Slashdot Mirror


USPTO Reexam Finds $521M Eolas Patent Valid

theodp writes "As predicted earlier on Slashdot, looks like the W3C goofed by shutting out the public and asking the Patent Office to base its reexamination of the Eolas Web Plug-In Patent solely on prior art promoted by Microsoft. The USPTO has reaffirmed the validity of the $521M patent, rejecting the W3C's prior art as deficient for not demonstrating the capability of ongoing real-time manipulation and control by the user. The USPTO also considered but rejected the prior art of the Viola Browser, which formed the basis for Microsoft's appellate argument. Ironically, Eolas' defense was bolstered by the arguments of its expert witness, 2005 EFF Pioneer Award Winner Ed Felten."

6 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdot EZ Post TM by Hack+Jandy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot EeziPost (TM) MK I

    [ ] Another: [ ] Dupe [ ] Slashvertisment [X] WTF [ ] $editor is a dork

    [X] Frist psot [ ] link to GNAA [ ] Link to goatse [ ] $random_drivel

    [X] I Haven't RTFA, but... $random_opinionated_comment

    [ ] Slashdotted already!. I bet their server runs on $topic_item too

    [ ] Soul_sucking registration required

    [ ] Mod Parent [ ] up [ ] Down

    [X] Fsck: [ ] SCO [X] Micro$oft [ ] DMCA [ ] DRM [ ] MPAA [ ] RIAA [ ] Google [ ] Bush [X] You all

    [ ] I for one welcome our new $topic_item overlords

    [ ] Imagine a beowulf cluster of those

    [X] In Soviet Russia, $topic_item owns you!

    [ ] Meh!

    [ ] Netcraft confirms $topic_item is: [ ] dead [ ] dying

    [ ] But have the inventors thought of what will happen if $random_amateur_insight

    [X] Once again the USA is clamping down on my [X] Amendment rights.

    [ ] You insensitive clod

    [ ] But people who download music from P2P networks are more likely to buy the album

    [ ] Cue DVD Jon-type crack in 3..2..1

    [ ] Torrent, anyone?

    [ ] Here's a link to a patch: $random_linux_distro_url

    [X] Profit!!

    [X] Still no cure for cancer

  2. Hey Eolas! by Chordonblue · · Score: 5, Funny

    Party in Middle Earth tonight! You're buying!

    Signed,

    Frodo and Gimli

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  3. Re:As long as they don't attack Open Source by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They are waiting. They lost this on purpose basically to give legitimacy to software patents. They are gaming the system.

    They won't need to sue anyone once they have total control. And that is their goal.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  4. Re:I forget by pgpckt · · Score: 5, Informative


    Are you serious???? Have you not heard of the Patent Reform Act of 2005, H.R. 2795 ?

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.0 2795: ( the bill)

    http://www.ipo.org/template.cfm?Section=Patent_Ref orm1&Template=/TaggedPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TP LID=196&ContentID=18391&requestTimeout=500 (everything you could ever possibly want to know)

    This is making major MAJOR changes to patent law (prior use rights, first to file instead of first to invent, creation of public opposition proceedings, publication of all patents, etc, etc, etc.) in 10 or 12 MAJOR areas of patent law.

    And this thing is going to pass. It has wide congressional bipartisan support and the support of the all the major players. And it is a good thing for consumers.

    Yikes, get your facts straight.

    --
    Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
  5. Re:I forget by troc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Erm. No.

    First to file is much better than first to invent. In the case you mention that you invent someting first but someone else files first (both arrived at the same invention independently), your invention would make their invention INVALID as it would be perfectly valid prior art against their invention.

    There's a few complications as regards the way certain countries and regions handle situations like this, but they system, isn't designed to punish you for being slow to file.

    Here in Europe we have situations like this quite frequently where someone will oppose a granted patent using as evidence their own (or other) internal documents (or even product brochures). If it can be shown they genuinely have a point, then the patent could be invalidated or, in rare cases they could get to share the patent.

    First to invent requires HUGE amounts of perfect paperwork at all times and is open to all sorts of fraud.

    Plus, the US is the only major country that doesn't have first-to-file as a basic concept. In fact, that plus opposition boards etc - they are simply copying the European patent office.

    --
    Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
  6. Re:As predicted earlier on Slashdot, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am the great Slashdot. I am all user accounts, and yet I am none--I am THE Anonymous Coward. As you have humbly submitted thyself to my greatness, I shall take pity on thee and bestow my answer...

    I cannot provide an exact date, but the following events will foretell the coming of a woman in your life:

    Microsoft adds support for the OpenDocument format.
    SCO realizes the error in their ways and open sources Unix.
    A full year will pass here on Slashdot without a single dupe.
    Duke Nukem Forever will be released.

    As a final blessing, I foresee that you will meet this woman though the relationship services provided by Googlezon's EPIC system.