Slashdot Mirror


Cost of Secrecy Continues to Increase

xerid writes "The Associated Press is running an article about the increasing costs of government secrecy. The information stems from a report (PDF Warning) posted at OpenTheGovernment.org. From the article: 'The government is withholding more information than ever from the public and expanding ways of shrouding data. Last year, federal agencies spent a record $148 creating and storing new secrets for each $1 spent declassifying old secrets, a coalition of watchdog groups reported Saturday. That's a $28 jump from 2003 when $120 was spent to keep secrets for every $1 spent revealing them.'"

12 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    $148! I can't believe the government spent that little on anything.

    1. Re:Wow by digitalchinky · · Score: 3, Funny

      So now you Americans are paying 148 bucks for black marker pens at the rate of one per document : )

      Over on this side of the world (Australia) we're still paying $10,000 per hammer, so I guess it's all relative given exchange rates and all...

  2. No Surprise by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Funny

    With so many of the government services running on Windows, it comes as no surprise that the cost of keeping secrets secret is ever increasing.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  3. for now on by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Funny

    i am only supporting OpenSource/GPLed governments...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  4. who released this information? by big+whiffer · · Score: 3, Funny

    i thought it was supposed to be secret?

  5. It's not $128:$1 by AFairlyNormalPerson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't let the figures fool you.

    The real figure is $3:$1.

    The other $123 went towards buying the hammers and wrenches that they claim to spend $500 for - which they don't - those $500 aren't spent on the hammers and wrenches - it is actually used towards funding the stuff that they are trying to keep secret in the first place.
    It shouldn't be much of a secret though that the secret is this crazy scheme of keeping secrets.

    Got it?

  6. wtf by briancurtin · · Score: 2, Funny

    i keep secrets for free. these "secrets" they are paying $148 for will get leaked. they need to find a new secret keeper.

    --
    My UID is a palindrome, that must be good for some type of prize.
  7. Re:The real question by ShakiirNvar · · Score: 2, Funny
    Possibly the whole state bureaucracy, whole state machine is just like a Windows installation. It degrades over time and at some point you have to re-install from scratch.
    Now there's an idea I like, deleting the current government and creating a new one from scratch ...
    --
    "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public." - HL Mencken
  8. Is it sustainable? by Weezul · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly one can classify almost everything, but this will have major economic costs eventually. If your society competes with an open society which does not pay secrecy costs, execpt on a few things it does not want you to know about, can your society survive?

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  9. Re:Catch 22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Lenny: Shhh, it's a secret!

    Karl: Shut Up!

  10. Nothing odd about the figure. by raehl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Steps for submitting an article on Slashdot:

    1) Figure out what you want people to believe.

    (The government is hoarding secrets!)

    2) Find the single figure that appears to most severely support your position.

    ($148 spent classifying secrets per $1 spent declassifying secrets.)

    3) Hope nobody notices that your figure is utter bullshit.

  11. The reason by suricatta · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd tell you why the government spends so much on keeping secrets, but it's classified.