Slashdot Mirror


Behind The Development Of The iPod nano

bonch writes "A Time Magazine article on the behind-the-scenes development of the iPod nano reveals that development work began just nine months ago, when the iPod mini was still a top-seller. Every internal component was redesigned and packed into every millimeter of the space inside. Famed Apple designer Jonathan Ives spent months on the tiniest of details, like the laser-etching of the logo and the roughness of the clickwheel compared to the smoothness of the rest of the exterior. 'I know you're not going to consciously find these details particularly appealing," says Ives, 'but I think it's the fact that we've worried about all of them that makes the product so precious.'"

5 of 502 comments (clear)

  1. It's IVE, not IVES by aixou · · Score: 4, Informative

    The name is Jonathan Ive, without an "s". Sheesh. It's even spelled correctly in the article. ::sigh::

  2. Just so you know... by wtmcgee · · Score: 4, Informative

    it's Jonathan Ive, not Ives.

    --
    *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
  3. Too expensive? by nra1871 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I really don't get why everyone is saying the nano is too pricey. A 4GB flashdrive goes for $250-300 on Froogle (I'm sure there's some geekier place to check, but whatever). So basically with the nano you pay for the flash memory, and get the music part free. I also see a lot of complaining that the nano is worse than the mini because it doesn't have the same GB/$ ratio. I know it's unnerdy and wrong, but I would rather have the nano, which I can wear on a lanyard, and the durability of the flash over the hard drive. I'm seriously thinking of selling my 3G 20GB and picking one of these up.

  4. Re:Engineers @ work by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Informative
    What's BFH again?

    BFH has the specific meaning of Big F***ing Hammer among engineers. Always has, always will. An engineer without his BFH is as lost as a chemist without his CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics.

    "What? No CRC Handbook? Must be an E-winger."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. Re:Ipods and linux by i_should_be_working · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm in the same boat as you. After the nano came out I'm considering one for the first time ever. So I borrowed my flatmate's to see how well it does with Linux/Gnome/Rhythmbox.

    Flawlessly.

    As soon as I plugged it in, an ipod shaped icon showed up on the desktop through which I could browse the thing. You can see everything on the ipod just through browing with Nautilus, or whatever your file browser is, but the songs are in some non-sensical folder structure. It's easier to use Rhythmbox. So I Open up Rhythmbox and click on the Ipod icon that had just showed up in the sources list and was able to browse the songs. Copied some songs from the Ipod to my computer by just dragging the song from Rhythmbox to my desktop, which I believe you can't do in itunes.

    This was with Gnome 2.12, Rhythmbox 0.9, Ubuntu Breezy.