Slashdot Mirror


Linux Standard Effort Edges Ahead

ErikPeterson writes "The Free Standards Group has released its third version of the Linux Standard Base, an effort to unify some of the workings of the open-source operating system. The LSB is designed to make it easier for those producing higher-level software to support different versions of Linux. Pledges to conform to the requirements of Version 3 are Red Hat, Novell's Suse Linux, Asianux and Debian."

7 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. Making progress... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny


    Pledges to conform to the requirements of Version 3 are Red Hat, Novell's Suse Linux, Asianux and Debian.

    Four down, only 458 to go.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Making progress... by gowen · · Score: 1, Funny
      when I last subsribed to the debian lists (some time ago now), I remember a bit of a flame war over an earlier incarnation of LSB.
      A flamewar? On a Debian mailing list? Inconceivable.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Making progress... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      Four down, only 458 to go.

      C'mon, you know the only way this stuff will standardize is when Microsoft Linux comes out ;-)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. Re:Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then, by that definition, neither metric nor imperial are standard systems of measurements. Why? Because not everyone is using it.

    You lose. Have a nice day.

  3. LSB by gustgr · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article gets funnier when you read LSB as Least Significant Bit.

  4. aaaaaaaRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    1. Re:aaaaaaaRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "aaaaaaaRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 21, @12:24PM (#13614490)
      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=paragraph "

      4 things to say to that reply to my posting:

      1.) Go to hell first of all, if you cannot draw the meaning of someone's words via the context in which they are used, YOU have the problem, not myself.

      2.) I don't need YOUR opinion, ok? Just those who have technical commentary on it, or the moderators' opinions on it (which got a "+1" interesting rating).

      3.) Additionally, IF you do NOT like what I write? Don't read it - pretty simple!

      & lastly

      4.) Care to somehow PROVE you have a PhD in English?

      (No, or not possible on YOUR end, to the last one? I thought as much...)

      * :)

      APK