Ulrich Drepper On The LSB
Sam Lowry writes "In a recent post at his livejournal, Ulrich Drepper criticizes the LSB standard and urges the distributions to drop it." It's an interesting piece; Ulrich raises some good points.
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
> assuming he's someone since ./ quoted him in an article.
./ (which looks to be dotslash to me).
:)
I don't want to sound like a smartarse, but is there a reason most people write "slashdot" as
I'm not the ultrageek who is certain just what the name 'slashdot' is meant to mean, so explanations in short words is good for me
"grammer"?
Hmmm....
Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
Hey, this is Slashdot...dups are allowed...
The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
Speaking of editing, the linked post could certainly use some:
"My advise: but the losses. Remove any claim that the LSB will ensure any additional level of assurance for developers. To some extend, I think, the claims a scaled back meanwhile, if I understood Art correctly."
"is a somewhat good reflection of who a Linux implementation should behave "
"we file bugs and wait of the test to be waived."
What does this guy have against the Least Significant Bit/Byte (LSB) anyway? Geez...
Fefe - is that you? o_O;
np: Barbara Morgenstern - Mjisnjedschaz (Fjorden)
"I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole