Slashdot Mirror


3-Way Motherboard Shootout

Steve writes "Hexus.net has put three high-end i955X-based motherboards through their paces, to see which is the best LGA775 platform motherboard. Intel's own offering falls a little short, but Gigabyte and ABIT both make compelling boards, with ABIT taking the top-spot by a small margin."

18 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. No guns were found by prurientknave · · Score: 5, Funny

    The test ended rather abruptly when it was found the motherboards were not equipped with guns as ordered.


    Move along. Nothing to see here folks.

  2. three way by DavidLeeRoth · · Score: 5, Funny

    it would have been even more embarrassing if the article was called "Threesome Motherboard shootout."

    1. Re:three way by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thanks for the idea, always looking for something new and exciting.

  3. What about quality? by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How is the quality of these boards? Will they still be working in two or three years? Or will they have leaking capacitors by that time?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  4. I prefer the Gigabyte by StarHeart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if the Abit has a slight performance lead, I like all the features on the Gigabyte more. It is nice to see two pata connectors instead of just one like the other two boards. It also has more PCI slots than the Abit.

    --
    Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
  5. Avoid Abit High Ends by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Informative

    I used to think brands really didn't matter. Until I bought the Abit Ka7-100. It was a highend board back around 2000 with 4 Dimm slots and 6 PCIs, 1 AGP. And an ISA slot which could be used when sacrificing the last PCI slot. It was fantastic at the time.

    Then the transistors fried. I paid for shipping etc and got a replacement. Then it fried again, replaced, then fried again. 4 years later Abit sends me a letter saying they lost a lawsuit for selling select board models with broken transistors including the Ka7-100. Basically they knew it, and told consumers nothing about it.

  6. Faster, higher, stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, we get it. You guys can build big motherboards with gobs of features, including legacy stuff I'll never use.

    For once, I'd like to see somebody build a small motherboard with modern connectors, quiet (or no) fans, and no legacy crap that just takes up space. Right now, about the only way to get that is out of a Mac mini.

    I'm still using a 5-year-old computer that I've only upgraded once (bought a new 80 GB disk to replace the old 9 GB one). It's still fast enough for everything I do -- if/when I upgrade, I hope to get something smaller and quieter. I don't care about faster, because the slowest new computer available is faster than this sub-GHz Athlon.

    It's kind of sad that, over the past 10 years, the only thing that's really changed about motherboards is that they've gotten faster. They've gone to all the work to come up with new and faster and smaller busses (Firewire, USB2, S-ATA, etc.), but it doesn't make the boards any smaller if they're still including all the big old legacy ports, still, too!

    (Yay, floppy, IDE, and PCI slots! What, no ISA?)

    ISTM that all motherboard manufacturers today build pretty much the same product, which is aimed at ... everybody, which means "nobody in particular". This is a market ripe for picking. If somebody had the brains and balls, they could really make a killing. How about a Mac mini-like motherboard?

    1. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by eLDeR_MMHS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's been stuff out there for several years now.

      A lot of the "small form factor" barebone cases by Shuttle, Biostar, Soltek, etc. might fit your spec.

      Most of those cases are still at least four times bigger than a Mac Mini to accomodate full-size AGP/PCI-Express/PCI cards and 3.5" and 5.25" bays but then they are probably four times smaller than a regular PC tower. Price-wise they are somewhat more expensive than a DIY PC.

      But yes, someone has thought of this.

      --
      -Victor Chow (Elder_MMHS)
    2. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you've somehow missed the chatter about the miniITX boards?

  7. pssst.... by KillShill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    these motherboards contain intel's DRM technology.

    pass it on.

    http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2449

    search for DRM in the above site for confirmation and some extra info.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    1. Re:pssst.... by Fastball · · Score: 4, Funny

      pass it on.

      I would but my motherboard prevents me from doing so.

  8. Why can't they link directly to this? by Mechcozmo · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://www.hexus.net/content/reviews/review_print. php?dXJsX3Jldmlld19JRD0xNjAw

    Printer friendly version for everyone so that this (click, load ads) doesn't (click, load ads) happen (click, load ads) to (click, load ads) you (click, load ads).

  9. The most important thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Only one thing matters. Warranty.
    As a Genuine Intel Dealer, I can expect a replacement board to be overnighted even before I send the faulty one back. That way there is minimum disruption to the customer.
    Try telling a customer their server is down for a few weeks while you wait for the board to be shipped back to Taiwan/China for testing before they'll issue a replacement.

    Had a few customers who got non-Intel boards and had no computer for up to three months while waiting for a replacement. Think about that. That's three months paying for broadband you can't use for some people. The inconvenience cost adds up pretty quickly. Kinda makes a 5% increase in motherboard performance seem pretty irrelevant.

    And Intel has a good history of actually fixing mistakes. FDIV bug -> replaced processors. VC820 SDRAM bug -> new board and free RDRAM RIMM.

    Oh well. I'll stop ranting but hopefully you get my point.

  10. ECC Memory support is extremely important... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 3, Informative

    and that's why I got a D955XBK in my new dual-core P4 Extreme system. It's amazing how 99% of desktop computer users have NO IDEA if their memory flips a bit every now and then (let alone correcting it!). The Intel MOBO supports ECC memory.

  11. That Hexus site... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 3, Funny

    That Hexus site is one of the most anoying I've ever seen. Every other word is highlighted with a sponsored link that's often not related at all to the subject at hand. It seems to me that the whole point of that site is to have mildly-useful content simply as click fodder.

  12. Still the old standards... by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Abit, gigabyte and intel? Sorry, theres a new highend standard, especially for overclockers. If you havn't heard of DFI, they have some kickass boards, loads of features, and rock solid. I guess they have a dozen s775 mobos, and im sure they'll have i955 chipset boards soon.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  13. Generally Satisfied with ABIT Quality by dsci · · Score: 3, Informative

    While I don't have experience with these particular boards, I've have had very good luck with two ABIT models:

    KT7E and KX7-333R

    The KT7E has been running virtually non-stop for 4 or 5 years; the KX7 likewise about three years. Both have been used constantly for their service life running floating point, number crunching code.

    Both boards have withstood cpu fan failures and powersupply failures; replacement of the faulty components and they're up-n-runnin'.

    I'd recommend ABIT to anybody with the caveat that I did have some problems with the KX7 until a bios update was done. Since then..no problem.

    Though I have to admit, my newer systems are ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxes with Athlon 64 X2's. ;)

    --
    Computational Chemistry products and services.
  14. those were very likely capacitors by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not transistors.

    And honestly, many mobo companies had problems with this at that time. There was a company making knockoff capacitors that appears to be high quality components. Many good mobo makers got taken by this. It was covered on slashdot.

    I personally won't buy Abit again if I can avoid it, for different reasons. My high end from them is still working, but I had significant problems in the beginning and minor problem all along, and they just never even responded to my queries on their forums.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95