Slashdot Mirror


FEMA Demands Use of IE To File Online Katrina Claims

WebHostingGuy writes "As reported by MSNBC, if you survived the hurricane and are a Mac, Linux or Firefox user you cannot file a claim online. Further, you must have javascript enabled or face rejection. From the site: 'We are sorry for not being able to proceed your requests because you have failed our tests.' Opera and Netscape don't work either." Also reported at InformationWeek. From that story: "To file a claim online at FEMA's Individual Assistance Center, where citizens can apply for government help, the browser must be IE 6.0 or later with JavaScript enabled. That cuts out everyone running Linux or the Mac operating systems, as well as Windows users running alternate browsers such as Firefox or Opera. When TechWeb tested the site using Windows XP and Firefox 1.0.6, the message 'In order to use this site, you must have JavaScript Enabled and Internet Explorer version 6. Download it from Microsoft or call 1-800-621-FEMA (3362) to register' popped up on the screen." Update: 09/08 13:48 GMT by Z : Added word 'Online' to title to clarify story.

23 of 1,165 comments (clear)

  1. you know... by Shads · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... i'd just love to know what feature they're requiring that everyone else DOESN'T have... I wonder if opera using it's browser masking could do it?

    --
    Shadus
    1. Re:you know... by ramunas · · Score: 5, Interesting

      the best part is that using IE7 gets you the same errorpage. Those guys just know everything about browsers, don't they...

      --
      ./R My blog
    2. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, i clicked on
      "Go to FEMA Online Registration/Individual Assistance Center" and disabled cookies, to see the page tries to load in an infinite loop.

      Using Firefox and when prompted about cookies, set to deny.

      "Loading..."
      Refreshes
      "Loading..."
      Refreshes

      The actual site is:
      https://disasteraid.fema.gov/

      Maybe they have been /.ed?

    3. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bush controls this aspect of the FEMA website? Now that's something I didn't know...

      <sarcasm> Yes, he controls the FEMA website. He is also responsible for the school crossing guard not showing up to get my kids across the road. We can place all blame on the president. </sarcasm>

      I realize that all levels of government have some degree of responsibility, but the people much closer to the situation really needed to be more prepared before Katrina hit.

    4. Re:you know... by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well he did appoint the man in charge, someone who had been on the board of International Arabian Horse Association. He seems to have left there under a cloud about contributions to their legal defense fund and immediately got a job as FEMA director. I think he is highly qualified in disaster planning, unfortunately not disaster releif planning.

      http://www.denverpost.com/katrina/ci_2999761

      I think Bush can take some heat for this kind of miss-use of the public trust. These are not choice political plums to be given to big contributers or supporters but to qualified hard working capable individuals with credentials for the job. Especially when the lives of our mother and fathers and sons and brothers and daughters and uncles and neices are involved.

      The buck needs to stop where the fundemental problems stem from, not only where the problems show up.

    5. Re:you know... by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly. I started my current job a little over a year ago, maintaining and developing a public website for a multimillion-pound company.

      The MD is a raving MS fanboy, and shortly after arriving I was informed in no small measure that I was developing for IE, and "if the site doesn't work in any of those other browsers, who cares".

      (One of the funny things is, we actually produce Mac versions of some of our products, but the MD apparently doesn't care that most of those users wouldn't be able to see our site (or assumes they'll download IE/Mac, because it's Microsoft, so it must always be the best option).)

      Happily (and because my boss(es) don't know any better), I've coded everything to standards and used a few quick CSS/markup hacks to get everything still looking nice in IE.

      Since I started we've had three "it'll never happen" situations with (potentially extremely profitable) users using different browsers or OSes, and happily the site's worked perfectly for them.

      We've also had one "it'll never happen" situation where I did actually give in and do it the way the Board specified (dynamic content served by ASP.NET instead of Perl, on a server too old to support ASP.NET reliably). Because our (cheap, crappy) hosting contract is on a Linux machine, we have to host all ASP.NET content on another (in-house) server, and seamlessly (heh, make that "as seamlessly as we can") transfer users between the main part of the site (static HTML on Apache/Linux) and the dynamic pages (ASP.NET/Windows Server).

      Predictably enough the tiny pipe into the inhouse servers went down, and we ended up with a convoluted sequence of events that lead to us needing to host an ASP.NET page on the (external) Linux server. Due to the crappiness of the hosting contract they were unable to offer (or the MD was unwilling to pay) for the service, so the site had huge sections missing for several days, mostly important advertising campaign landing-pages which provide the majority of marketing leads for the company.

      Had I been allowed to develop the content in the language I specified (Perl/PHP, simply for the portability), this would never have happened - we could have transferred the dynamic pages to the Linux server at no extra cost (in fact they would probably have already been there), and the site would have carried on as normal.

      The morals of the story are this:

      Never disobey your boss on technical matters, even when he has no fucking clue what he's babbling about. That's how you get fired.

      If you can possibly obey the letter of his instructions (but disobey the spirit) and do it the right way, go for it - just cover your arse and don't spend an unreasonable amount of extra time.

      People who know nothing about technical matters should let their fucking techies make technical decisions. You pay them for a reason, and if anyone could do their job why not fire them and hire a schoolkid for a fraction of the money?

      "It'll never happen" scenarios pop up 100% of the time, given enough time. Your techies know this, and will sensibly plan for it. With sufficiently good techies (and budget) you never suffer the consequences of a bad technical decision, so you don't and won't.

      In other words, get good techies, then get the fuck out of the way and let them do their job.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    6. Re:you know... by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying had Bush and FEMA got their acts together not one person would have died, or the hurricane would have missed NO. Whatever happens there would have been destruction, and people would likely have died.

      However, when you've got the worst disaster in US history going, the army (and even National Guard!) are undermanned and bled dry from a protracted, possibly unwinnable (and certainly unpopular and ethically dubious) war, disaster-recovery funds will be harder to find because the economy's been run into the ground, the head of the federal agency responsible for dealing with exactly these kinds of disasters is a completely unqualified guy who only got the job because he's friends with the President, the president refuses all foreign aid for the disaster and delays any definite action for several days while he has a few rounds of golf on his ranch and sits and plays guitar, well... don't tell me that lives couldn't have been saved if he'd got off his arse, cut his vacation short and done something sooner.

      I'm not even from the USA (I'm in the UK), and I've been outraged by Bush sitting on his thumbs for days, while people in NO too poor to leave die from lack of water, or from drinking water contaminated with toxic waste or raw sewage.

      He was all over 9/11 when there was a clear enemy and political capital to be made from it. When it's merely a case of knuckling down and solving a problem, his true colours emerge - he's either dangerously incompetent or really doesn't give a fuck.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    7. Re:you know... by venril · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.

      Sounds like:

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -Arthur C. Clarke

  2. Re:Virtual PC by cached · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From TFA: If you're running Mac OS X, you could run Virtual PC 7 and then access Windows and Internet Explorer.

    --
    +1 funny, -2 overrated. Life isn't fair.
  3. Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The title pretty much sums it up. This is such a none issue that I cannot believe that it is on the front page.

    Look at the destruction in New Orleans and Biloxi. Do you really think that there are any/many people filing FEMA claims via the internet?

  4. ADA? by fossa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't the disabilities act apply to FEMA? And doesn't that require a certain level of website?

    1. Re:ADA? by scottennis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the FEMA website:

      "The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is committed to providing access to our web pages for individuals with disabilities, both members of the public and Federal employees.

      To meet this commitment, we will comply with the requirements of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. Section 508 requires that individuals with disabilities, who are members of the public seeking information or services from us, have access to and use of information and data that is comparable to that provided to the public who are not individuals with disabilities, unless an undue burden would be imposed on us. Section 508 also requires us to ensure that Federal employees with disabilities have access to and use of information and data that is comparable to the access to and use of information and data by Federal employees who are not individuals with disabilities, unless an undue burden would be imposed on us.

      If you use assistive technology (such as a Braille reader, a screen reader, TTY, etc.) and the format of any material on our web sites interfere with your ability to access the information, please contact FEMAOPA@dhs.gov for assistance. To enable us to respond in a manner most helpful to you, please indicate the nature of your accessibility problem, the preferred format in which to receive the material, the web address of the requested material, and your contact information."

    2. Re:ADA? by FreeUser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fact is, the same people pointing out that Bush was on vacation during the hurricane and he was too slow to dish out support while people were dieing are the same people who said he was too quick to dish out support when last years hurricanes hit Florida.

      No, they are the same people that point out how Bush favors his brother's state over everyone else. Which is a problem for any citizen or taxpayer living outside of Florida.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  5. Sorry but the subject of this article is misleadin by unborracho · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not that they can't file claims without using IE... they just can't do it online. If you've ever tried programming javascript for client side error checking of complex forms, you know that standards are very non-existant in the internet world. I completely understand why they would only want people using IE to register, especially if they didn't have much of a tech support staff. It's near impossible to cater a web app to every single flavor of every browser for every OS.

    --
    "You had this look that of an angel, it was such a bad disguise" --Dishwalla
  6. Just Another Asinine Hurdle by Lord+Grey · · Score: 1, Interesting
    This is just one more hurdle in the maze of idiocy that FEMA has managed to erect. The tales surrounding this agency's handling of Katrina have taken on an almost surrealistic quality: So much stupidity, too little compassion, and an obsessiveness for correct paperwork that border on the insane.

    I live in the United States and pretty much like it here. But this kind of stupid shit, coupled with all the freedom we've given up for the sake of "greater security," makes me want to bitch-slap the entire Federal government.

    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
  7. No, no, no by Monoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is exactly why I posted to Ask Slashdot (rejected) to ask what everyone thought about putting together some type of generic system for disaster victims.

    Disasters may be the worst time for requiring proprietary systems.

    There has been some discussion on isc.sans.org about the Red Cross needing IT volunteers to develop their system.

    My idea is that most of us have extra stuff laying around that could easily be used with a customized Knoppix type CD (no HD keeps the cost down and the system intact up). The systems could be used to get shelters online (some corp can provide the circuit for Internet access). On the backend there could be a DB for victims.

    Also, a lot of these people have lost EVERYTHING. A barebones computer that gets them online is better than no computer at all.

    And what better way to introduce more people the world without MS.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  8. And the catch is... by Criterion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You gotta love their disclaimer...

    "unless an undue burden would be imposed on us"

    Who, exactly, decides what is an "undue burden" and what is their criteria for deeming it so?

    --
    We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  9. Re:STOP WHINING! by jp10558 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is going to be redundant, but the issue is this: People have lost their possessions. So likely don't have computers.

    The phone service will only mail you forms to your home address, either being useless as they don't have mail service or an address to deliver to, or delaying their movement through the system for no reason.

    The alternative is the web based form, however, in the shelters the only computers available are donated ones. Many of these do not have WindowsXP installed, and even if they did, the disaster workers are using putting in a standard Knoppix boot to greatly simplify administration and such. Not to mention avoid license issues.

    So they cannot access the forms this way either, again needlessly delaying their progress. This is forcing many people to wait until the disaster is over, and FEMA gets around to placing kiosks where people can go to sign up.

    Not only is this inefficient for FEMA, but it's stupid to make people in a shelter with a computer and internet access unable to fill out the forms NOW.

    By requireing IE6 - FEMA is saying that people need to donate new computers or ones with paid up licenses (and how does one do that anyway? Lots of red tape) vs giving any functional hardware from the last 12 years or so and a non legally encumbered CD the aid workers can pop-in.

    --
    Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  10. I'll buy that... for a millionth of a cent by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Sounds like a weak excuse to me. The fact is that submitting forms and that sort of thing don't require an "application" at all. They require HTML and a bit of server-side technology that has only been active and stable for, say, 15 years now.

    or maybe 25. I'm just a kid so I don't know.

    Can I ask a follow-up question? When, if ever, did it first occur to FEMA that people registering/applying via the Web might be a Good Thing? This week?

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  11. Not uncommon. by UncleRage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live and run a PC Repair/Gaming shop in western New York (Chautauqua County, to be more specific). This area's main industry is grapes (as consumable food stuff, i.e. Welch's juice, jellies, etc...), ergo, there are a lot of farmer's here.

    As of last year, most of the buyers began requiring the farmers to file their spray reports (records of fertilizers and pesticides) electronically. The means of filing differed between two major buyers -- one is via the web, the other via a spreadsheet and emailed. The web version - IE only (no mac's, no *nix, no alternative browsers). The other, an Excel spreadsheet that does not like opening in OOo.

    (In all honesty, that has opened up a nice side service for my business...)

    My point is not to detract from the tragedy that has befallen the victims of Katrina, only to point out that it is not uncommon for decision makers (who's very decisions effect a group's livelihood) to make unwise decisions.

    I would be interested to see if there's an increase in sales of x86 laptops on ebay (or any used market) specifically for Mac users who need to file with FEMA. (Just as interesting would be to see if there's an increase in sales of Crossover Office).

    <sarcasm> Maybe's there's grant money there for a study.</sarcasm>.

    --
    #SickNotWeak
  12. Re:I wonder by Ricochet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The reason is that some people are building web access kiosks and they're using Linux. The reason for the kiosks are so people can communicate with others. While I agree it's not the first thing on the list of that which is important, communication is important and these kiosks may be the first thing available to many. Also by using the kiosk they may be able to start the FEMA paper work early and get something that can help them soon.

  13. Re:American citizens must use windows... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "[...] if you want to go to McDonalds drive-thru you need to have a car."

    I'm not sure if this is off-topic or not, but it reminded me of something that happened once.

    Back in 1985, as Hurricane Gloria was bearing down on Long Island, I decided it might not be a bad idea to head to the bank, get some cash, and lay in supplies for the day. I was tasked with keeping an eye on our network hubs which were located in a potentially leaky basement.

    In any event, I figured I'd make an early start of it. So I wandered down to the bank. This was before ATMs were particularly widespread, but the drive-thru tellers were in at 7:30. I figured I'd just walk up to the drive-thru teller, since I didn't have a car.

    No dice. I was refused service. Even when the cars had left, the teller refused to even go over to walk-up window. I would have to wait until the bank opened at 9:00AM.

    So I did. I waited until 9:00AM, got my money, made a bee-line to the store for food, etc. and got into work just as the storm started to hit in earnest.

    That weekend, I went into the bank, closed my account, and let them know exactly how I felt about being discriminated against.

    Part of my annoyance, of course, came from the fact that we have a hurricane bearing down on us and I have to stand around and wait while others are allowed to go, simply because the bank had some rule. Actually, the person at the bank I talked to agreed with me and the teller was reprimanded.

  14. Used Mozilla/Linux and set Browser to LIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Curious, I went to the link using Mozilla and Linux. Sure enough, it popped up a display saying I needed IE.

    Then using mozdev prefbar, I set the very same Mozilla browser running linux to pretend to be IE6.

    BINGO! The page came up with the form and check boxes.

    I stopped here because I'm not actually applying for aid.

    There doesn't appear to be a valid reason for even looking for IE.