Slashdot Mirror


The Company Everyone Loves To Hate

In honor of Microsoft's 30th year, Epeeist writes "The BBC is running a Have Your Say article on Microsoft at 30." From that article: "Microsoft will always adapt and buy into other areas to keep themselves at the top. They're the company everyone loves to hate." While they're reflecting, most people are focusing on the now. teslatug writes "Brian Jones, a Microsoft PM on the Office team, has just confirmed that the new default XML format of Office 12 is not compatible with the GPL. Brian believes that LGPL may be compatible, but others have raised issues about the ability to redistribute." Relatedly, shades66 writes "Microsoft's Alan Yates tripped over his own words in responding to the Massachusetts Information Technology Division's late-August declaration for OpenDocument and other open software standards." For some more colourful commentary, smooth wombat writes "John Dvorak has written an article for MarketWatch in which he postulates that the reorganization by Microsoft is actually a prelude to its breakup into three separate entities."

8 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. uneducated public (re: Microsoft's history) by yagu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wow, I'm breathless and speechless! Just read the litany of comments posted on the BBC article, collectively of which these posts represent the general sentiment of the posting community.

    If this is so, I'm devastated (but maybe I shouldn't be so surprised, as it is consistent conversations I have casually with friends and family). The general feelings seem to include:

    • Microsoft brought computing to the masses (what's wrong with that?)
    • Microsoft made lots of money by being good at what they do (what's wrong with that?)
    • Microsoft made computers easy to use (what's wrong with that?)
    • Microsoft is powerful and is led by the charitable Mr. Gates (what's wrong with that?)

    Most disturbing is a seemingly cavalier attitude about what are historical data regarding Microsoft's business practices, products, etc. As an excercise, note that in the list above, each "what's wrong with that?" can be interpreted in two ways.

    1. Why is everyone picking on Microsoft?
    2. explain why the point is misguided (exercise left to readers).

    As for Dvorak's speculation Microsoft is prepping to split into three companies, I don't get that. Why would they? One of Microsoft's major takeaways from the DOJ's penalty phase was not having to split up as a company. I'm am not a businessman, but I can't see Microsoft splitting unless forced to. (Though I wouldn't discount it as some huge PR spin to make it look like they're taking steps to not be the evil empire anymore while behind closed doors (and through underground tunnels) continuing to operate as a single company to ensure their continued position in the marketplace.)

    1. Re:uneducated public (re: Microsoft's history) by vcv · · Score: 1, Informative

      Windows not good for programmers? It's one of the best platforms to develop for. The sheer amount of things a developer that knows what they are doing can do with Windows would probably shock most /.ers.

      Bring on the flames.

    2. Re:uneducated public (re: Microsoft's history) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Have you used Visual Studio? It's bar none the best development environment out there. As for the API and .NET stuff, is Linux really that much better? Everything has its problems.

    3. Re:uneducated public (re: Microsoft's history) by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Such as?

      Digital Research and Stacker, to name two.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  2. Re:They need to sell... by NullProg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Too late, Microsoft already owns it.

    Xenix Information
    http://www.computerhope.com/unix/xenix.htm

    Enjoy,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  3. Re:They need to sell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Microsoft doesn't own Xenix any longer. They sold it to SCO years ago, and SCO Xenix eventually ended up being SCO OpenServer.

  4. Re:Agreed. by Rycross · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to Wikipedia, Gates has donated about 5 billion dollars in charity. Thats about 10 percent of his total wealth. The list of the accomplishments of the Melinda Gates Foundation is quite impressive.

  5. Re:Agreed. by Rycross · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ack, correction, that's 5 billion in 1999. "As of 2005, the foundation has an endowment of approximately US$28 billion." I wonder how much of that comes from Gates though (other companies donate to it, I believe).