The OSDL's Stuart Cohen has been in the news lately following a clandestine meeting with Microsoft about a dubiously independent TCO study; a study that has since been rejected by the OSDL. The idea of an independent Windows/Linux TCO comparison may be dead, but did Cohen have an additional card up his sleeve?
In this interview, Cohen states that while he "awaits the reply from MS's Martin Taylor on the results of his internal investigation" into how an off-the-record meeting became public, he will continue to promote his belief that MS will eventually have to accept Linux as customer demand increases."
Did he meet the MS fellow in a parking garage at night after carefully placing a flag in a potted plant on his patio, then receiving the "meet" time in his delivered newspaper?
You can't talk about Wikipedia's flaws on Wikipedia
First was IBM's results claiming Linux TCO was lowest, now it doesn't matter!?
OK, let's base it off something else...maybe security? Oh wait, I got it, who has the easiest to configure applications?
No...it has to be something more. Maybe we should see who has the better mascot. I think that's Linux, considering Windows doesn't really have a mascot; although personally I think I'd vote for Windows is their mascot was a caricature of Bill Gates getting pied in the face.
IGB: More fun than eating oatmeal!
- Denial
- Anger
- Bargaining
- Depression
- Ultimate Acceptance
Microsoft is somewhere around 3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_stages_of_grief
Exactly when did hell freeze over?!
The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
Given the networks of tens or hundreds of thousands of zombie Windows computers, it is clear that the Total Cost to 0wn (TC0) some AOL user's Windows PC is very, very low.
I doubt you can 0wn a Linux box as cheaply.
Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.