Slashdot Mirror


Stanford's Stanley wins DARPA Grand Challenge

tonyquan writes "DARPA has just announced that Stanford's "Stanley" autonomous ground vehicle has won the Grand Challenge, a $2 million contest for driverless vehicles over a 132 mile course in California's Mohave Desert. Stanley's winning time over the course was 6 hours, 53 minutes and 58 seconds, for an average speed of 19.1 mph. Second was Carnegie Mellon's Sandstorm (7:04:50), third went to another CMU vehicle "H1ghlander" (7:14:00) and fourth to the Gray Team's KAT-5 (7:30:16) More info from DARPA."

12 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. "MOVE OVER BUDDY" by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny

    Less than 20mph in an SUV through the desert. These Robot control cars are worse than my Grandmother on an interstate.

    Quite clearly these Robot controlled cars are part of a sophisticated plot to increase the amount of road rage in the US to enable the Robots to take over the country... and then the world.

    It is not too late to stop them, we must insist that the next competition involves only Ford Broncos and takes place on the Freeways of Los Angeles during rush hour.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:"MOVE OVER BUDDY" by earthforce_1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah but according to Moore's law, the robot cars should be able to break Mach 1 sometime around 2010.

      --
      My rights don't need management.
  2. The downside to this by Elrac · · Score: 5, Funny

    While I'm happy that these hard-working academics were successful, I can't help but note the downside to this development.

    Forget military applications. What I foresee is that, for computer scientists who've lost their jobs to outsourcing, this will deprive them of one more alternative, namely a career as a taxi/truck/bus/etc driver.

    --
    When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
  3. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Darpa has just announced? I read this in my morning paper (in the UK) several hours ago.

  4. Stanford + Volkswagen by SamuraiMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Drivers unnecessary"

  5. Re:so wait.. by Ansonmont · · Score: 3, Funny

    And, most of them were pretty close time-wise. The winner was only about 10 minutes or so ahead of the 2nd place finisher. From zero to five competitive finishers...of course all of these results will only be put to peaceful purposes. Isn't Darpa like a branch of the Peace Corps???

    -A

  6. Quote from the winner by VeganBob · · Score: 5, Funny

    01001001001000000111000001110111011011100110010101 10010000100000011110010110111101110101001000000110 0001011011000110110000101110

    --
    Being funny is my sig nature.
  7. Driverless? by cciRRus · · Score: 3, Funny

    a $2 million contest for driverless vehicles over a 132 mile course in California's Mohave Desert.


    The car is powered by 7 Pentium M laptops. No drivers? Are the laptops running in Safe Mode? Ah, that explains why its average speed is 19.1mph.

    --
    w00t
  8. Re:Good news by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Funny
    Maybe in 20 years we can have auto driving cars

    I can already imagine the following scene:
    You: *steps in car* "Drive me to uncle George?"
    Car: "Why do you want me to drive to uncle George"
    You: "Because it's his birthday, dammit. Now start driving!"
    Car: "You seem to be a bit angry. Where does this anger come from?"
    You: "Start DRIVING you gas-guzzling piece of shit!"
    Car: *accelerates to 100mph* *dumps core*

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  9. Re:so wait.. by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Funny

    What gives?

    Obviously, an infusion of alien technology must be involved. There is no other explanation.

  10. Re:Patriotism... sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Our Germans are better than their Germans."
    -- The Right Stuff

  11. Drivers Wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I bet the advertising guys didn't have this in mind.