Google Declares War on Microsoft
hajmola writes "According to an article in The Inquirer, 'Google has confirmed that it will launch free spreadsheet and word-processing software online and take on Microsoft in one of its biggest markets. Under the deal, Google will allow web users to access Sun's OpenOffice from a toolbar.'" This is full confirmation of a story from Tuesday. Forbes thinks this isn't anything to write home about, while InfoWorld disagrees.
I've read through all the linked articles, and the articles *they* link to, and while the claims of "Google confirms it!" are plentiful, I haven't seen a single named source or attribution for this story.The Forbes story, in fact, still calls any Google online office venture 'speculation'. Where is this 'declaration of war'?
If all the world's a stage, anyone who says they want better lighting spends far too much time in a dark theatre.
Excuse me. StarOffice is Sun's. OpenOffice is ours.
Not only that, but the name of it isn't OpenOffice, it's OpenOffice.org (which is incredibly stupid-sounding and I wish they'd figure out a way to fix that). If Google and Sun were partnering on this, they'd use StarOffice, not OpenOffice.org.
You'd think journalists would be more careful, this soon after the single-use DVD hoax...
$x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
$x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
well http://www.writely.com/ seems to be doing ok
Hotmail was quite succesful in porting the mail client to the web, well before it was bought by Microsoft. I believe they weren't the first but they were the first very succesful ones. My first hotmail account is around 10 years old IIRC (blocked and wiped clean twice during vacation time).
-Sun will promote Google Toolbar
-Google will promote Java runtime and stuff
Nowhere does it say that there will be a in-browser version on OpenOffice. It's speculation. If you disagree, link me a press release and quote it.
-everphilski-
Thinkfree office has exactly the same service (a MS compatible office program available online, with document saving on their server for free)..
http://www.thinkfree.org/
But I imagine Google/Sun will get more publicity.
http://online.thinkfree.com.nyud.net:8090/ (Coralized)
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:9hxx796XGNMJ: online.thinkfree.com/+&hl=en (Google's cache)
http://online.thinkfree.com/ (Spare them please!)
heard of portable openoffice? http://johnhaller.com/jh/useful_stuff/portable_ope noffice/
ProCD telephone directory. Replaced by a million phone directory websites.
Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
Both Hotmail and CRMs rely on editing capabilities built into Web Browser. They don't require any special document formatting beyond simple text entry -entered text is formatted on server side and users have no control over formatting (except perhaps globally setting font sizes in their browsers)
... they were talking about promoting _CURRENT_ StarOffice/OpenOffice only.
Providing Word Processor using web browser is completely different thing - Web Browsers do not have word-processor editing capabilities. For example - AFAIK - the single edit control supported by browser can display text using only one font/font style. There are other problems - like existing text reformating and so on - for which I don't think it is good idea to use Web Browser for... until next DHTML spec is not designed for this purpose - then guess what - MS IE is not going to support it...
BTW, I haven't seen single sentence in Google/Sun press release that they plan to build web-based word processor
We all know what happenned to the big bad IBM of yesterday...
Instead of quibbling over nuances, consider this: Is it technically feasible to do this? Would there be any benefit? You betcha. Roger Kay's dinosaur quote below is great. It's funny, whenever you see one of those Microsoft adverts with the dinosaurs, it makes me think what a great OpenOffice add it would be, with Microsoft's Bob being one of the dinos.
I didn't forget them....look when you roll out code to production, general best practice is to do it when the least amount of your users are effected. That would be like a friday night (for most of your users). MOST of the users of Google News and Google Maps are in North America (the maps only do North America, UK and Japan last I checked). 1pm EST on a Wednesday would put primetime users in Europe, and work users all accross the US and Canada. Yes, it was a great time to roll out because the people in Iran and Madagascar were unaffected. Unfortunately, these service are neither available to them, useful to them, nor highly used by them. Thus it was a mid-day rollout for all intents and purposes, the least of which being that the code was rolled out in California.