Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba to Demo New Fuel Cell MP3 Players

virgil_disgr4ce tells us The Register is reporting that Toshiba recently unveiled a fuel cell based mp3 player. The pump-less fuel cell technology was first discussed about a year ago but Toshiba said not to expect the fuel cell players to hit the market any time soon. Toshiba, however, does hope that the players running off the fuel cell prototypes, and their methanol cartridges, will get their public debut at CEATEC JAPAN 2005.

42 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. Great but... by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 5, Funny

    when will I be able to buy a cat powered mp3 player?

    1. Re:Great but... by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 2, Funny

      Meh, either will suffice. :P

    2. Re:Great but... by Bogtha · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  2. Why bother? by republican+gourd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are they wasting their time on mp3 players? An mp3 player that can run for 35 hours (per the article) is not much more useful than an mp3 player that can run for 12 hours... but a laptop that could run for 12 hours instead of 4 hours (assuming a 3:1 payoff when compared to traditional batteries) would be incredibly useful.

    1. Re:Why bother? by Rob_Ogilvie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How could a fuel cell really replace a traditional battery in a laptop? If I go on vacation with my laptop, will I need to take my gallon of ethanol with me instead of a tiny power brick?

      I could see fuel cells augmenting traditional laptop batteries, but to replace them entirely we'd need to make recharging a bit more feasible.

      --
      Rob
    2. Re:Why bother? by Propagandhi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm guessing they run into weight issues. Their flash player prototype for instance, weighs 78.5g. Compare this to a standard flash player (Shuffle=22.112628 grams, Nano=42.5242847 grams).

      So if we stick with the linear relationship, you're increasing the weight of the gadget by 2-3 times, and that's probably not acceptable in the case of laptops...

    3. Re:Why bother? by cr_nucleus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why are they wasting their time on mp3 players?

      Easy, they're going for something simple and small to limit the potential sources of problems. When it works fine, they're ready to go for more challenging products.

      And one of the whole point of fuel cells is the time it take to recharge (actually refill). Even if it lasts just as long, being able to refill in seconds is a benefit. Problem is, you now need a reserve of whatever you fill it with :)

    4. Re:Why bother? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's some pretty ridiculous math. Firstly, you're comparing their flash player to one that's completely non-equivalent, seeing how the iPods are made by a different company, have different features etc. If you compared it to an equivalent player by Toshiba that was powered by LiIon batteries, you might have been off to a reasonable start.

      Then you're assuming that the weight of the device is going to grow by the same fraction... the batteries of most laptops form a much smaller fraction of the overall weight than do the batteries of small portable devices.

    5. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not an entirely fair analogy, the majority of the weight for an mp3 player (especially a flash based one) is the battery. A laptop however has many more components that contribute to its weight. For instance an inspiron 9300 laptop weighs 7.9 lbs, of that a mere .88 lbs of it is the battery. (According to an ebay seller selling inspiron 9300 replacement batteries). If your analysis of 2-3 times the battery weight per unit is correct that would put the laptop at anywhere from 8.78 lbs to 9.66 lbs. Many desktop replacement laptops weigh that much now, so it is not an unreasonable weight. Granted lighter is usually better, but I know an awful lot of people that would carry around the extra 1.5 lbs for a laptop that would last for 12-16 hours. Just my two cents.

    6. Re:Why bother? by Fussen · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about a Coleman laptop? Complete with sparker and Blu-Ray (not the pilot light)

    7. Re:Why bother? by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm assuming the fuel cell would be in conjunction with an AC adapter.

      Fuel cell can't replace batteries. Even in fuel cell powered cars, there's going to be a battery in there no matter what. The one thing fuel cells can't do that lithium, nicad, or nimh batteries can is that they can be recharged with a conventional AC outlet. Also, by supporting AC outlets, I can conserve battery power and even recharge it as I use it.

  3. help my ipod is leakig by jini · · Score: 2, Funny

    what to do with the water?

  4. Must be DoD Contractors Developing this.... by Rob_Ogilvie · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....to go from "will be released in 2005" to "will be released in 2007" between 2004 and now.

    --
    Rob
  5. Is it just me that I don't find this appealing? by X43B · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I am excited to see fuel cells advance, I don't see the draw for this type of application beyond the niche of people with too much money.

    As a poor college student, I avoid recurring costs as much as possible. Rechargeable batteries may suck in terms of energy density compared to this cartidge/fuel cell combination, but the cost of electricity is relatively cheap to the point of being free. Does anyone really want to run out and buy catridges constantly if they want to use their mp3 player every day?

    Beyond cost, the fact that outlets are much more convenient than running to the store (or carrying around a bunch of spare catridges, negating the smallness of your mp3 player) is big turnoff for me.

    1. Re:Is it just me that I don't find this appealing? by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the same thing every time that I read about some silly "fuel cell powered device" replacing existing rechargeable devices. I don't want to carry fuel cells with me, and I don't want to purchase them. I can always find a free or nearly free outlet to plug in to. All of these fuel cell researchers need to realize that if we a device doesn't already physically consume fuel, no one is likely to migrate to a device that does. How dumb can these incredibly smart people be!

    2. Re:Is it just me that I don't find this appealing? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>" ...but the cost of electricity is relatively cheap to the point of being free.

      >Take an intro Economics course, really, you need it.

      LOL! If someone needs an econ course it's you!

      A Duracell Ultra AA alkaline battery can be bought for about $1. It delivers 2.3 watt-hours. The power company charges something like 10 cents per kilowatt-hour. For $1 you get 10 kilowatt-hours from an outlet- as much as you get from 4300 Duracell Ultras. From an outlet, 2.3 watt hours costs about 1/50 of a cent. On the scale that we're talking about, that certainly is "cheap to the point of being free." We're not talking about recharging a Prius. Even considering recharge inefficiencies, you'll be lucky if you manage to use a penny's worth of electricity over the lifetime of an AA rechargeable battery. Just leaving the recharger's wall-wart plugged in wastes more electricity than the rechargeable gets.

      Per watt-hour, the energy costs associated with batteries- rechargeable or not- are several orders of magnitude greater than those of the cost of a comparable amount of electricity considered purely as a commodity. You're not really paying for the electricity with batteries so much as the portability and convenience. And with rechargeables, most of the cost of operation comes from degradation to the battery structure over repeated charge/discharge cycles. (Plus the environmental load from the cadmium when people don't recycle NiCads.) The cost of the recharge current itself is the most negligible factor as the GP correctly pointed out.

  6. 99.5% methanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Has anyone else here ever had exposure to 99.5% methanol? Nasty stuff. Toxic, and readily absorbed through the skin. I really can't imagine this being approved by any governmental agency. How about flying on an airplane with 150 or 200 methanol powered fuel cells? No thanks.

    1. Re:99.5% methanol by alienw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sheesh. It's not that toxic, unless you drink it. It's not "readily absorbed through the skin"; the MSDS for it says it is only a skin irritant, which is the case with any alcohol. It can be absorbed through the skin, or course, but only with prolonged contact. It does not seem to be significantly more dangerous than most household chemicals. Considering that it will be in a sealed cartridge, I don't see the big deal.

    2. Re:99.5% methanol by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Has anyone else here ever had exposure to 99.5% methanol? Nasty stuff. Toxic, and readily absorbed through the skin.
      This technology was originally developed to use ethanol but that was not considered politically acceptable because they didn't want people drinking the contents of their mobile phone - so we have the tamper proof methanol cartridge idea which has slowed adoption by a few years. It is being down this way purely to get approval from government agencies.
    3. Re:99.5% methanol by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm, how about flying with 50 tons of jet fuel? Not at all dangerous huh?

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    4. Re:99.5% methanol by shellbeach · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its vapor is also very dangerous.

      No it's not - I use 99.8% minimum purity Methanol all the time in the lab, and I can assure you it's pretty much harmless. No, you don't want to drink it and you don't want to shower in it. But that's about it ... Seriously, if you believed all that safety crap you wouldn't put salt on your food as it "may cause skin, eye or respiratory irritation."

      I think it'd be great to get these fuel cell players - I'd have permanent access to all the fuel I need :))

  7. Toshiba Announces Methanol Recall by Helpadingoatemybaby · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Toshiba Announces Recall Methanol Powered MP3 Players"

    In a surprise announcement today, Toshiba Japan announced that it was recalling it's Methanol Powered batteries from the market after users reported missing limbs, including fingers, hands, and chunks of leg.

    Toshiba spokesperson Udai appeared shocked, "We really thought mixing electricity and methanol was a good idea" he stated. Initial reports of these small explosions from the MP3 players appear to be caused by the music pop sensation Brittany Spears. Estimates to this point indicate that over 50% of her fan base has lost at least one finger up to the knuckle rendering the frustrated users incapable of using the mp3 player. Cries of "dammit" could be heard from Junior High Schools across the nation.

    --

    The baby's fine -- please stop sending business cards.

  8. Don't get too enthusiastic now... by Animaether · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How would you recharge this ? Methanol isn't too common a substance, partially because it is some nasty stuff. (Flamable, toxic, etc.)

    So instead of some form of battery acid leaking if you somehow manage to kill your battery, you get methanol leaking which easily absorbs through skin. Aye.

    That's ignoring how you would get whatever to refill it with anyway. Imagine having to buy a special methanol pack - which, of course, wouldn't be standard any more than current cellulars' batteries are standard. (Imagine the prices they could charge here - and they would have to, as transport to stores, putting it on shelves, etc. is much more costly than...) . But you don't have to buy a new battery each time, you recharge it (...than transport of electricity - factoring everything in.)

    So perhaps you could refill using a bottle/can, much like cigarette lighters. Well yes, perhaps so... but consider traveling with this (think FAA regulations and whatnot)? And taking it with you everywhere ? Because unlike electricity, you can't just get this out of a wall 'hose' like you would electricity out of a wall outlet - and that's a good thing.

    Of course if you're going out to the middle of nowhere, it would be easier to take a bottle of methanol with you than it would be to find a wall outlet. On the other hand, if you're going out to the middle of nowhere, perhaps your cellular isn't going to do you much good anyway. And if you're going to be in the middle of nowhere with your laptop, I'd imagine you'd have a car to charge off of, or at least a second battery, and probably a base camp where you -do- have some form of electricity available to you.

    Some may claim that methanol is better for the environment - it burns clean after all... but from the source of the methanol down to the end-user, is it really that much cleaner ? Think extraction, purification, packaging, distribution, etc.

    Don't get me wrong, it can be wonderful technology - but for cellulars ? I have my doubts. For laptops ? Maybe if my laptop would run for 16 hours straight on it instead of 2.5 hours (my laptop is not often idle). But that appears doubtful, and I'd still have all the above issues.

    1. Re:Don't get too enthusiastic now... by Cerebus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Methanol isn't too common a substance, partially because it is some nasty stuff.

      Methyl Alcohol (Methanol) Oral rat LD50: 5628 mg/kg; inhalation rat LC50: 64000 ppm/4H; skin rabbit LD50: 15800 mg/kg; Irritation data-standard Draize test: skin, rabbit: 20mg/24 hr. Moderate; eye, rabbit: 100 mg/24 hr. Moderate. Investigated as a mutagen, reproductive effector.

      Not much to worry about, really.

      --
      -- Cerebus
    2. Re:Don't get too enthusiastic now... by The+Step+Child · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seconded. I've spilled worse things on myself while in lab. Methylene chloride, hexane, ether, chloroform. I've gotten a nice whiff of nitrogen dioxide (and if you live in the city, you've gotten your share also). Like a famous toxicologist said, "the dose makes the poison." If you're getting a couple drops of the low concentration stuff on yourself, you should be okay. Besides, Toshiba isn't that stupid, they probably have some kind of easy system that makes it difficult to expose yourself to the chemical.

  9. Re:Methane by titzandkunt · · Score: 5, Informative


    "The batteries double as a stinkbomb"

    Maybe it's just a throwaway remark, but there is still a widespread perception that methane stinks.

    Of course, it don't. The vile odour present in the domestic natural gas supply is due to the deliberate addition of a stenching agent such as an ethyl mercaptan. Of course, the purpose of the stenching agent is to alert people to the presence of uncombusted gas.

    T&K.

    --
    Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
  10. First step by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have held off on buying an MP3 player because I can't find one that supports OGG, has a radio in it, and gets good battery life. Assuming Toshiba puts one out that meets the first two specifications and has generous amounts of storage, I think I would look into this one.

    Right now, I have a Sony ATRAC3 MP3/CD player. It gets 50 hour battery life on 2 AA batteries, and has virtually unlimited storage (as many 700MB CDs as I feel like carrying), plus it only cost $100 or so when it was purchased. Granted, it doesn't support OGG, but when I got it I didn't know about OGG.

    In addition, I bought my laptop that I'm on right now from Toshiba Labor Day weekend 2003, and I've already decided I'm not buying a new one until Toshiba releases their new laptops that (according to the article I read a while back) charge 80% in 15 minutes with little discharge.

    I also recall an article about a fuel-cell based laptop, lasted something like 15 hours on one fueling. Don't remember if it was Toshiba or another company.

    Where are all these things? I've heard so much about them and I'm sure I'm not the only one anxiously awaiting them. Toshiba and any other companies need to hurry up and get these things out the door, as they will solve many of the biggest battery-related problems.

    1. Re:First step by DoubleRing · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you want a mp3 player that supports OGG you should check out the iAUDIO M3 and X5. They support FLAC too!

      They also have a quite a few flash players that support OGG.

      --
      Before you die, you see DoubleRing...
    2. Re:First step by rekrutacja · · Score: 2, Informative

      iAudio seems to be cheaper, check their product line: http://eng.iaudio.com/

      --
      This Is Not a Sig
  11. Sounds Good, in theory. by TwoTailedFox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Problem arises with a Variable. Batteries you just plug in, and go. Fuel Cells you refill? Half the public would be clueless. Some might even drink this fuel, or use it for their car.

    --
    ~The TwoTailedFox posts again....
  12. Pity they couldn't make it run on butane instead. by NeuroManson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On average, a butane refill cannister (for cigarette lighters) runs around $2-$3 for around 300 ml.

    Judging from the yields, you could refill the fuel cell at the cost of one of those butane bottles for a month (and $2 a month is pretty danged cheap).

    Would it take any major doing to redesign the fuel cell to process butane?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  13. Biggest problem... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They lock you into buying stuff. Ok, it lasts longer, but you cant plug it into the wall when you get home and have it good for another 12 hours... you gotta go out and buy more fuel canisters.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  14. Re:does it leak by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm more worried about the 99.5% methanol being combustable. It seems to me you are powering an mp3 player with lighter fluid. (And yes, I do realize methanol is harder to ignite)

    The 3.5ml and 10ml configurations contain quite a bit of fluid.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  15. Toshiba's "Cutting Edge Designs" Aren't So Great by SuperDuG · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Ref ( Here Here And Here )

    Essentially this is just a word of caution, Toshiba has in the past had faulty designs on overpriced hardware and screwed over the people who buy their products. I'm not just pulling this out of my ass, Toshiba claimed guilt on both of their laptop design class action law suits.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  16. Methanol hard to come by? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 2, Informative
    Methanol isn't too common a substance, partially because it is some nasty stuff.

    You're joking, right? Methanol is an ondinary alcohol from methane (CH4) just like ethanol is an alcohol from ethane (C2H6). Ethanol is alcohol 'as we know it' of course.

    Indeed, methanol has somewhat of a bad reputation because it makes you blind, but it is FAR from difficult to get. As far as I know it is easily manufactured and a common by-product of fermentation of beers, wine etc. Apparently its effect is limited when mixed with (more) ethanol (present in drinks), I have heard (not sure) that if you go to a hospital with methanol intixocation, you are fed ethanol intraveinously to counter it. AFAIK the major causes of blindness are illegal distilleries (crooks selling 'bad' liquor), NOT people accidentally drinking a bottle of pure methanol.

    Anyway, methanol is a very common household product, used for cleaning, degreasing, fondue sets... Ok, it is not safe to drink but neither is gasoline, cleaning agents etc.

    1. Re:Methanol hard to come by? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are correct about the ethanol - methanol and ethanol are broken down by the same enzyme (alcohol dehydrogenase), so by increasing ethanol concentrations, you outcompete the methanol, and slow the formation of the toxic element (formaldehyde then formate) which interferes with the mitochondrial respiratory chain.

      The mitochondria are what "power" your cells, and it is damage to these which kill susceptible cells, like optic nerve, and retinal cells (which is why methanol causes blindness in high doses).

      So when they give ethanol to people with methanol poisoning, it slows methanol breakdown, so that the formaldehyde and formate can be cleared from the body without building up to dangerous amounts.
      (There are also new therapies with near-infrared light which can stimulate mitochondrial activity allowing the cells to survive even with formaldehyde and formate present).

  17. Re:Methanol by Drakonite · · Score: 2, Informative
    cheap as current alkalines

    "Cheap" is on the opposite end of the spectrum from how I'd describe current alkalines.

    --
    Shoot Pixels, Not People!
  18. Re:Methane by wkitchen · · Score: 2, Informative
    The vile odour present in the domestic natural gas supply is due to the deliberate addition of a stenching agent such as an ethyl mercaptan. Of course, the purpose of the stenching agent is to alert people to the presence of uncombusted gas.
    A practice that is largely due to this terrible event in 1937.
  19. Stop and think. Do we REALLY want this? by sbaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is *such* a good idea - but I guarantee it'll get screwed up by the big corporates:

    IN UTOPIA:

    In an ideal world, there would be an industry-wide standard for the little container of fuel - there would be 50 manufacturers of them world-wide and they would be easy to find, interchangeable and CHEAP (just like AA batteries).
    Their life is much longer than batteries and they pollute much less.

    HOORAY!

    IN THE REAL WORLD:

    In the real world, they will be like ink cartridges. Locked up to the wazoo with encrypted interfaces - unrefillable - unique not only to one manufacturer - but perhaps even to one model in their range. They'd be impossible to find in any store anywhere in the world - and they would cost an absolute fortune. Since there is no way to replace them with regular batteries, you're completely screwed.

    GACK! Give me back my battery-operated devices!

    Which do you think we'll end up with?

    The pressure to sell portable consumer items like MP3 players, PDA's, etc for bottom dollar will cause manufacturers to give away the players for much less than they cost - then do the 'bait and switch' trick and charge 100x more for an ethanol cartridge than they actually cost to make.

    Consumers don't like that in printers - let's not let that happen for MP3 players, etc.

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  20. Re:Stop and think. Do we REALLY want this? by GlassUser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now, you just made me think of something. I wonder what the required size for one of these is. That is, I wonder if you could make a AA form-factor one that spit out 1.5v. That might shake things up a tad.

  21. reason behind the fuel-cell craze by nido · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They have to keep the charade going. Fuel Cells were the "switch" in the "bait & switch" con Automakers played to get out of California's Zero Emission Vehicle mandate. The California Air Resource Board wanted automakers to sell Batery Electric Vehicles (BEV). GM was going all-out to meet the mandate, but then GM's visionary engineers got kicked out, and then they spent some $600 million lobbying against ZEV.

    "We can't do BEV 'cause the batteries aren't good enough and people won't want a car that they can't instant-refill. But Hydrogen! Hydrogen is just like gasoline, except it's clean! Never mind that there's no efficient or economical way to get hydrogen, advances in 30 or 40 years will make it possible!"

    Of course, now that ZEV is DeaD, battery technology has advanced to the point where an "instant" re-charge is possible...

    See Perspectives on Fuel Cell and Battery Electric Vehicles, and this mailing list post on GM's coming demise ("good riddance").

    CARB's Fuel Cell Detour on the Road to Zero Emission Vehicles

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com