Slashdot Mirror


Ray Kurzweil's "The Singularity is Near"

popo writes "The Wall Street Journal has a (publicly accessible) review of "The Singularity is Near" -- a new book by futurist, Ray Kurzweil. By "Singularity", Kurzweil refers not to a collapsed supernova, but instead to an extraordinarily bright future in which technological progress has leapt by such exponentially large bounds that it will be... well, for lack of a better word: 'utopian'. "Mr. Kurzweil... thinking exponentially, imagines a plausible future, not so far away, with extended life-spans (living to 300 will not be unusual), vastly more powerful computers (imagine more computing power in a head-sized device than exists in all the human brains alive today), other miraculous machines (nanotechnology assemblers that can make most anything out of sunlight and dirt) and, thanks to these technologies, enormous increases in wealth (the average person will be capable of feats, like traveling in space, only available to nation-states today)." On one hand its fantastically (even ridiculously) optimistic, but on the other hand, I sure as hell hope he's right." Got mailed a review copy; I'm not finished yet, but I agree - optimistic perhaps, but the future does look pretty interesting.

3 of 970 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like he has read ... Iain M Banks by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Iain M Banks (to be confused with the non-sci-fi writer Iain Banks) has written a lot of book about "The Culture" a man/machine symbiosis that has created a utopian society in which people get what they need.

    Actually it sounds also like Robert Heinlein, Asimov and most other Sci-Fi writers I've ever read. But mostly like Iain M Banks who books are a cracking read.

    Living to 300... of course we will, we'll have to work till we are 280 though.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  2. Re:Well hurry the hell up then. by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At the point of transition from hunter-gatherer to farmer, starvation was much higher among the farmers. It took a centuries in just about every culture before farming was as reliable a source of food as it replaced. Farming produced more food per acre, but popultation density went up as well, so the average person was worse off.

    Things are much better today, but not every step is a step forward from the individual's point of view.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  3. Re:Well hurry the hell up then. by Lobo42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, and if this book is anything like his previous books, he will no doubt spend an entire chapter recounting each and every accomplishment he has made since birth, lest you forget you are reading from a "genius."