Slashdot Mirror


New Tool to Track Kernel Testing Time

mu22le writes "Andrea Arcangeli has created a new tool, 'klive', to automatically track the amount of testing that each kernel gets before release. According to Kernel Traffic "There was some discussion [on making it a kernel config option] that public perception might put this in the "spyware" category", but still the ability to track a kernel usage and reliability would be valuable to both developers and users."

7 of 98 comments (clear)

  1. What are they testing? by ReformedExCon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They seem to be taking system stats and system uptimes and presenting it in a hard to understand table. Is that tracking testing?

    If I turn on my computer and don't touch it for a year, it will have excellent uptime, but it doesn't really test very much. Same too, if I just start up Apache and let it do its thing.

    Testing is a very important part of any development cycle and testing metrics are very useful in determining the quality of the delivered product. However, I've never heard of "testing time" used as a metric. Maybe "coverage" or "bugs over time", but the amount of time itself is never really a concern.

    From what I've seen of the Linux kernel (just downloading the source from kernel.org and browsing through it), there doesn't seem to be much in the way of actual debug code thoughtfully and diligently placed throughout the code. There are a few litterings of debug code here and there, but for the most part, it seems like the developers just expect it to work without error.

    Nothing wrong with that attitude, if reality backs it up. And luckily, with Linux, reality is right there to prove the developers correct.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:What are they testing? by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I turn on my computer and don't touch it for a year, it will have excellent uptime, but it doesn't really test very much. Same too, if I just start up Apache and let it do its thing.

      So? The theoretical number of users that will be doing that sort of operation should be outnumbered by those that use it for "normal, day to day operations".

      In the end it would even itself out.

      If they make the kernel option totally opt-in, which is the right way to go, most people won't use it and only power-users will enable the function which will end up with the results you mentioned (or will it?)

      An interesting debate but at least they are willing to 100% respect the rights of their users.

  2. Nice troll, but... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft DOES test its products. I recall Win95 having "the largest beta-testing stage in history".

    Anyway, the security failures in WinXP are not due to lack of testing, but because of poor design decisions. Besides, security failures can't be detected by common beta-testing, but by heavy security audits (Not that I don't hate MS policies, I do, but there was no point in your comment).

    In summary, your post wasn't informative, interesting, or insightful. Not even funny.

  3. I think it's a good idea... by Biomechanical · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I don't think it could be thought of as spyware.

    Spyware is supposed to be unknowingly reporting information about you, whether it was mistakenly installed by you or it crept in from somewhere else.

    An application, or kernel option you flick on like a switch, which you install, and that reports information you know about, to people you understand are going to use that information, can't be called spyware unless it also happened to report how much pr0n you have as well as the kernel's amount of usage.

    I think it would be a neat option to have in the kernel in general. Off by default, all us geeks who want to say "look! here! I'm running Linux!" could turn it on and it could report our uptimes and what kernels we're running.

    We could "stand up and be counted" to show our support for Linux and give the various distributions a rough idea of what we think about them.

    --
    His name is Robert Paulsen...
    1. Re:I think it's a good idea... by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And I don't think it could be thought of as spyware.

      Spyware is supposed to be unknowingly reporting information about you, whether it was mistakenly installed by you or it crept in from somewhere else.


      The typical Linux user won't think it's spyware, no, but those working to move Linux towards a larger market want to be certain that newer users don't ever confuse the two.

      Unfortunately, this *could* be confused with Spyware -- especially after a cute little Microsoft funded "research" item gets posted to ZDnet or news.com.com.

      Linux Kernel Includes Spyware Reporting Your Usage Habits!

      And don't think for one second that any backpedaling by the kernel gurus could outsmart the Microsoft FUD team.

  4. vixie cron doesn't like the way it installs... by sednet · · Score: 3, Informative

    if you download and install it as of 10am PST today, its going to try and install a cron job that begins:
    -*/10 * * * * ps x | grep...
    which vixie cron (and presumably others) rejects as invalid. i just changed it to run every 10 minutes like:
    */10 * * * * ps x | grep...
    hth

    --
    about sean dreilinger
  5. Twisted by rongage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, I don't know what universe these folk are living in, but this "python-twisted" package or whatever it is called is absolutely NOT included in every Linux distribution.

    Slackware - oldest living Linux distribution - does NOT have this twisted thing in it.

    You would think that the developers would use a standard programming language - like C - for something like this...(gr&d)

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI