Slashdot Mirror


PayPal to Offer Micropayments

lazarus corporation writes "According to a press release on shareholder.com, PayPal are introducing micropayments processing fees for digital goods. Will this allow musicians to do away with record companies completely and successfully sell their own music online?" It looks geared to be the under $2 area and not the couple of pennies area, so I think calling it "Micropayments" is a bit much, but it's something. Still amazing that in 2005 nobody has figured out a way to make it simple to charge a penny on-line.

18 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. 10% Charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The new fees will enable merchants to process payments at a rate of 5 percent plus 5 cents per transaction.

    So for $0.99 it will still take a 10% fee.

    Bastards.

    1. Re:10% Charge by qwp · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes, but you have to look at the system as of now.
      Right now you pay 30 cents plus a % of the sale.

      I run a dollar/month hosting company, and 35% of every monthly sale goes to paypal. Which the way I setup the system, is just the hit I take. I've accepted that because the hosting company isn't setup to make gobs of money, it's just ment to support designers and provide a better service. With this new micropayment structure I could earn 25% more each month, without doing a single change.

      Yes it is still evil, but hey I just had to sign up for a free paypal account to start running accounts through. I'd rather pay 500 dollars over 3 years than 300 dollars up front for a system.

  2. Bitpass has had micropayments for a long time by RhettR · · Score: 5, Informative

    BitPass has had micropayments for some time... the catch is you have to buy at least $3 credits, but then you can pay those anonymously to websites in increments as small as one cent.

  3. Paypal seizes $27K of Hurricance Katrina Red Cross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Paypal just siezed $27,000 of aid going to the Red Cross from SomethingAwful.com users - I'd say thats reason enough to cancel if you haven't already been royally screwed by them...

  4. Re:Transaction Costs by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 4, Informative

    How long do you think the sites will leave their money sitting on PayPal, though?

    I understand that PayPal's solution is quite different from Slashdot's solution; PayPal is banking on $0.50-$2.00 - type transactions and Slashdot is a penny a page. The latter style (CmdrTaco's comment) is what I was talking about.

    PayPal may be uniquely positioned to provide such a service, as they already provide some aspects of the needed technology.

    As Taco mentioned, though, the real test of "micropayments" is not under $2.00, but rather under $0.10. The markets are likely quite different though. This 5% plus 5 cents could work for a variety of small transactions.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  5. e-gold and other alternatives have lower fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This announcement puts PayPal fees for sub USD2 payments at 5% + USD0.05. Here is a comparison of fees in USD for various "micropayments" vs. e-gold http://www.e-gold.com/ fees.

    0.25 PayPal 0.0625 e-gold 0.0154
    0.75 PayPal 0.0875 e-gold 0.0404
    1.00 PayPal 0.1000 e-gold 0.0529
    1.50 PayPal 0.1250 e-gold 0.0724
    2.00 PayPal 0.1500 e-gold 0.0786

    There is a page that shows how many of these
    payments e-gold is processing here http://stats.e-gold.com/. Looks like in the
    last 24 hours it was somewhere between 10,000
    and 20,000.

    Other similar alternatives include Pecunix http://www.pecunix.com/, 1MDC http://www.1mdc.com/, and E-Bullion http://www.e-bullion.com/.

  6. Micropayments aren't new by Alioth · · Score: 4, Informative
    Still amazing that in 2005 nobody has figured out a way to make it simple to charge a penny on-line.

    Micropayments were available in the mid to late 1980s on Prestel and Micronet (a British pre-world wide web online service). "Information providers" on Prestel/Micronet could have free pages, or pages that cost money to view from 1 penny and up. In 1986, I was buying and downloading games for my Sinclair Spectrum for a reasonable discount over going to the shop and buying the same game on tape. Multi-user games such as Shades were paid for using micropayments (1 penny increments). You could rent Gallery pages (a bit like making your own home page on the web today) by using this system.

    Of course with Prestel/Micronet it was easy since Prestel just added the charges to your bill quarterly. However, there's no reason why PayPal couldn't have done the same for PayPal user to PayPal user transactions since they wouldn't have to interact with any banking institutions to do it, so really it's boo on PayPal for taking so long to actually make this happen.
  7. Already been done by... by OpenYourEyes · · Score: 4, Informative

    About... oh... six or eight years ago, there was a company that was founded which had a great online payment scheme that would handle micropayments without problems. Instead of charging a per-transaction fee, it would make money on the float of withdrawing a larger sum from your bank account, not giving you interest on that ammount, and letting you tap into it whenever. Putting money back in your account that was transferred to you could take a couple of days, since they wanted to earn the float money. The company even had a way to do micropayments by beaming data from PDA to PDA, and were planning on a cell-phone version of the same thing. Eventually, they abandoned this system, abandoned the PDA and cell phone systems, and just about abandoned their customers. They switched to a transaction fee system, got bought by a bank, focused on auction transactions, and eventually were bought by eBay. This company was called PayPal.

  8. Paypal == Evil by 1s44c · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sooner or later paypal shaft everyone they deal with. They are the SCO of the banking world.

    They freeze funds and keep the money whenever they feel like it, they take random amounts out of peoples credit cards whenever they feel like it, and they send a pack of lies to their debt collection agencies about their own customers whenever they feel like it.

    Warning from real life experience, DON'T DEAL WITH PAYPAL!!

  9. Re:Tell me more? by jhalme · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, the SA servers are now back online again so you can read Lowtax tell the story himself;

    http://www.somethingawful.com/

  10. Is this NEW? by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    I haven't followed all the various changes in PayPal's offering, but when it was originally introduced, one of the scenarios they explicitly mentioned in their FAQ was one in which you sent a nickel to each of a hundred friends.

    When you sent the nickel, they would hit your credit card for $5, your friend would get a nickel "in" their PayPal account, and you'd end up with $4.95 "in" your PayPal account. The next 99 nickels would all come out of your PayPal account.

    Haven't you been able to do this all along?

  11. This has been done by peppercoin by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Peppercoin has already worked out a way to cheaply (i.e. transaction costs are much less than 1 cent)and securely do micropayments.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  12. Re:Stuff that matters? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Informative

    They shut down the account without any warning, were not contactable and their automated system for reinstatement did not work.

    When they were finally contacted they refused to release the money for 9 days, and stated that as they have an exclusive contract with United Way they can't authorize charity payments to the red cross.

    So instead they refunded all the money - *minus* all their transaction fees... so paypal made a nice tidy sum and the people in new orleans got zip.

    Nice company.

  13. Re:Transaction Costs by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have been especially selected for our FREE Apostrophe 101 course.

    We recommend that you pay particular attention to module 3...

    It's "fees", not "fee's" and "cents" not "cent's". Although you managed to work out how to pluralise "thing", "sale" and "cost" and even "micropayment" correctly.

    4 out of 6 plurals correct... Well done, but do try harder next time... :)

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  14. Re:Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Name an alternative.

    www.paypalsucks.com/options.shtml

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Re:Tell me more? by toad3k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fark linked to sa's post, and in the comments there are a surprising amount of people with bad experiences.

    http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink =1653706

    And of course there's always the venerated paypalsucks.com

  17. Re:Stuff that matters? by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently you never heard from the thousands of people who Paypal has screwed over, an example of which was illustrated by this recent story. I never use Paypal anymore, and haven't for many years. I'm still alive.