12Mbps Powerline Broadband Trial Unveiled
An anonymous reader writes "The tiny state of Tasmania in Australia has kicked off the country's first commercial powerline broadband trial. The service is capable of providing Internet connectivity of up to 12Mbps but during trials, it will be limited to 4Mbps. Costs will range from $12 (A$15) to $67 (A$80) per month for speeds between 256Kbps and 4Mbps. Powerline broadband has received wide support from leading vendors including Intel, Motorola and Cisco Systems -- all of whom support an organisation called the HomePlug Powerline Alliance."
...that our once thought unfounded fears of someone programming our toaster to eat our dog are not not-so-radical?
http://www.tastel.com.au/bpl/price_broadband.html
I bet I can do that in a day or two just patching a game? Or am I reading it wrong?
* Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
Broadband over powerlines makes a whole lot of sense. Currently if you want broadband you have to run cable from your local cable provider, phone line from your local phone company, optical fiber from . . . whoever might offer that service (not an option in most areas, including my own, so I'm not sure), or you'll have to set up a satellite dish and worry about weather effects.
But what's the one thing that all computers have in common? They use electricity! And even if you're generating your own, you're still likely hooked up to the grid so that you can sell your excess back.
I can definitely see broadband over power lines being a big hit in developing countries, since they won't have to worry about the added infrastructure for connecting their residents to the Internet. Add voice over IP and you end up with VOIPOPL: Three products for the price of one (give or take a bit of added overhead).
This was a big PR chance. I heard in some areas the ONLY way to get messages passed (especially "Is my brother OK" type Health & Welfare traffic) was by hams.
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
The article alludes several times to the higher possible speeds:
According to Ehrenfeld, the BPL service will be capable of providing an Internet connection for homes and businesses that is "vastly quicker" than the 24Mbps maximum possible with ADSL2+ technology, which uses analogue telephone lines. Such speeds are so far only being offered by only a couple of ISPs, with several more offering speeds up to 12Mbps.
But what really caught my eye:
"engin and Mitsubishi Electric engineers have worked closely together in both Australia and Japan to incorporate engin's VoIP technology in the 200Mbps BPL product developed by Mitsubishi," said a statement from the VoIP vendor on the trial.
Will this deployment of Broadband over Powerline cause interference to radio services and be subject to interference from radio services ?
: 2099729486:pc=PC_2845
The American Radio Relay league has information on BPL in the USA at
http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/
The Australian Government has information on BPL at
http://www.acma.gov.au/ACMAINTER.2490560:STANDARD
Peter AI6PG
A couple of years ago I did some work for these guys. Their products were great, but ISTR that only about 6 homeplug devices could be used on a given circuit. OK, things will have moved on a bit in that time, but I wonder what the limit is now. Also, they would not work across a transformer. Correct me if I'm wrong, but where I live every neighbourhood has a step-down transformer to convert the high voltages used to transport electricity over the grid to something that won't fry any poor bugger that gets within a few feet of it.
Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
How many people share a powerline? More than share my cable loop? How much capacity per subscriber?
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
It should also be noted that currently Ham Radio has currently shown itself to be the only reliable form of communications in New Orleans. People who say that Ham Radio is dead need to understand that it is not dead, it's currently evolving and still provides an essential service from providing early warning on severe weather incidents (skywarn) to disaster recovery to simply talking to interesting people. Cell phones simply do not provide adequate coverage and reliablity during emergency situations.
It currently is also evolving within the digital realm to provide everything from high speed data over the air (HSMM working group in the ARRL) to VoIP interconnects between repeaters over the Internet.
Hopefully something can be reached that provides for a BPL system that does not cause interferenece with Ham Radio (this system might... didn't read the spec). If it does, I would rather have Ham Radio over BPL simply because it really doesn't bring very much to the table.