FCC May Push Bells to Unbundle DSL

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Tuesday September 20, 2005 @06:28PM from the new-players-same-wires dept.

Carl Bialik writes "The FCC is nearing approval of two big phone deals -- Verizon-MCI and SBC-AT&T -- according to people familiar with the situation cited by the Wall Street Journal. But regulators are considering requiring asset sales and other moves, including the offering of unbundled DSL, 'without requiring consumers -- mostly home users -- to subscribe to phone service. Verizon already allows some customers to do that, but SBC doesn't. ... Patrick Mahoney, an analyst at Yankee Group, said that traditional phone lines are cash cows, so allowing customers to buy Internet access without traditional phone service would be costly to telecom providers.'"

1 of 233 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Same problem with cable by jensen404 · 2005-09-20 18:43 · Score: -1, Redundant

Where I live, I can get DSL without telephone service, but I'd have to pay an extra fee that would be about as much as just paying for phone service. That is on top of the $10 a month DSL fee for not having the premium phone package. Same thing goes for cable. If I want cable internet without cable TV, I have to pay $10 more than the advertised price.