Slashdot Mirror


A New Replacement for TV Tome

Randall311 writes to tell us about, what the creators hope will be, a new replacement for the old TV Tome website, the TV IV Wiki. The once popular TV Tome website was absorbed by CNET in April of this year and most of the content was added to their TV.com website. Many users dislike the new format with vast amounts of flash, obnoxious ads, and missing content. So, if you liked the old TV Tome website perhaps this will allow the community to rebuild what it has lost.

5 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Mirroring TV.com? by rteunissen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What would be the legal status of mirroring most of the tv.com content to the new wiki? Considering that the content on tvtome.com was submitted by people from all over the world, could a former tvtome editor place his own text (now part of tv.com) on the wiki? Or can we just outright copy everything over and get a major headstart, the info on tv.com comes (mostly) from tv network's websites/public communication.

  2. Something Awful project by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 5, Informative

    The TV IV stems from a forum on Something Awful so with all that goon power behind it I'm sure it will snowball shortly in to a quite concise database.

    The cookery forum offshoot, GBS Food is doing wonderfully since it's conception!

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
  3. Re:Poor resource by /ASCII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TV Tome didn't always have thousands of programs, hopefully tviv will start catching up quickly. This is a bit like what happened with CDDB and FreeDB. Sure CDDB was a much better source for a while, but FreeDB quickly caught on and is new a perfectly viable source of CD information.

    And since both sites are free, your comment about getting what you pay for makes no sense whatsoever.

    --
    Try out fish, the friendly interactive shell.
  4. Re:Possible Problems with Wiki Medium? by amodm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IMHO in the long term, the positives of the wiki approach far outweigh the negatives.

    Look at wikipedia: some or the other time a page is spoiled, but its recovered very quickly and I believe its one of the most reliably informative sites on the net.

    The warning is there, because of the _potential_ of spoilers.

    One of the mechanisms in place is that no anonymous editing is allowed. People need to register to edit. That way, a spolier's account can be locked. For every spolier, a person would need to create an account. Its tedious in the least.

  5. epguides.com by Morinaka · · Score: 5, Informative

    If your just looking for episode listings and the episode names, http://www.epguides.com/ is pretty good. No flash ads or anything. It also links straight to the TV.com page when you click on the episode link. So that option is still available.

    --
    Rock is Dead! Long live Paper and Scissors!!