Slashdot Mirror


Acetylene Based Life on Titan?

mindpixel writes "Astrobiology Magazine's Leslie Mullen has a fascinating interview with funky science dude David Grinspoon about the possibility that there may exist a whole new biology on Titan where the extreme cold slows normally explosive reactions to a biologically useful pace." From the article: "What's really new in our paper is that we go into the question of energy sources. If there's life there, what's it going to eat? What kind of food is there? And it turns out there's abundant food because of all this photochemistry in the upper atmosphere, where methane is being turned into other organic molecules. Some of those organic molecules are very energy-rich, and one that we consider in the paper is acetylene. We know it's being made in the atmosphere, we know it's raining down on the surface, and it's been detected at the surface with the Huygens probe. We calculated that, if acetylene is reacting with the hydrogen gas to turn it back into methane, quite a bit of energy is being released. So that's our basis for saying there is something to eat on Titan. We don't know if there are any customers, but there's something on the menu."

17 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. What is life, anyway? by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reading the article makes we wonder exactly what life is, anyway. It sounds as though we only require chemical conversion. What if there is a big rock that serves as a catalyst for this conversion of acetylene and hydrogen to methane. Would we think of that as a life form? Or would we require reproduction? Would reproduction be possible in this slow-motion frozen gel we find on Titan?

    It is interesting, though, how the life and the planet co-evolves. Life has really changed Earth and it may have affected Titan, as well.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    1. Re:What is life, anyway? by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like the definition of life which is based on complexity theory. Anything that shows less entropy than the environment of which it is contained is typically alive.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:What is life, anyway? by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      False. For example, BSE ("Mad Cow Disease") prions have no "blueprints".

      The earliest lifeforms will inherently have no "blueprints". In fact, the earliest proto-life won't necessarily make a copy of itself. What you're likely to see is chemicals that tend to catalyze reactions with various ligands to create chemicals similar to themselves. When the local "soup" becomes more concentrated with chemicals similar in form, eventually self-catalytic cycles can emerge - basically, a puddle of self-catalyzing goo that is a non-distinct "organism" which expands itself slowly outward. Large hypercycles may have many processes (even independent processes) competing for the same ligands and reactants; a particular cycle can benefit itself over its neighbors by beginning to poison its competitors' reactions. Even without membranes walling off distinct "organisms", and with each set of reactions scattered throughout the same space as its competitors, the individual processes can sabotage and even consume each other as ruthlessly as any modern day life. Eventually, membranes can form (membranes are surprisingly easy to establish; many chemicals inherently line up into sheets, which other chemical reactions or simply natural currents can make into small spheres) which provide defense for a tiny area. This area being small, all but one competing hypercycle gets killed off within it. If the remaining side hypercycle contains the processes for producing the membrane itself, you have a very inefficient, but functional, Ur-cell.

      "Information" isn't needed for life. In fact, "information" is a concept that is context-sensitive; nothing inherently has "information", and in fact, our genes only contain "information" when we put those chemical structures in the context of "what will this do to us after a storm of chain reactions ends up down stream?". By themselves, they're just chemicals, reacting as chemicals do.

      --
      Also, I can kill you with my brain.
    3. Re:What is life, anyway? by pomo+monster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, you have to wonder he means by "a biologically useful pace." I assume he means chemical reactions proceeding slow enough for us to recognize it as life, but isn't it just as possible for life to exist in high-energy (explosive) conditions, only too fast for us to realize it's there? And why couldn't there be life in frozen oceans with chemical reactions too slow for us to recognize? Hmm.

    4. Re:What is life, anyway? by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, crystalline structures would be alive with respect to that characterization. Even amending reproduction to that characterization wouldn't suffice to make it work since some crystals are known to spontaneously break when they reach a certain configuration and whose fragmented peices build duplicate structures. (God I wish I had a reference for this)

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    5. Re:What is life, anyway? by PokeyMillie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "It sounds as though we only require chemical conversion." Love and a mothers bond to a child have been found to be attributed to chemical reactions or hormones being released in the brain.

  2. I wonder... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Suppose there is intelligent life in there, what will they think of earth creatures?

    "Amazing! The third planet creatures support temperatures so high that none of the titan lifeforms could withstand. Let's call them extremophiles".

    Kinda makes you think...

  3. Reminds me of a Hal Clement story by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Clement's Ice World was set on a unthinkably frigid world where sulfur was a solid and liquified steam covered the surface!

    It was Earth, of course. The protagonist was an alien scientist kidnapped by drug smugglers and forced to analyze a horrific drug they'd been buying from the natives. It's a juvenile, really, but enjoyable by adults as well.

  4. Further study needed? by jacks+smirking+reven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who elsewould like to see 10 billion taken out of that moon landing money and put towards a few swarms probes to Titan to confirm this. Something to researhc this, and the JIMO mission are what i'd really pushed up schedule. Life outside our planet is the type of scientific and philisophical question that we should make all strides to answering. Jupites moons and Titan are the only places we essentially have left in our immediate solar system that might contain life. We really owe it to ourselves to research these to their final conclusion. I'd be happy to expand humanity into the solar system once we know we're not the only thing on it.

  5. Re:Farts for dinner? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We should be feared when we eat bread (the farts of yeast) and honey (the piss of bees). Or a can of beans.

  6. The Bigger Question by lcreech · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is the impact on religion. The 7th day and so forth. Like Copernicus and Gallileo popping the churches/government bubble isn't pleasent and because of the current polical atmosphere, these times are no exception.

    Not anonymous because I am not afraid, though I may regret it in the near term.

  7. Re:Farts for dinner? by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    honey (the piss of bees)


    As I understand it, bees create honey as a convenient way to store sustenance for themselves, not as a waste product. So it's not so much the piss of bees as the cud of bees, or perhaps the canned food of bees.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  8. Spallation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How does the earth replenishes its carbon 14 source (half-life of 5730 yrs)? Spallation. This is the reason for carbon dating can be "somewhat" constant and "more or less" reliable. (Assuming that the high energy particles are constant.)

    This is a great topic to stump some of the more well educated scientists. N2 ----> 14CN.

    http://www.sns.gov/aboutsns/what-why.htm

    My question: does spallation work on Titan? I know that Saturn has an intense magnetic field, but I don't know if Saturn emits high energy particles. Can high energy particles from our sun can reach that far to influence Titan? I wonder if he factored this into his theory or not. The article does not explain this. I would figure that he would have to take this into account, if high energy particles are "abound." These particles can change most of the gases in the upper atmosphere to many different types of molecules. Using acetylene from methane as an example is very loaded. If there is enough energy to make this, why would acetylene not want to change into larger organic chains when exposed to this high energy or react with the next nearest neighbor molecules. Considering life is a major leap, however there is some chemistry (using high energy light/particles) that can do similar things.

  9. Cool anyway, but the article wasn't that complete by BerntB · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Really cool point that the reaction speeds are slowed so normally fast reactions might be usable.

    Reactions slows with temperature either because diffundation speed slows (the speed of molecules) or that the energy of the collisions between molecules aren't enought to make them react.

    The molecular speed should be a problem. I believe cell size of modern life is limited by diffundation of oxygen and other molecules. Any life would have to use lots of transportation engines in their cells (or keep them very, very small).

    Life generally needs to do reactions in long chains (especially things that are energetic like acetylene!) Some enzymes could be good catalysators and help the reaction rates, I guess. But are they really made from proteins on Titan? What is used instead of water? Methane?

    Assume that the "proteins" are working in clusters. Then we have cell membranes, DNA and...

    Any physical chemist care to comment? Is there some trick to keep big C-based molecules moving about at ca 94 K average temperature?? (According to Wikipedia)

    Now, even if possible functional cell parts can be conceived, considering the slower reaction rates -- how muc longer would life take to evolve? (Fewer reactions/second means that random reactions are tried slower.)

    (No pun intended with my "Subject".)

    Is there a slashdot site for physical chemists I can go read their comments about this story? :-)

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
  10. Re:Farts for dinner? by moonbender · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's correct. From Wikipedia: "Honey is laid down by bees as a food source. In cold weather or when food sources are scarce, bees use their honey as their sole source of nutrition."

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  11. Re:life on titan by mormop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or it could have been touched by his noodly appendage

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  12. Re:Yet Another Overlord? by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Only one overlord? Think of all the money we'd lose from betting on the Overlord Championships. The small toy market alone would collapse overnight if we pulled all the Overlord action figures from the shelves. Think of the children!