Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

P2P Now and Then

Posted by Zonk on from the distributing-stuff-in-little-pieces dept.

brajesh writes "There was an earlier story on Slashdot regarding eDonkey overtaking BitTorrent in P2P traffic. The BBC story was based on this press release by CacheLogic. To expand on this, there is a comprehensive analysis of P2P trends in 2005 by the same firm. The report makes some insights into the present and future of P2P, particularly interesting in the light of recent steps taken by BBC -BBC iMP and others. The analysis also makes some observations about the break-up of P2P content."

3 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. To summarize: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    - There is a lot of P2P traffic.
    - This will not decrease.
    - P2P packages will come and go.
    - Industry had better embrace this.

  2. method? by adminispheroid · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The first question that leaps to mind, which none of the posted info answers, is how the heck do you compare gnutella to bittorrent? I mean, the gnutella network is used only for indexing, and the transfers are done by http, whereas bittorrent is for transfers (and there is no indexing). Did they take this into account? If so, how? Not clear to me how you'd figure out which http traffic was gnutella-related.

    I don't know squat about eDonkey and Fasttrack, so I don't know how these considerations apply to them.

  3. Re:a new conduit by Raindance · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe. There's nothing inherently egalitarian about the internet.

    Lessig's "Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace" touches on this. Code is law-- how the 'net is structured determines how it's used, with the nigh force of law.

    The internet is fairly favorable to the "little guy" right now, but Lessig says there's nothing inherently unchangeable about the internet's Code. The battle for the internet *has not been won*.