Slashdot Mirror


Internet Growth in 2005 Sets Record

miller60 writes "Netcraft's Web Server Survey reports that a large gain in web sites in October makes 2005 the strongest year ever for Internet growth. The web has added 17.5 million sites so far this year, eclipsing the previous annual best of 16 million during the dot-com boom in 2000. And that's with two months left in the year. Is this growth for real? Web hosts targeting the small business market (like Yahoo Small Business and Go Daddy) report that business is booming, suggesting that web-wary local businesses are finally going online. But some of the the growth is likely due to domain name business models, with speculators buying large numbers of domain and placing advertising on them."

17 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. what real value from this info? by yagu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If this is true, it means there is a site for approximately one site per every 350 people on the planet! Hmmmm, don't know if that's impressive or not. However, some criteria that would make it more clear to me what they're counting as web sites:

    • they claim these are responses from "sites" -- what is the question/query? Is it a spider?
    • does a blog represent a single site? If so, would that mean a couple of Google machines hosting 10,000 blogs would represent 10,000 sites?
    • are load balanced sites (e.g., corporations, et. al.) represented as one site? Or are they represented by the number of machines balancing the load? (If this is true, then you can figure Google's contribution to the site count to be well over 100,000 by now.)

    As in the blog universe I suspect a large number of these sites are not much in substance. Aside from my curiosity about the realness of this number I wonder what really can be gleaned from it. It is interesting to see the profile and trends of the technology serving the sites (most notably Apache vs. IIS/.NET).

    1. Re:what real value from this info? by gunpowda · · Score: 4, Informative
      However, some criteria that would make it more clear to me what they're counting as web sites

      An older survey of theirs seems to contain the answer:

      The Netcraft Web Server Survey is a survey of Web Server software usage on Internet connected computers. We collect and collate as many hostnames providing an http service as we can find, and systematically poll each one with an HTTP request for the server name.

      So yeah, they're probably being quite lax about actual content.

    2. Re:what real value from this info? by joranbelar · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If this is true, it means there is a site for approximately one site per every 350 people on the planet!

      Correction, it means we have added one site per 350 people this year. In total, we have about 12 websites for every person on the planet.

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Time to drag out this old chestnut: by This+Old+Chestnut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "You can shovel more shit on the pile, but in the end you still just have a pile of shit."

    - Martin Luther, circa 1542

  4. I'll be the first to say whoopty-do by theantipop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of the 17.5 million new sites, 17.3 million are blogs about the sad life of a suburban middle-class teenager.

  5. And the graphs show MS is missing out by 00_NOP · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure they are still gaining customers - in a market expanding this quickly you have be really bad not to do that.
    But apache is winning big style - I wonder how many of those apache boxes are being hosted on Linux or BSD?

  6. Internet? Article should read... by max99ted · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...strongest year for Interweb growth.

    --

    Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

  7. But what happened to .info? by titaniam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I download the zone files about once per month for my surf engine, and noticed that this month the .info zone file shrank by ~30%... Is this past month the anniversary (1-5 year) of the .info TLD setup (ie bulk pre-registrations expiring)? What happened to info for the number of domains to go from 3.7M to 2.7M in one month?

  8. Not so impressive by Uukrul · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The web has added 17.5 million sites so far this year
    Viagra: Results 1 - 10 of about 12,800,000 for viagra . (0.07 seconds)

    So 17.5 million - 12.8 viagra webs = 5.3 million

    Texas Hold'em up: 3,720,000
    5.3 million - 3.7 Texas hold'em up = 1.6 million.

    So may be there are a lot of new webs, but if there are spam who cares?
    --
    My city: Barcelona.
    1. Re: Not so impressive by bartyboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      My God man! Why aren't you charging people for this brilliant research?

      Look what else Google tells us:

      - 149 people got bitten by a vampire
      - 20,900 people smell good
      - There are 4,730,000 websites dedicated to pickes

      You had better patent this research method before someone else beats you to it. But behold - I think 279 people have already done this!

  9. Cost by op12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The price of domains has gotten so low, that it's not all that surprising that this is the case. I think godaddy's got domains at just $2 now. I think it was something like $8 just 2 years ago.

  10. What's a site? by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If each blog is a "site", then that could explain a bit, considering that huge internet trend probably booming this year.

    If not, and it's e.g. a domain name, I personally find this a bit surprising. I thought the growth rate would decline a bit, and even recalling seeing such predictions just a few years ago.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  11. OH NO!!! by M00NIE · · Score: 3, Funny

    I better get out there and register LeftHandedElvisImpersonator.com before someone else does!!!!!!!

    --
    "As far as I'm concerned, I prefer silent vice to ostentatious virtue." ~A. Einstein
  12. No duh? by Pudusplat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It only makes sense that the amount of sites right now is growing exponetially. Every year more people are connected to the web, more people spend more time on the web, and more money is derived from and therefore pumped into the web.

    Most human driven growth, in almost any field (print, television, power generation, population sizes) tneds to be exponential, driven by the population increase and the parallel growth of technology and information management.

    --
    "If you put butter and salt on it, it tastes like salty butter." -Terry Pratchet, on Popcorn.
  13. Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    17.4 million of them are on Cogent, so we can't get to them.

  14. % of temp domains for spammers by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'd wager that a goodly number of the "active domains" are the random letter/word domains created by spammers to evade filters and blacklists. Because the cost of adding another domain is nearly $0, the statistic doesn't reflect as much new content creation as it might seem. Add to that the addition of new TLDs (and peopel buying their domain in multiple TLDs) and the practice of search sites slurping expiring domains to get traffic, and I wonder how much new content lies behind the increase number of "active domains".

    It would be interesting to analyze the number of domains per unique content set.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.