Slashdot Mirror


Bugzilla Delivered to the Desktop

sereda writes "Deskzilla released their desktop client for the Bugzilla bug tracking system today. The Deskzilla system promises to deliver features for greater productivity and improved working environment for the users of Bugzilla." There are also a few screenshots posted on their site.

17 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Re:A conundrum by koh · · Score: 4, Informative

    They use an older, stable version of Bugzilla to track issues in newer releases. Just like gcc folks use the current version of gcc to compile the next one. No magic here.

    --
    Karma cannot be described by words alone.
  2. Costs $99 per license by bradbeattie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Note that Deskzilla, unlike Bugzilla, is not open-source.

    1. Re:Costs $99 per license by bradbeattie · · Score: 2, Informative
      Either I'm missing your point or you're missing mine. I've made the following points:
      1. Bugzilla is open source
      2. Deskzilla is not open source
      3. A Deskzilla license costs $99
      4. Deskzilla's source code isn't available
      What points are you making?
  3. Re:A conundrum by nanop · · Score: 3, Informative
    From the deskzilla site, it seems that the benefits may include:
    • Hierarchical project structure and nested queries allow you to apply consistent and orderly approach to issue tracking by creating an issue breakdown structure
    • Issue counters give you the immediate picture of the state of your project;
    • Local database that acts as a cache for issues allows for quick and customizable database search;
    • User interface enhancements such as Threaded Comments View help working with issues;
    • Offline availability allows you to work with issues any time, regardless of the availability of Bugzilla server or the Internet.

    Think of it as using an IMAP client (Evolution, Thunderbird, etc...) instead of a web-based mail system such as gmail or hotmail. It's not laziness that drives this, but rather efficiency. Less time waiting for a webpage to load could correlate with increased productivity.

    Yes, I'm suggesting we need a SlashDesk app. That would increase my productivity 10-fold.
  4. Re:License by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For open source projects its offered as freeware. You need to send an email to opensource@deskzilla.com with your name, project's name & URL, and Bugzilla URL of the project for a freebie key.Then you may proceed to download the proggie.

    For everyone else, it's purely commercial. All your $99 are belong to them!

  5. Re:Is Bugzilla just for software development? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It is certainly very usable for a situation where you have a common goal and a few people working on sub-tasks that are required for that goal. Bugzilla will let you track what is dependant on what and let you easily communicate with each other.

    It's not as suitable for actually collaborating on content - that would work better with some Wiki software.

    It also doesn't really have anything that deals with timeframes and timelines.

    I've heard good things about http://www.edgewall.com/trac/.

  6. Re:Already written in Java... by bot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are a couple of eclipse plugins for bugzilla- buglist and the unimaginatively titled Bugzilla integration plugin for eclipse

  7. Re:A conundrum by jallen02 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It wasn't compiled. It was hand written in machine code. When I first learned machine code and we had to write things in machine code on the little virtual machines we had I was starting to think of assembly as an easy to use language. Heh. That is when you know you are at the bottom of the barrel ;) (It was actually pretty fun).

    Jeremy

  8. Re:Client/Server is so last millenium by frankie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Umm... if you don't have internet, you can't use a client-server app either.

  9. Re:Damn! by lilmouse · · Score: 3, Informative

    They offer free download for people in opensource development, and you can also use the "bleeding edge" version for free.

    --LWM

  10. Re:Did I miss something? by jgrahn · · Score: 3, Informative
    I thought we were moving away from fat client technology.

    Seriously, what is fatter than a bloody web browser? I've never understood why I'm expected to prefer web interfaces to other things. Especially when the web interfaces suck as badly as they do.

    Well, I haven't used Bugzilla, but I've used many others which my employer doubtlessly paid megabucks for, and which were clearly made and marketed as practical jokes. By unusability experts.

    We went from decentralized, to centralized back to decentralized...... now back?

    Centralization is orthogonal to the browser/local application issue. As a user, if there is a single, central database and a single, non-programmable interface, I'm screwed.

  11. MyEclipse already has Bugzilla plugin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    MyEclipse (an Eclipse plugin) already has Bugzilla integration, and only costs $30/year (whereas Deskzilla costs $99). I haven't used the Bugzilla integration much to say how good it is (J2EE app server support in MyEclipse is great, though). And I'm not really sure if they just repackaged this plugin that was already mentioned.

  12. Re:Already written in Java... by jenkin+sear · · Score: 2, Informative

    The MyEclipseIDE ( http://www.myeclipseide.com/ ) people bundle it into their add-on pack as well. IIRC, it's a slightly tweaked version of the bugzilla integration plugin.

    --
    What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
  13. Re:Is Bugzilla just for software development? by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Informative

    "It would have been worse if they'd gone with it and then I'd be stuck PHP programming"

    Isn't bugzilla written in Perl? Oh yeah, I remember the pain getting the dependency graphing to work local :) Works like a charm now. Haven't touched the machine in 6 months.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  14. Obligatory by Lillesvin · · Score: 2, Informative

    recursion (n.) See recursion

    --
    "Live free or don't."
  15. Re:local copy of buglist = security concern by lilmouse · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... and very very scary if there is any sensitive customer data in your bugzilla.
    Yes, but if there is such sensitive information in your Bugzilla, then the user would have access to it whether or not they use deskzilla. Or, contrariwise, if they don't have access to it without deskzilla, they won't have access with it.

    Think of Deskzilla (in this situation) as a way of copying the text from Bugzilla to a spreadsheet, except it's really really fast, and you don't have to do it yourself.

    If you're not using deskzilla, you'd probably still have this sort of confidential information running around in your browser cache, etc. Best bet, of course, is to encrypt the harddrive of the laptop, so if it gets stolen, nothing can be pulled from it. In the case that the user is "evil", then you can't do anything about it one way or another.

    --LWM
  16. But... by Jsutton1027w · · Score: 2, Informative

    The bleeding edge version seems to be unavailable for the moment. Also, if you want a free copy for being an FOSS developer, they limit you in the EULA for Open Source Projects to only one project. Now, I haven't checked to see if it was possible to use it with more than one, but they do not allow it in the license.