Slashdot Mirror


Dutch to Open Electronic Files on Children

Del writes "The Dutch government plans to open an electronic file on every child at birth as a tool to spot and protect the troubled kids of the future. All citizens will be tracked from cradle to grave in a single database - including health, education, family and police records."

6 of 532 comments (clear)

  1. What's going on by jeroenb · · Score: 5, Informative

    What is really going on is that the already existing files of different agencies are being coupled in an attempt to keep children in difficult situations from falling off the radar when for instance they move to a different city. Child protection services often didn't know about children moving into the city with problems in their past - in the old database the record would be closed and they wouldn't turn up in the new one until something actually happened (which is usually too late).

    So I hope this is not interpreted as a terrible invasion of privacy - all the information is already collected by local governments. The only change is that moving from one local government's area to another doesn't mean those services lose all information.

  2. Curse or Blessing? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Informative

    The blurb (and TFA) are a bit misleading. They suggest that Dutch citizens will now be tracked ``from cradle to grave'', whereas they hadn't been before.

    In reality, what's happening is that schools, police, and various organizations for the protection of children, psychiatric institutions, etc. are already doing this tracking.

    What's changing is that they will now exchange information about which kids have caused or otherwise been in trouble.

    The rationale is that by improving communication between these institutions, kids can be more adequately helped. For example, a school can receive information from a child protection institution that says the child is having trouble at home, and link that to the fact that the child is often missing from school.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  3. Additional background information by Frans+Faase · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the past year, several times children have died because of molest, when several authorities where aware of things going wrong. In some cases ten or more different organisations where involved with a family but not knowing about each other. After the child died, it was realized that the life of the child could have been saved, if the organisations had been aware of eachother.

  4. Re:gestapo wtf by igb · · Score: 5, Informative
    You would expect the Dutch to be slightly more attuned to this. The roundups in 1942 were massively aided by the Dutch census of 1937, which included religious affiliation. And massive collaboration by the police and civil service, of course, but few European countries reacted to roundups of Jews with anything other than enthusiasm. It's instructive to note how few Dutch Jews survived the war with how many Danish Jews did. In Denmark, there wasn't a population register with religion on it, and the civil service behaved impeccably.

    ian

  5. Re:I wish this was a joke by molotov02 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although I quite agree that this might have some huge possibilities for abuse, it helps save children.
    Here in the Netherlands, every year there are a few high profile cases where children are extremely abused and/or killed. Usually, afterwards it became know that quite a lot of social services were involved into the family, but didn't communicate with each other or that records simply 'vanished' because the family moved. in result; children die because social services are hugely incompetent.
    This system now automates the 'speaking to each other' part of the whole equation.
    FYI; in the province of Utrecht, this system has already been tested for a few months, with excellent results.
    I do completely agree this could be seen as a dangerous law, so far it actually does what it's meant to do; protect abused children.
    (To tell the truth; we're surprised the government actually does something like this right)

  6. Re:Yeh but by Scarblac · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's not true. We spend less money fighting drugs and have a smaller drugs problem than the rest of Europe. There are some cities that have put limits on the number of 'coffee shops' they wanted in town center, and perhaps a few had to close, but then normal bars and all other businesses are regulated too.

    What's popularly regarded as failed is integration of minorites (i.e., muslim immigrants) into our society. There's a big divide there, mutual fear and anger, and the feeling that the values of Dutch society aren't shared by traditional Islam. That's what the big mess in our society right now is. Not a few harmless coffee shops.

    --
    I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.