Slashdot Mirror
Controlling Hurricanes?
Phil Shapiro writes "With the cost of hurricane Katrina running as high as $100 billion, the thought of trying to control the severity of hurricanes should be mulled. Dissipating the energy of hurricanes as they're forming might be within the range of the feasible.
Scientific American tackles this topic in an article last year, as does this crank. (I admit the crank is me.) Is this type of thing feasible, or is it best not even tried at all?"
Jeez. This was on the news what 3 day ago? Anyway.. I don't know if this is an up and coming theonion.com but here it is - a pretty twisted article about how the Yakuza & the KGB are behind it. I give the article 4 stars just based on the WTF factor alone.
I just want to know how this would affect the "Hurricane Rains" those of us in the MidWest recieve from hurricanes that form in the Gulf.
Without those hurricanes, how will we get those rains?
If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
Suppose we were able to steer a hurricane in a limited way using any of these water temperature techniques.
Suppose also that there is a hurricane headed for a major city - say, Miami or New Orleans. And we employ this steering mechanism.
The result is now that some agency decided that a smaller community - say, Mobile AL or Pensacola - bears the brunt of a hurricane instead of the larger city.
Wouldn't the residents of the affected area have some serious legal recourse against whomever "steered" the storm toward them? Is this steering ethical, given that we're essentially choosing one group of people to sustain hardship and death over another?
What about military use of this technology? Instant economic catastrophe for regimes you happen not to care for, whether you're in a shooting war or not. Or even political - making sure a red state gets the storm rather than a blue state. Given the current polarity of American politics, I could certainly see such a decision being made in a smoky backroom somewhere - buried so deep it'll never see the light of day.
Until these storms can be eradicated completely - the ethical and moral questions related to affecting a storm's path and the potential for misuse of that technology would seem to outweigh its usefulness.
The full article suggests that the first testbed for the technology would be enhancing rainfall. It is to be assumed that this would mean enhancing rainfall in areas that don't get enough of it -- the American midwest, drought-stricken areas of Africa, etc. Realistically, that would probably help more people overall than hurricane prevention, although hurricane prevention would probably win as far as preventing property damage goes. It's hard to argue with the idea of keeping the world's breadbaskets well hydrated, am I right?
Our government can't possibly control the weather!
It's seriously time to wake up, people!
Real programmers can write assembly code in any language. -- Larry Wall
Senate Bill S. 517, introduced by Senator Kay Hutchinson (R-TX), on March 3, 2005 is pretty interesting:
S. 517: A Bill to Establish a Weather Modifications Operations and Research Board, and for other purposes.
Huh? Can this be for real? You bet: Clicky.
Also interesting, this is supposed to take effect on October 1, 2005! It has only been introduced, so this is unlikely at this point. But still the timing is creepy.
Thanks to Richard C Hoagland's Enterprise Mission web site for the information. Richard is way out there sometimes, but he definately has great credentials.
-- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
This article made me think of an oft neglected factoid between the United States and Russia. Oddly enough in the official Anti-Ballistic-Missile-Treaty there is a clause that states that America is not allowed to use / deploy their weather changing weapons including HAARP against the old Soviet Union.
There is also a UN treaty circa 1976 that basically says the same thing but in more general terms, while again naming the US and Russia.
Now I hate to be 'that guy' but knowing that in all the: legalese, time, preperation, and double checking that went into the ABM treaty that the inclusion of a weather weapon cant be purely speculative or coincidental.
Ok, im taking off the tinfoil hat now (but it does make me wonder sometimes why Bush is so sure that global wearming isnt due to greenhouse gas emission.....)
---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
Hurricanes are ephemeral, they must have near perfect conditions to even form, and must have perfect conditions to grow to be powerfull. Even a fraction of a percent of the storms energy, applied in the correct manner, could disipate or weaken the storm significantly. Something as simple as changing the reflectivity of the oceans surface over a hundred square mile area in front of a storm might be enough. Should we just throw up our hands and give up, or should we look for a way to stop some human suffering and large scale economic loss?
There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.