Slashdot Mirror


Pay-Per-View to Provide DVD After Viewing?

Anonymous Coward writes to tell us that Comcast is entertaining an idea that would allow digital cable customers to purchase a pay-per-view movie for roughly $17 that would also include a hard copy in the mail a few days later. From the article: "The only snafu in the entire idea is the fact that only 40% of Comcast cable subscribers have the required digital box at this point in time. But still, that is 40% of 21 million customers which is not too bad. DirecTV and Dish, are you listening?"

4 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. The big question.. by almostmanda · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you watch it, and find out it sucks, can you cancel the order/send the hard copy back? How much do they charge you, then?

  2. The alternative by Mynn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You pay $3 bucks to watch it; if you like it, you can upgrade at the end to a "hard" copy.

    Or $3 to watch it, $10 to burn your own, or $17 to have a "good" copy sent to you (some of us don't realllly trust BYO DVDs to last, having had media/upgrade problems in the past).

    --

    Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
  3. Good idea, but doesn't quite hit the mark by tgd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I have to pay $17 for a PPV movie, I'm not likely to use it. If I pay $4 for one, and have the option to shell out another $13 after it for the DVD, thats something I'd use. Thats a try-before-I-buy sort of option.

    Comcast is definitely a company that "gets it" though. The on-demand works well, they're pushing out more and more HD content. 5+mbit cable modems, etc. If they could only get reasonable software on the digital PVR cable boxes, I wouldn't even be entertaining a switch to satellite. That and if they got Universal HD, so I could see BSG in HD :)

  4. Market Prices, eh? by Famatra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "They're going to take a business model (Pay Per View), add value by giving more to the consumer, rather than less (the ability to purchase the DVD), and deliver it at market prices."

    That would be a terribly interesting feat indeed - to some how arrive at a market price on a monopoly (though copyright) good. Make no mistake, even though some DVDs are less than others they are still maximizing profit by leverging their monopoly power by pricing the product to gain maximum profit given the demand *for each type of DVD*. This is not (free) market pricing, it is monopoly price discrimination.