Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Intel Replies to AMD Antitrust Lawsuits

Posted by Zonk on from the let's-get-it-on dept.

pr1000 writes "The New York Times is reporting today that Intel has replied sharply to AMD's lawsuit. This lawsuit sounds like it will be a bruiser." From the article: "The claims are factually incorrect and contradictory...The evidence will show that every failure and setback for which A.M.D. today seeks to blame Intel is actually a direct result of A.M.D.'s own actions or inactions."

2 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. A bruiser? by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 5, Funny

    More like a playground argument.

    "You did it!"
    "No YOU did it!"
    "No YOU did it!"
    repeat ad nauseam

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  2. Took them nine weeks? by kihjin · · Score: 4, Funny
    Intel's formal response came nine weeks after A.M.D. accused Intel of unfair pricing and rebates, and of coercing customers to prevent them from using A.M.D. microprocessors. At 63 pages, the Intel rebuttal was 15 pages longer than the lawsuit itself.
    ... time for an upgrade?
    --
    This slashdot-related signature is a stub. You can help kihjin by expanding it.