Slashdot Mirror


Internet Partitioning - Cogent vs Level 3?

slashmicah asks: "Internet partitioning and Tier 1 ISPs are something most people don't know much about (myself included). Today, however, some Slashdot readers might have run into some issues involving these two topics. Cogent Communications and Level 3, both Tier 1 ISPs, are apparently having some 'undisclosed' disagreements, causing an Internet partition by turning-off or deactivating their peering point. Cogent Co. has released a statement explaining their side of the problem, however they have no mention of when the problem will be fixed, or when they will sort it out. This partitioning is a problem because any [single-homed] computers that are connected through Cogent Co, can not connect to [single-homed] computers connected through Level 3. Having spent all day sorting out this problem, I ask Slashdot: Isn't there a better way that the issue of peering can be handled/regulated? If not, does the future hold a scenario in which the Internet is split into several separate networks, only to be connected at the whims of large corporations?"

5 of 450 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Come on by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    > Why can't we all (Cogent and Level 3 included) just get along?

    The Internet's insecure enough without introducing race conditions into it.

    Besides, that's so 1990s. The 21st century equivalent is to yell "Tier 1 ISPs don't care about spam victims!"

  2. Re:OK, WTF time here by Frogbert · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes if only there were some mechanisms built into the internet as a whole that would allow for the forwarding of packets through a number of alternate routes if one link were to go down... "Routing" if you will.

    I envision such a system could be seriously robust and would possibly withstand a nuclear attack.

  3. Easy to Fix by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's an easy technical fix to this problem: Start a nuclear war at the location of this peering point. Then by design the Internet will route around that area, and communications will be reestablished.

  4. Re:OK, WTF time here by David+Gould · · Score: 4, Funny


      I envision such a system could be seriously robust and would possibly withstand a nuclear attack.

    Wow, sounds like something that could be of great strategic military value. I wonder if the DOD would be interested in developing this idea...?

    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  5. Re:Partitioning occasionally happens by heinousjay · · Score: 5, Funny

    caused several state's to literally drop off the map

    I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.