Company to Settle and Mine Mars

Rutgersen writes "Wired is reporting that a new startup is planning to colonize and mine Mars by 2025. From the article: 'The new company, 4Frontiers, plans to mine Mars for building materials and energy sources, and export the planet's mineral wealth to forthcoming space stations on the moon and elsewhere.'"

Comments

Re:Optimistic numbers

[Grishnakh]

However, if one must believe in the baby jesus and all that stuff, why is it so unreasonable to believe "there was some intelligent being that created the universe... and the method he used to initiate it could have been the big bang and evolution" and so on? Is that not also creationism?

Right, but the problem with this line of thinking is that it's rational and not dogmatic. It doesn't deny the existence of a supreme being, and puts forth a hypothesis which attempts to reconcile the existence of a deity with current scientific theories.

This goes against religion, because it disagrees with what is written in a certain holy book. Religion isn't about being rational and using your brain (which god gave you), but about being irrational and dogmatic, and refusing to accept any new evidence which contradicts what your particular religious sect tells you.

Genesis and the Big Bang

[benhocking]

Getting further off-topic - if that was possible :) - Genesis and the Big Bang is a good read (even if it's science is a little out of date). It explains how one can read the Torah literally and not eliminate the Big Bang. I believe (it's been a long time since I read this book) that he also explains how it can allow for evolution. This book is written from a Jewish point of view, but that shouldn't matter.

I can't remember if I read this in the same book or somewhere else, but the real danger for Christians (et al.) is the practice of making God the "God of the gaps". I.e., squeezing Him into ever smaller holes so that there is nothing left for him to do. I have no idea what the answer to this is for the religious, but it does seem like a legitimate problem. Another problem I've heard of is tying God to close to a particular scientific world-view. For example, if religious leaders go to great lengths explaining how the religious texts predict exactly this new scientific discovery, then if scientists say "whoops" and change their minds on scientific beliefs (as happened rather drastically from Hoyle to Hubble), it makes the religious leaders lose that much more credibility.